sandeep Posted June 8, 2017 Author Posted June 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said: This loss is inexplicable, we win 99pc of these England flat tracks nullify the likes of Jadeja. This basic factor has not entered into the brains of our captain.
CG Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 England flat tracks nullify the likes of Jadeja. This basic factor has not entered into the brains of our captain. Wrist spin of Kuldeep Yadav would have helped on these tracks. sandeep, Mosher and GoldenSun 3
Ultimate_Game Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Tattieboy said: Outside India it's the norm Nope. Won us the last CT in 2013.
surajmal Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 5 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said: This loss is inexplicable, we win 99pc of these I think we need to give SL some credit. Mosher and sandeep 2
Yoda-esque Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 Just now, surajmal said: I think we need to give SL some credit. Agree.But even their win came from nowhere.It isn't like the signs were there.
Sandeep99 Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 Poor start, Poor batting in the death, poor fielding up front cost us the match. Sri Lanka should have lost 3 wickets in the first 10 overs but our superstar dropped sitters. Overall a very average game for India.
kubrickian Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, Pollack said: Indian players are clueless. They even thought score against WI in t20WC was above par. They were targeting 180 Same thing in World T20 Final 2014. Sometimes they tend to become conservative in batting approach and settle for what they think is a good score rather than try to get as much as possible.
surajmal Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Yoda-esque said: Agree.But even their win came from nowhere.It isn't like the signs were there. Maybe this is their Yuvraj/Kaif natwest moment. Edited June 8, 2017 by surajmal
sandeep Posted June 8, 2017 Author Posted June 8, 2017 10 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: 10 overs 1/54 is pretty good on a patta I suppose. If the legendary "phaaast" bowler Umesh had comparable figures we may actually have had a chance. But I'm sure you think Bhuvi's the problem Yadav went for 67 runs with 2 balls left. Subtract 14 runs from it, and that's a reasonable amount of runs to defend for the last over, even for the likes of Pandya. Jadeja and Yadav were the worst of our bowlers today. Bhuvi/Bumrah kept us alive till the end. Ultimate_Game 1
Yoda-esque Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 Just now, surajmal said: Maybe this is their Yuvraj/Kaif natwest moment. Seems like it...
Pollack Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, sandeep said: Are you kidding me? He was the best bowler in the game. Inspite of a big over in the end, he went for 5.4 RPO. Provided 2 crucial break-throughs. You are so full of crap if you see him as a problem in today's game. You count run out as bhuvi's wicket? Heh! Umesh too got one! Did not say he was the only problem. Bhuvi is now been touted to be a good death bowler and hence warranted a spot even on batting friendly conditions with no swing.At the end of the day Bhuvi went for runs in death overs. He was just as bad as others. Edited June 8, 2017 by Pollack
kira Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 Tharanga didn't play today because he was banned, one guy got retired hurt , 2 wickets were gifted to us through runnout and they still chased it easily
Ultimate_Game Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 Just now, sandeep said: Yadav went for 67 runs with 2 balls left. Subtract 14 runs from it, and that's a reasonable amount of runs to defend for the last over, even for the likes of Pandya. Jadeja and Yadav were the worst of our bowlers today. Bhuvi/Bumrah kept us alive till the end. If Umesh had bowled even a couple of overs without a boundary SL batsmen would've been forced to take on Bumrah & Bhuvi but Umesh leaking boundaries never allowed that to happen. Leaked runs and couldn't bowl even one decent over in the 2nd spell. beetle and sandeep 2
sandeep Posted June 8, 2017 Author Posted June 8, 2017 18 minutes ago, Hell Raiser said: We could have scored 350 had jadhav came in to bat ahead of a certain best finisher in the world. Sure. Pandit Maharaj and Ajmeri Baba told you that? What about Rohit and Shikhar scoring a combined 203(207). That's almost 70% of the balls allowed. That's the biggest problem in our batting. Not Dhoni with his not-great, but acceptable 63(52). Yoda-esque 1
Sgattick10 Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 I can understand if we lost 2-3 wickets in first 10 overs 310-15 would have been good but 100 run partnership upfront and still we end up with 320 that's below par batting.
Rasgulla Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 (edited) Man why don't people realise this is highest chase ever by sl ? Crap bowling Edited June 8, 2017 by Viper
CG Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 If Umesh had bowled even a couple of overs without a boundary SL batsmen would've been forced to take on Bumrah & Bhuvi but Umesh leaking boundaries never allowed that to happen. Leaked runs and couldn't bowl even one decent over in the 2nd spell. Dunno how that's possible when gunaratne hit next over of Bumrah for 11 and Bhuvi for 10 express bowling 1
kira Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 Sharma's phateechar innings wouldve lost us the last match too but he was saved by some great lower order hitting and phateechar pak batting
beetle Posted June 8, 2017 Posted June 8, 2017 We scored enough and the bowlers bowled well. To phir kya ho gaya skipperji? They batted too good.Not our fault. Lord 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now