narenpande1 Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 Worst list: Rajdeep Sardesai and his biwi Nidhi razdan Best list: Vishnu Som ( the only white sheep @ NDTV) Minhaz Merchant where would you put the others like arnab goswami, Ravish Kumar , Shekhar Gupta, etc...
randomGuy Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 amish devgan - not too bad...good shows, Innocent guy n unintentionally funny sometimes..
Vilander Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 Worst. Bharkha Dutt for trying to curtail freedom of speach of a blogger. Best Vinod Dua
Yoda-esque Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 LolSent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
Yoda-esque Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 Prannoy Roy & Vinod Dua ( were best in 90s ) don't know how's the scene now.LolSent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk Under_Score 1
randomGuy Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 Pranoy Roy, vinod dua, ravish, barkha etc are just bjp/hindu hating twisted minds.
WC2011INDIA Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 On 2/23/2018 at 1:17 PM, randomGuy said: Rohit Sardana, Rajat Sharma... Decent. Rajat Sharma fits this "Chehre par mat jao"
WC2011INDIA Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 (edited) 17 minutes ago, randomGuy said: Pranoy Roy, vinod dua, ravish, barkha etc are just bjp/hindu hating twisted minds. Rajat Sharma is a bjp/rss bhakt...just as biased. I find all TV journalists have their agenda. Edited February 24, 2018 by WC2011INDIA Singh bling 1
randomGuy Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 Just now, WC2011INDIA said: Rajat Sharma is a bjp/rss bhakt... Better to be a bhakt than a hater :)
narenpande1 Posted February 25, 2018 Author Posted February 25, 2018 Nidhi razdan for me is despicable filth.
narenpande1 Posted February 25, 2018 Author Posted February 25, 2018 (edited) Here is nidhi razdan at her filthy worst... The British MP strips her apart for her anti Modi bias... Love the way Sambit Patra, destroys her here. Nishi Razdan is such a lowlife anti-indian w$&@e that I doubt it’s even about NDTV being Bank rolled by Congress. She may be bankrolled by padosis. She sells cheap. Edited February 25, 2018 by narenpande1 adi B 1
Muloghonto Posted February 25, 2018 Posted February 25, 2018 6 minutes ago, BeardedAladdin said: She's nothing. her and Rajdeep will work for whoever pays. If an industrialist close to the BJP buys out NDTV, and sends Prannoy roy into retirement, these reporters will immediately change sides and report the BJP point of view. And that is how it should be. Its called professionalism. Ie, keep your feelings at the door, outside your work and when you go to work, represent the company's ideals. If thats too much, find a new job. Most Indians do not get what professionalism means. Peshust 1
narenpande1 Posted February 26, 2018 Author Posted February 26, 2018 29 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: And that is how it should be. Its called professionalism. Ie, keep your feelings at the door, outside your work and when you go to work, represent the company's ideals. If thats too much, find a new job. Most Indians do not get what professionalism means. Journalism is supposed to be neutral - you can have ideals/biases as a media house - but they cannot and should not be fact altering. Even in the case of anti-Modi media houses you can take facts and shape your narratives around them - in the case of NDTV- they shape facts to fit their anti-BJP narrative. Nidhi Razdan is no less anti-Indian than that third rate filth that is Arundhati Roy. These people are cancerous elements for India.
Muloghonto Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 10 minutes ago, narenpande1 said: Journalism is supposed to be neutral - you can have ideals/biases as a media house - but they cannot and should not be fact altering. Every position, unless it is completely exhaustive, is 'fact altering' by method of unequal stressing of points and/or omission. News is supposed to be neutral. Ie, news of X happened. Journalism is a far broader POV and has no basis to being neutral. 10 minutes ago, narenpande1 said: Even in the case of anti-Modi media houses you can take facts and shape your narratives around them - in the case of NDTV- they shape facts to fit their anti-BJP narrative. Nidhi Razdan is no less anti-Indian than that third rate filth that is Arundhati Roy. These people are cancerous elements for India. Again, what you are calling third rate filth or cancerous, are simply professional people acting professionally. Unless you have personally talked to them, you have no idea what THEIR values are. They are simply representing their company's priorities- as ANY employee should.
Gollum Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 Worst- Rana Ayyub, she has no right to be alive, on ISI payroll.
Vilander Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 15 hours ago, Muloghonto said: Most Indians do not get what professionalism means. ?
Vilander Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 15 hours ago, narenpande1 said: Journalism is supposed to be neutral - you can have ideals/biases as a media house - but they cannot and should not be fact altering. news merchants, opinion leaders its a dangerous trend. Both sides are guilty of doing this, needs strong regulation both for left and right wing new channels.
Mariyam Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 5 hours ago, Gollum said: Worst- Rana Ayyub, she has no right to be alive, on ISI payroll. That is thinking very highly of her. I don't think she qualifies as a journalist. Her 'work' comes across as a hybrid of haiku and a schizophrenics ranting. coffee_rules 1
Mariyam Posted February 26, 2018 Posted February 26, 2018 (edited) 18 hours ago, Muloghonto said: And that is how it should be. Its called professionalism. Ie, keep your feelings at the door, outside your work and when you go to work, represent the company's ideals. If thats too much, find a new job. Most Indians do not get what professionalism means. Why the need to generalize? Peddling lies, because your company asked you to, doesn't fall under the ambit of professionalism (in the context of journalism). I think you are mixing lobbying (a democratic right) with a news channel showing a blatant bias and asking its reporters to show a certain narrative which may not be completely factual. The two aren't the same. The latter can result in libel. And has many times. Edited February 26, 2018 by Mariyam adi B 1
Recommended Posts