Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
coffee_rules

#MeToo India 2.0

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

And people like you should punish yourself , father/brother/son if a woman comes and say you/ he raped me  without even asking them whether it is true or not

i most likely will. because as i said, the woman has far more to lose by coming forward than not. 

There is a huge gulf of difference between considering someone criminally culpable (for which proof is required) vs believing people on a 'he said/she said'. I tend to believe women on this issue, because most rapes go unreported and with no consequence. Which is a fact. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

i most likely will. because as i said, the woman has far more to lose by coming forward than not. 

There is a huge gulf of difference between considering someone criminally culpable (for which proof is required) vs believing people on a 'he said/she said'. I tend to believe women on this issue, because most rapes go unreported and with no consequence. Which is a fact. 

In that case I have to say that it will be biggest curse to have you as Male relative or friend.

What jasleen kaur or Rohtak sisters lost.All of them awarded while careers of guys badly suffered.

 

And yes most rape cases go unreported but in area where they go unreported neither feminists nor anyone care to reach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

In that case I have to say that it will be biggest curse to have you as Male relative or friend.

What jasleen kaur or Rohtak sisters lost.All of them awarded while careers of guys badly suffered.

Again, exception to the rule. You are simply speaking as someone pro-men,not impartial. Women risk shame, re-living trauma, etc. by coming forward. overwhelming # of times they come forward, its true. So why should i not believe them ?

You tell me what evidence they are supposed to have, if you want evidence before believing them. 

15 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

And yes most rape cases go unreported but in area where they go unreported neither feminists nor anyone care to reach

That is just knee-jerk unsubstantiated comment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Again, exception to the rule. You are simply speaking as someone pro-men,not impartial. Women risk shame, re-living trauma, etc. by coming forward. overwhelming # of times they come forward, its true. So why should i not believe them ?

You tell me what evidence they are supposed to have, if you want evidence before believing them

How is that pro men? Did i say I will never believe women? All I said both sides should have fair hearing.Only then we know which side is right and which is wrong.Just mere accusation is not enough to punish anyone

 

From your posts it clearly looked to me you are big fan of kangaroo courts , lynching mobs only if work according to your wishes. All of them operate on mere accusations without hearing other side of story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

How is that pro men? Did i say I will never believe women? All I said both sides should have fair hearing.Only then we know which side is right and which is wrong.Just mere accusation is not enough to punish anyone

Ok. So answer my question - what is proof in your eyes and what proof should men or women bring when it comes to accusations ? ( btw, i am not pro-women on this case, i am just pro-victim. If a dude comes to me and tells me a woman fondled him without permission and she denies it, i too will be inclined to believe the guy). 

18 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

 

From your posts it clearly looked to me you are big fan of kangaroo courts , lynching mobs only if work according to your wishes. All of them operate on mere accusations without hearing other side of story.

No. You need to read better. I did say already that i don't support the idea of criminal charges without proof, not unless many victims come forth with consistent stories over time, establishing a pattern. Like with Harvey Weinstien. 

But i do support shaming them and naming them publicly because this is the sort of crime, that doesn't leave credible proofs anyways in most cases. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

First Victim of #MeToo, an innocent man lost his life. Go and Weep!

The second tweet is for all Male Feminists..Please oblige and pay your respect to the Feminazi.

Nothing more than classic age-old 'look the other way' enabling of sexual predation. 

 

I have a very simple question to those who oppose #MeToo:

 

what evidence should victims of sexual abuse bring forward, before they accuse the perp ? 

 

Its a pretty simple and valid question: if you are going to say ' present evidence or its a fake allegation' , then you should specify what the heck constitutes evidence for you and what happens to those sexual misconduct cases that don't fit your evidence picture. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone comes forward I would encourage them. Remember the incident where 30 men raped a 11 year old girl for 6 months in Chennai. She didn't tell anyone. Finally her sister found out and told.  I don't think it is correct to discourage or throw shade at someone who step forward regardless of their profession.  Having watched, heard over the years tons and tons of harassment stories by Indian men against opposite sex ranging from little girl to married woman i am more likely to trust the woman than man. Some of them are absolutely sick and disgusting. Raping their own cousin sister knowing fully well she won't tell it to anyone. Yes due investigation is necessary. But discounting their story because there is no "proof" is not the right way.

Edited by vvvslaxman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Vilander said:

good be friends with her man, but be safe dont think you can ask her any favors when i say friends its just friends because she seems to be a fun person - but if you judge her and think you can get favors thats when it enters the harassment territory.

No, asking favor is not a harassment. Harassment when she says no to your advances but you still try to force yourself on her. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

she is going against the men who control bollywood. Risk of being blackballed is far real. As i said, i'd rather they go to the media than police, because going to police will be seen as gold digging. Here, they have very little to gain. 

Tanushree is now married and not working in movies anymore.  She has nothing to lose now. So, she is not risking anything in this case. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the me too movement is going to lessen the sexual exploitation of the little girls of today in future...then it will be a huge achievement .

If it empowers the little girls of today to not take this crap quietly , then it is a huge success.

 

I don't understand the cynics. It is like they don't have women in their lives that they love and care for. These women and girls in their lives live in the same **** world and face and will face the same problems . 

Do they think their wives and sisters and daughters have a seperate world that is all nice and innocent ?

 

Your sister and daughter may have to face the same kind of perverts when they go out of home or even in the home .what are they going to do then? Tell them to stay quiet if they don't have evidence of the abuse.

 

Creating an environment when the victims feel shamed or feel they should not  speak out because they have no solid evidence is also encouraging sexual harrassment .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, beetle said:

Your sister and daughter may have to face the same kind of perverts when they go out of home or even in the home .what are they going to do then? Tell them to stay quiet if they don't have evidence of the abuse

Just a simple question , if a woman comes and tell you that your husband raped or harrased her then what will you do .

1)Ask her for evidence

2)Ask your husband to hear his side of story

3) Straight forward divorce your husband without any evidence or hearing his side of story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Tanushree is now married and not working in movies anymore.  She has nothing to lose now. So, she is not risking anything in this case. 

She had taken up the issue when it happened .She was harrassed and had to leave .

 

May be she now has the strength to get back to it.....now that the environment is more conducive with' me too' and more women willing to come out .

Maybe she wants an emotional closure.

 

People from both sides should be allowed to talk and put forward their case without threat and bullying ( like Nana Patekar using MNS bullies) .

As more and more cases come forward and the initial shock is worn out, people will be able to see through the accusations.

 

Right now most are only accusations. If it goes to court then due process will in any way ensure justice .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

Just a simple question , if a woman comes and tell you that your husband raped or harrased her then what will you do .

1)Ask her for evidence

2)Ask your husband to hear his side of story

3) Straight forward divorce your husband without any evidence or hearing his side of story

Let it go to court .

I know my husband enough to stand by him till proven wrong .

If the case turns out to be false, I will drag her ass in court for defamation and abuse. Make sure she lives to regret it .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

Just a simple question , if a woman comes and tell you that your husband raped or harrased her then what will you do .

1)Ask her for evidence

2)Ask your husband to hear his side of story

3) Straight forward divorce your husband without any evidence or hearing his side of story

I have answered your question...now your turn.

 

If your daughter or sister goes out to work....would you like an environment where the perverts  can sexually harrass her in subtle and not so subtle ways.

Where her job security depends on her willingless to tolerate this kind of behavior.....

 

or would you like an environment where these perverts will be scared of sexually harrassing her because they know her word will be heard with fairness and not just taken as a female rant .

 

Me too is not just about accusations.

It is about making a safer place for all .

Your women, my women , our women and also men who are exploited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, beetle said:

If the me too movement is going to lessen the sexual exploitation of the little girls of today in future...then it will be a huge achievement .

If it empowers the little girls of today to not take this crap quietly , then it is a huge success.

 

I don't understand the cynics. It is like they don't have women in their lives that they love and care for. These women and girls in their lives live in the same **** world and face and will face the same problems . 

Do they think their wives and sisters and daughters have a seperate world that is all nice and innocent ?

 

Your sister and daughter may have to face the same kind of perverts when they go out of home or even in the home .what are they going to do then? Tell them to stay quiet if they don't have evidence of the abuse.

 

Creating an environment when the victims feel shamed or feel they should not  speak out because they have no solid evidence is also encouraging sexual harrassment .

If any indian says he is unaware of all the creepy things guys do on a daily basis then he is living in a cave. This has been going on for decades.  Chinmayee has absolutely everything to lose to come out and accuse Vairamuthu who has been a lyricist in Tamil industry for more than 3 decades. He is still doing most of the songs for AR Rahman. More corroborations come up. This creep has been trying to hug, kiss many girls.  She felt so bad she didn't even tell that to her husband for a while. Her Husband an actor backs that up too.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

Tanushree is now married and not working in movies anymore.  She has nothing to lose now. So, she is not risking anything in this case. 

Correction: she has nothing to gain. Talking about an embarassing event, especially in a country where a large # of people will see you as 'damaged goods / sucks to be you/loss of dignity' sounds like plenty to lose. 

An ex-actress, who is not suing anyone, risking humiliation, scorn and not to mention, re-living a traumatic event, is pretty much the definition of a 'nothing to gain, lots to lose' situation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

Just a simple question , if a woman comes and tell you that your husband raped or harrased her then what will you do .

1)Ask her for evidence

2)Ask your husband to hear his side of story

3) Straight forward divorce your husband without any evidence or hearing his side of story

hello, why are you running away from my question - what qualifies as evidence in your own scenario ?!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, beetle said:

Let it go to court .

I know my husband enough to stand by him till proven wrong .

If the case turns out to be false, I will drag her ass in court for defamation and abuse. Make sure she lives to regret it .

How does she prove its rape ?!

Even if she is able to prove that she and your hubby had sex, how does she prove its rape and not consentual sex ?! 

 

I think these are scenarios where a partner will stand by their guilty partners in most cases, because what qualifies as proof is so fuzzy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, beetle said:

Let it go to court .

I know my husband enough to stand by him till proven wrong .

Isnt this hypocritical?

On one hand you believe everything that is said by women in media is true but when it is one of your own men who is accused you want to wait till it is proven. This is ridiculously biased mob lynching.

1 hour ago, beetle said:

If the case turns out to be false, I will drag her ass in court for defamation and abuse. Make sure she lives to regret it .

When someone does provide rebuttals or file counter cases, feminazis still continue to shame them in media saying "Look this man is filing case against me and harrasing me. He is trying to subdue my voice and harrasing me and my family by asking me to go to court". 

No wonder ppl hate feminazis, they are the biggest enemies of the real victims. 

 

 

Edited by Shunya

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, beetle said:

If the me too movement is going to lessen the sexual exploitation of the little girls of today in future...then it will be a huge achievement .

If it empowers the little girls of today to not take this crap quietly , then it is a huge success.

 

I don't understand the cynics. It is like they don't have women in their lives that they love and care for. These women and girls in their lives live in the same **** world and face and will face the same problems . 

Do they think their wives and sisters and daughters have a seperate world that is all nice and innocent ?

 

Your sister and daughter may have to face the same kind of perverts when they go out of home or even in the home .what are they going to do then? Tell them to stay quiet if they don't have evidence of the abuse.

 

Creating an environment when the victims feel shamed or feel they should not  speak out because they have no solid evidence is also encouraging sexual harrassment .

It's not always personal. When a #MeToo goes around championing a cause of Tanushree Dutta as a genuine case of harassment, we cynics call out the hypocrisy. There are umpteen genuine cases in India, when people like Arnab back fake people like Tanushree, they don't know they are diluting the movement and the very basic cause. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

It's not always personal. When a #MeToo goes around championing a cause of Tanushree Dutta as a genuine case of harassment, we cynics call out the hypocrisy. There are umpteen genuine cases in India, when people like Arnab back fake people like Tanushree, they don't know they are diluting the movement and the very basic cause. 

how do you judge what is fake and what is not ?

As i pointed out, she literally has nothing to gain and a lot to lose by this. 

 

And yes, it will gain attention from high profile cases first, before less high profile cases come to light. this is how media works in every country. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, beetle said:

I have answered your question...now your turn.

 

If your daughter or sister goes out to work....would you like an environment where the perverts  can sexually harrass her in subtle and not so subtle ways.

Where her job security depends on her willingless to tolerate this kind of behavior.....

 

or would you like an environment where these perverts will be scared of sexually harrassing her because they know her word will be heard with fairness and not just taken as a female rant .

 

Me too is not just about accusations.

It is about making a safer place for all .

Your women, my women , our women and also men who are exploited.

In case of your husband, you want courts to prove his innocence, but in case of others, like Tanushree Dutta, you believe she's genuine and can throw any allegation at anybody, without any accountability or consequence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jst the begining but still the powerful wnt be questioned who do it most ....imagine a character artist like alok nath got away with this for 19 yrs so imagine the power big stars has

 

some will be suffer who deserve but the most powerful will cme through safe, if it really starts to comeout ....no one will be left ..no one

 

My biggest fear is someone like Vikas bahl, alok nath will face the consequence which is good , but nana might be saved due to power n identity politics

 

More stories will come against powerful only if they all get punished. 

N i hope harassament done by women also be bought to light , harassment can be of many times and they do to . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

how do you judge what is fake and what is not ?

As i pointed out, she literally has nothing to gain and a lot to lose by this. 

 

And yes, it will gain attention from high profile cases first, before less high profile cases come to light. this is how media works in every country. 

She has nothing to lose as well. She's out of the industry, whatever she's doing in US (plus size model or whatever), she will gain all the publicity she can muster. Listen to her interviews. Calling him Chindi Chor, how is anybody giving her cred. She has come with an agenda and she's milking all of it.  And our stupud #MeToos are rallying behind this joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Correction: she has nothing to gain. Talking about an embarassing event, especially in a country where a large # of people will see you as 'damaged goods / sucks to be you/loss of dignity' sounds like plenty to lose. 

An ex-actress, who is not suing anyone, risking humiliation, scorn and not to mention, re-living a traumatic event, is pretty much the definition of a 'nothing to gain, lots to lose' situation. 

somebody somewhere has to start and the gain is the movement has already started 

she is up against the most powerful fish unlike others but if u have gone through something n u wanna fight it u hve to start to look gain n loss coz in a fight u can loose or win both but its important that someone started it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, coffee_rules said:

She has nothing to lose as well. She's out of the industry, whatever she's doing in US (plus size model or whatever), she will gain all the publicity she can muster. Listen to her interviews. Calling him Chindi Chor, how is anybody giving her cred. She has come with an agenda and she's milking all of it.  And our stupud #MeToos are rallying behind this joke.

publicity for what??? she is being slut shamed

yea the best way to go in battle is when u hve nothing to loose. 

 

If she wud have agreed to harassment then , she wud have had a longer career instead she choosse to fight 

 

what agenda???

WO to tab bhi bolti thi but kisi ne suni nhin, today when social media is powerful n the movement has had its success in hollywood so now is the time

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^ We all get vibes about a person. Vinita Nanda, I really felt bad for her. Sorry, I can't force myself to feel bad for a fake like Tanushree. All her case, he was not supposed to be in the scene, she was forced to do a scene with him. It was an ego clash, not a sexual harassment. She is causing more harm to people with genuine problems. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

She has nothing to lose as well. She's out of the industry, whatever she's doing in US (plus size model or whatever), she will gain all the publicity she can muster. Listen to her interviews. Calling him Chindi Chor, how is anybody giving her cred. She has come with an agenda and she's milking all of it.  And our stupud #MeToos are rallying behind this joke.

She has a lot to lose. I just told you what she has to lose - dignity, respect, mental peace by re-living the nightmare. 
When you don't have anything professionally to gain, but society will still look down on you, that is definition of 'nothing to gain, a lot to lose'. 


How are you judging her for having an agenda, i would like to know ?! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

^^ We all get vibes about a person. Vinita Nanda, I really felt bad for her. Sorry, I can't force myself to feel bad for a fake like Tanushree. All her case, he was not supposed to be in the scene, she was forced to do a scene with him. It was an ego clash, not a sexual harassment. She is causing more harm to people with genuine problems. 

Sounds a lot like ' i dont like this person's personality, so i will automatically dislike them/not believe them' and vice versa from you. 

Not very objective. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

^^ We all get vibes about a person. Vinita Nanda, I really felt bad for her. Sorry, I can't force myself to feel bad for a fake like Tanushree. All her case, he was not supposed to be in the scene, she was forced to do a scene with him. It was an ego clash, not a sexual harassment. She is causing more harm to people with genuine problems. 

n what is that vibe

Coz tanushree dutta has done bold stuff in her movies so means she is fake 

 

It was not an ego clash from her side, she said is not comfortable.......thats it baat khatam waha pe 

If a women is not comfortable thats it n to her support it wasnt conveyed to her before 

 

Getting her blacklisted through MNS

how is that justified??/

 

 

how do u justify this ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

In case of your husband, you want courts to prove his innocence, but in case of others, like Tanushree Dutta, you believe she's genuine and can throw any allegation at anybody, without any accountability or consequence. 

Let them go to court. If proven wrong....let the accused take her to court.

Why are you so ready to not believe her?

 

Tanushree case  is not a new one.

When it happened, there was a lot of public harrassment .

 

Why can't you people see the larger good that this will hopefully bring for the women of this country?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shunya said:

Isnt this hypocritical?

On one hand you believe everything that is said by women in media is true but when it is one of your own men who is accused you want to wait till it is proven. This is ridiculously biased mob lynching.

When someone does provide rebuttals or file counter cases, feminazis still continue to shame them in media saying "Look this man is filing case against me and harrasing me. He is trying to subdue my voice and harrasing me and my family by asking me to go to court". 

No wonder ppl hate feminazis, they are the biggest enemies of the real victims. 

 

 

Do you know nana patekar or alok nath?

Can you vouch for them without knowing them ?

Do you know the same way as your spouse or sibling?

If a wife believes her husband, she should stand by him till he is not proven guilty.

Same goes for brother or son....unless there is clear prove .

 

Where is the question of hypocricy?

The case goes to court to be proven either ways.

How is it unfair?

 

As for these celebrities getting bad name

.....that is what being a celebrity means. You get in the spotlight for good or bad  very easily.

That is the price you pay for stardom.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

It's not always personal. When a #MeToo goes around championing a cause of Tanushree Dutta as a genuine case of harassment, we cynics call out the hypocrisy. There are umpteen genuine cases in India, when people like Arnab back fake people like Tanushree, they don't know they are diluting the movement and the very basic cause. 

No there is no diluting.

In this country sexual harrasent that does not involve 'forced sexual intercourse with injuries to prove it was forced  ' is taken too lightly.

 

Women are just expected to put up with other kinds of harrasement where ' the purity of the women' is not looted. 

 

It is time to put an end to this . 

Sexual harrassement begins with making people uncomfortable. It begins with taking pleasure in making others uncomfortable. 

Time for perverts to learn the boundaries  that  they do not have a right to force anything on others. 

Time for them to understand that what they have been doing till now makes them sexual abusers.

Tanushree's or others cases are just that .

 

Wish you could become a women in a crowded bus to know what sexual harrassment women have to go through in this country .

I have personally heard these assholes say' ghar se kyun nikalti ho' when the girls going to college object to there groping.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Ok. So answer my question - what is proof in your eyes and what proof should men or women bring when it comes to accusations ? ( btw, i am not pro-women on this case, i am just pro-victim. If a dude comes to me and tells me a woman fondled him without permission and she denies it, i too will be inclined to believe the guy). 

Each case is different so evidence depend on that.First thing is file complaint instantly then police can verify from the people around their whether the events described by woman are true.Moreover sharp police officers can easily distinguish who is lieing and who is speaking truth.One thing is sure there can hardly be evidence if case is filed after 10-20 or 30 years after incident.

 

10 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

But i do support shaming them and naming them publicly because this is the sort of crime, that doesn't leave credible proofs anyways in most cases. 

Shaming is form of instant justice, this mentality give birth to lynchings where people feel they have to do justice on mere accusation or suspicion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, UrmiSinhaRay said:

Alok Nath when you work in that infamous Bidaai serial- used to demand call girls in his vanity van

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk
 

Pehle toh tumne kabhi Alok Jee ke baare main kabhi Kuch  khulasa nahi kiya,  aaj  media ki afwaao ke baad tum bhi unke charitra par keechad uchalna shuru. 

 

Yeh toh Bandwagon pe jump maarne wali baat ho gayi. 

Edited by rageaddict

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Singh bling said:

In that case I have to say that it will be biggest curse to have you as Male relative or friend.

What jasleen kaur or Rohtak sisters lost.All of them awarded while careers of guys badly suffered.

 

And yes most rape cases go unreported but in area where they go unreported neither feminists nor anyone care to reach

How many such cases are there compared to the number of women who go through vile sexual harrassment every single day in this country.

While people rightfully have sympathy for such guys.....have some sympathy for the many many girls who stay quiet and suffer the humiliation  because they are expected to prove  that some one touched, groped , rubbed or poked them .

How does one prove that unless people are ready to stand by her and appear as witnesses?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, beetle said:

I have answered your question...now your turn.

 

If your daughter or sister goes out to work....would you like an environment where the perverts  can sexually harrass her in subtle and not so subtle ways.

Where her job security depends on her willingless to tolerate this kind of behavior.....

 

or would you like an environment where these perverts will be scared of sexually harrassing her because they know her word will be heard with fairness and not just taken as a female rant .

 

Me too is not just about accusations.

It is about making a safer place for all .

Your women, my women , our women and also men who are exploited.

I definitely want safe environment for her but rather than creating hungama on social media I want her to file complaint with appropriate authorities

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, beetle said:

How many such cases are there compared to the number of women who go through vile sexual harrassment every single day in this country.

While people rightfully have sympathy for such guys.....have some sympathy for the many many girls who stay quiet and suffer the humiliation  because they are expected to prove  that some one touched, groped , rubbed or poked them .

How does one prove that unless people are ready to stand by her and appear as witnesses?

 

 

Where did I say I have no sympathy for real victims.Infact you people by blindly supporting anyone just weaken their cases too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

I definitely want safe environment for her but rather than creating hungama on social media I want her to file complaint with appropriate authorities

Singh sahab,

Sometimes, the authorities refuse to entertain the oppressed because the perpetrators come from that strata of the society which can influence and control the authorities. That's when the social media hungama makes it difficult for the authorities to ignore the complainant. I know its hardly an ideal situation, but its a short term fix. There are cases where social media pressure has forced the authorities to file cases and follow up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

Each case is different so evidence depend on that.

I asked YOU, if someone came to YOU and said 'he/she raped me', what constitutes evidence for YOU? 
You are dodging the question and we all know why - because we all know, that evidence in these kind of cases (especially 1on1 rape) is practically non-existent. 

Quote

First thing is file complaint instantly then police can verify from the people around their whether the events described by woman are true.

How is this going to work if you groped someone, invited them over to your place for dinner and then raped them ? What people are around there ?

If i touch your nut-sack after coming to your room in the office, what people are there ?!

Quote

Moreover sharp police officers can easily distinguish who is lieing and who is speaking truth.

More nonsense. Plenty of policemen turn away genuine victims because they can't be bothered to investigate in India. 

Quote

One thing is sure there can hardly be evidence if case is filed after 10-20 or 30 years after incident.

Ok, so even if it 2 days after i come into your office, grab your junk and sexually assault you, what evidence is there ? 

Quote

Shaming is form of instant justice, this mentality give birth to lynchings where people feel they have to do justice on mere accusation or suspicion

Only if you are an extremist moron. Shaming needs to occur because there is hardly any evidence that is left behind in most of these cases in the first place. 

Edited by Muloghonto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mariyam said:

Singh sahab,

Sometimes, the authorities refuse to entertain the oppressed because the perpetrators come from that strata of the society which can influence and control the authorities. That's when the social media hungama makes it difficult for the authorities to ignore the complainant. I know its hardly an ideal situation, but its a short term fix. There are cases where social media pressure has forced the authorities to file cases and follow up.

In the country of 1.3 billion people how many can get justice through social media , 5,10,15 ,20 .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

I definitely want safe environment for her but rather than creating hungama on social media I want her to file complaint with appropriate authorities

So you want people to be arrested based on he-said/she said, but pointing them out at social media is a no-no. Makes zero sense, as usual. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

In the country of 1.3 billion people how many can get justice through social media , 5,10,15 ,20 .

math is not my strong suit. But 1,5,10,15,20 is still > 0.

 

Like I said, this is a short fix. Maybe even a deterrent. If this kind of a media blitz leading to an actual conviction makes even a single to be perpetrator change his/her mind, I'd say mission accomplished.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In both Tanushrees case or Navneet Nishan's case...there are eitger witnesses or multiple accusers. Still these women have to go through so much cynicism ans the worst kind of abuse in the social media.

 

What chance does a women who got abused in a lonely place without witness has with these kind of people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Guest, sign in to access all features.

×