Jump to content

Jadeja or Bhuvi for Perth?


sandeep

Jadeja or Bhuvi?  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. If you had to pick one out of the 2, assuming Vihari plays at #6, who should play at Perth?

    • Ravindra 'Sword-dance Rajput Boy' Jadeja
      6
    • Bhuvi 'Nice boi swings it big' Kumar
      24


Recommended Posts

Just now, sandeep said:

Umesh has a strong case.  Bit of risk due to his lack of bowling nous, and occasional tendency to leak runs, but he has shown a lot of improvement over the last few years.  The fact that the team announced 13 instead of 12, with Umesh in it, tells me that they are not confident of Bhuvi's fitness and rhythm.  As much as I love Bhuvi, if he isn't 100% fit and in rhythm, then he rides the bench. 

I don't really think this Australian team with defensive mindset are going to attack Umesh. They should bombard them with pace. 

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, sandeep said:

If Pant was a more reliable batsman, we would feel more confident playing 5+5.  Is there a case to be made for Party Patel?  Guy has always been quite reliable with the bat, and is proven against pace and bounce.  Plays spin like a boss as well.  

Don't think party Patel will score more than 20-30

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Don't think party Patel will score more than 20-30

If he scores 30 odd at the top of the order, that's an upgrade on Vijay already.  Not  to mention allowing us to play the 6th batsman and 5th bowler.  

 

Its academic anyway since they announced the 13 and he's not in it. 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, sandeep said:
  1. Its not a Dukes ball.  
  2. They are likely to shave off most of the grass before the toss.

 

Its a tough call.  Could go either way.  

Bhuvi was very effective in SA where they use same Kookabura if I am not wrong. Even if you shave most grass at last minute, moisture and softness of surface will remain from the grass for atleast couple of days. Bhuvi IMO must on this surface.

Link to comment

Jadeja on a green pitch will be useless with the bat and darts won’t have any impact. 

 

Bhuvi on these pitches is leagues ahead of Jadeja the bowler and has shown better temperament and defensive technique with the bat.

 

Vihari is a part timer and a decent part timer won’t do that much worse than most full time spinners on these pitches. Vihari seems a decent bowler. Well with the bat he is still a rookie so will be a good test in that regards as well.

 

Pretty much a no brainer. I don’t see why Jadeja is even in the scheme of things.

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

Jadeja on a green pitch will be useless with the bat and darts won’t have any impact. 

 

Bhuvi on these pitches is leagues ahead of Jadeja the bowler and has shown better temperament and defensive technique with the bat.

 

Vihari is a part timer and a decent part timer won’t do that much worse than most full time spinners on these pitches. Vihari seems a decent bowler. Well with the bat he is still a rookie so will be a good test in that regards as well.

 

Pretty much a no brainer. I don’t see why Jadeja is even in the scheme of things.

Because he offers control on one end.  And can make the rest of the bowlers more effective by keeping them rested.  4 quicks and a part-timer is a bit of a gamble...

Link to comment
Just now, sandeep said:

Because he offers control on one end.  And can make the rest of the bowlers more effective by keeping them rested.  4 quicks and a part-timer is a bit of a gamble...

If your fast bowlers need a lot of rest on a green mamba means your fast bowlers have sucked anyways. It is like playing a 3rd seamer on a dust  bowl. A part timer is good enough to get a few in for rotation. That too as a bonus. 4 fast bowlers should get the job done.

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

If your fast bowlers need a lot of rest on a green mamba means your fast bowlers have sucked anyways. It is like playing a 3rd seamer on a dust  bowl. A part timer is good enough to get a few in for rotation. That too as a bonus. 4 fast bowlers should get the job done.

How many overs do you think we'll bowl out Aus in?  If the bowlers have to bowl more than 170 overs in 4 days, that's a LOT of overs for 4 bowlers to deliver.  

 

 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, sandeep said:

How many overs do you think we'll bowl out Aus in?  If the bowlers have to bowl more than 170 overs in 4 days, that's a LOT of overs for 4 bowlers to deliver.  

 

 

We just won a game on a much more even surface with 4 bowlers. Sure a 5th bowler was missed at times but it wasn’t like we were a bowler short at best part-timer would have given us 10-15 overs max across 2 innings.

 

Vihari is playing as batsman who can bowl. He can give those 10-15 overs. More importantly his day job is as a full time batsman.

 

Jadeja is needed on pitches where he is expected to bowl marathon spells. If your spinner is bowling 25-30 overs per day on a green mamba and holding one  end up, you have bigger problems. 

 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

We just won a game on a much more even surface with 4 bowlers. Sure a 5th bowler was missed at times but it wasn’t like we were a bowler short at best part-timer would have given us 10-15 overs max across 2 innings.

 

Vihari is playing as batsman who can bowl. He can give those 10-15 overs. More importantly his day job is as a full time batsman.

 

Jadeja is needed on pitches where he is expected to bowl marathon spells. If your spinner is bowling 25-30 overs per day on a green mamba and holding one  end up, you have bigger problems. 

 

what guarantee is there that  Vihari is going to be a better batsman than Jadeja in AUS conditions?  That being the case what is the harm in prefering Jadeja over Vihari for the 6th postion?

Link to comment
Just now, rtmohanlal said:

what guarantee is there that  Vihari is going to be a better batsman than Jadeja in AUS conditions?  That being the case what is the harm in prefering Jadeja over Vihari for the 6th postion?

There is no guarantee. However that is regressive thinking. If you are going with the assumption that a guy who is a specialist bat is going to be worse than your bowling-allrounder.

 

The need is a batsman who can bowl a bit and since Vihari is the guy who fits the mould he should play. Bhuvi or even Umesh might score more than Vijay and Rahul Given their current form, you want them to open instead?

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

There is no guarantee. However that is regressive thinking. If you are going with the assumption that a guy who is a specialist bat is going to be worse than your bowling-allrounder.

 

The need is a batsman who can bowl a bit and since Vihari is the guy who fits the mould he should play. Bhuvi or even Umesh might score more than Vijay and Rahul Given their current form, you want them to open instead?

what does Jadeja lacks when compared to Vihari as a specialist batsman? Jadeja too has 56+ avg: in domestic. Jadeja has  3 300+ scores. Jadeja    plays in the top 6  for his ranji side. He has taken on quality oppostion players like  Kumble, Kohli,Rahane,Laxman,Gambhir etc etc when he played  in ranji trophy, duleep trophy etc etc. He avg:s 50+ in test itself  for the last 2 years or so.He has played some crucial knocks during this time period, which other wise would even have resulted in IND losing home series ,he  performed brilliantly with the bat in what ever few oppertunities with the bat even abroad    thus proving his mental toughness. To add to that he is a left  hander.So I am curious to know as to why you prefer Vihari over Jadeja... 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...