diga Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Next step : uniform civil code Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Excerpt from judgement of "secular" supreme court of "secular" India. randomGuy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Tough day for Lutyens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 Those aggressively for TT have toned down today. But, we cannot forget what they actually said, like women have less intelligence and that Congress supported TT alongside its Kapil Sibal. Leave the judgement on one side , but the arguments placed by the TT team has to be the important issue as many people have such hatred for women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veer Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 4 hours ago, ravishingravi said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 4 hours ago, ravishingravi said: Rajdeep sardesai is idiot. He really wants to attack modi on unrelated point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBN Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 (edited) https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/899907722358947840 Edited August 23, 2017 by PBN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattaca Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 50 minutes ago, PBN said: https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/899907722358947840 I don't understand the politics of left and left journalists. Bjp and modi are happy triple talaq is gone. The left journalists are not happy and trying to divide people based on religion. Most of educated Muslim males and females would agree this is a good decision. GoldenSun, Ironhide and Gollum 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 3 hours ago, PBN said: https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/899907722358947840 That b!!tch !!! Reminds me of an article by Suhasini Ali talking about how in a village some burkha clad Muslim women know how to ride a cycle and hence all Muslim ladies are more progressive than all Hindu ladies and how Hindu women must learn from the niqaabis. WTF is wrong with these so called leftists? They seem heartbroken after this verdict. GoldenSun, randomGuy and Ironhide 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chewy Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 4 hours ago, PBN said: https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/899907722358947840 Lol, husband and wife are like dumb and dumber Kerberos 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuge Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/watch-journalist-heckled-abused-by-men-at-aligarh-muslim-university-after-triple-talaq-verdict/story-ZMMIGxxf7uQr3e6EOtpwdO.html Journalist heckled in AMU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 ^ Are those the same who are living in "unease" and"fear" according to Mr Ansari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surajmal Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 How do in country that is 80% hindu, 4/5 judges end up belonging to minorities in a given bench? Someone explain this. How do you say Apartheid in hindi? diga 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 16 minutes ago, surajmal said: How do in country that is 80% hindu, 4/5 judges end up belonging to minorities in a given bench? Someone explain this. True. Also how did 5 men get to decide this women's case? diga 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 (edited) Lots of work ahead... Edited August 23, 2017 by someone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randomGuy Posted August 23, 2017 Author Share Posted August 23, 2017 (edited) 45 minutes ago, surajmal said: How do in country that is 80% hindu, 4/5 judges end up belonging to minorities in a given bench? Someone explain this. How do you say Apartheid in hindi? Lol, Out of 27 currently sitting judges in SC, only 4 are seemingly non-hindus : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sitting_judges_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_India These 4 were included in the bench constituted for this case so that anti nationals can't claim the verdict as hindus oppressing muslims. Edited August 23, 2017 by randomGuy Detonator 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tibarn Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 4 hours ago, surajmal said: How do in country that is 80% hindu, 4/5 judges end up belonging to minorities in a given bench? Someone explain this. How do you say Apartheid in hindi? This is the latest version of secularism invented in India. The logic is that since India is a secular country, all religions should be represented equally on the SC bench. The word secular literally means that something should have no religious/spiritual basis, yet in India, the nakli-liberals have warped it to mean literally the opposite: Judges are selected based on their religion. They are also acknowledging that judges can't be impartial regarding the constitution, and put their religious beliefs first: after all, if the judges were impartial, it wouldn't matter that what religion they were from, as they would be ruling solely based on constitutional law, not religious scriptures and sentiments. What's even funnier, regarding the triple talaq case. The 3 judges who ruled to abolish TT were: Hindu, Parsi, and Christian. 3 non-Muslims, none of whom know anything about Islamic law, are saying that TT is un-Islamic as the basis of their judgement. The only actual person who would even remotely be familiar with Islamic law, Nazeer, ruled to keep it. Now the AIMPLB or Imam Council can, if there is an avenue to re-look at this issue in the SC again, simply find a Koranic verse or some Hadith, etc and show the SC and they will have to overturn their ruling. The bench laid the judicial precedent that the practice is un-Islamic and thus illegal, rather than an issue of "women's rights" or "equality" and thus illegal. Kya vaat hai randomGuy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerberos Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 13 hours ago, PBN said: https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/899907722358947840 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone Posted August 25, 2017 Share Posted August 25, 2017 https://swarajyamag.com/ideas/scs-3-2-triple-talaq-verdict-deserves-two-and-a-half-cheers-not-three This kind of judgement is dangerous, for it wrongly places holy books above the Constitution. If upholding the Constitution needs a reference to holy books, it follows that the law is about interpreting different religious laws so as to align them with the Constitution rather than upholding the Constitution itself. Worth reading in full. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts