lamellavig Posted September 22, 2018 Author Share Posted September 22, 2018 Many of you are underestimating the synergies that would come by playing metronomical Jadeja as a fifth bowler instead of the idiot Hardik Pandya. You would have 6 specialist batsmen, 1 allrounde plus insanely economical bowler, plus 4 insanely economical bowlers. It's a pity that none of you understand the principles of Cruyjffism. Jimmy Cliff and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 Link to comment
kohli Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 10 hours ago, lamellavig said: Chahal cannot be dropped. Pandya can be dropped. Pandya is dispensable, Chahal is not. IF you choose to play Bumrah-Bhuvneshwar-Kuldeep-Chahal-Jadeja, you have 5 consistent threats who each economy rate under 5. I can assure that IF we play these 5 bowlers, the combined synergy will be such that it will be IMPOSSIBLE for the opposition to score over 240 in 50 overs. Play attacking cricket. Drop hardik pandya. Play Rohit-Dhawan-Rahul-Kohli-Jadhav-Dhoni-Jadeja-Bhuv-Kul-Cha-Bum. As much as I support Pant, I would play Pant ahead of Jadhav only. Dhoni in a final, has increased threat of effecting crucial stumpings of specialist batsmen to spinners that Pant may not be capable of. We can't play with 3 spinner. Link to comment
Sooda Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 10 hours ago, lamellavig said: Chahal cannot be dropped. Pandya can be dropped. Pandya is dispensable, Chahal is not. IF you choose to play Bumrah-Bhuvneshwar-Kuldeep-Chahal-Jadeja, you have 5 consistent threats who each economy rate under 5. I can assure that IF we play these 5 bowlers, the combined synergy will be such that it will be IMPOSSIBLE for the opposition to score over 240 in 50 overs. Play attacking cricket. Drop hardik pandya. Play Rohit-Dhawan-Rahul-Kohli-Jadhav-Dhoni-Jadeja-Bhuv-Kul-Cha-Bum. As much as I support Pant, I would play Pant ahead of Jadhav only. Dhoni in a final, has increased threat of effecting crucial stumpings of specialist batsmen to spinners that Pant may not be capable of. In the Asia cup the pitches being what they are, that bowling lineup can work, even with only two seamers. But we are building for England WC. Where Hardik has to play tbh, as 3rd or 4th seamer. Bhuvneshwar, Jasprit , Khaleel and Kuldeep can make up the rest Its not a choice between Pandya and Chahal, if anything its Jadeja and Chahal. I wish that had picked Krunal this was a great opportunity wasted. Link to comment
Sooda Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 1 hour ago, lamellavig said: Many of you are underestimating the synergies that would come by playing metronomical Jadeja as a fifth bowler instead of the idiot Hardik Pandya. You would have 6 specialist batsmen, 1 allrounde plus insanely economical bowler, plus 4 insanely economical bowlers. It's a pity that none of you understand the principles of Cruyjffism. Lets wait and see, he has been economical in one match against Bang where the pitch helped. Can he do it on a cold, wet Tuesday night at Stoke? UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
Moochad Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Chahal has been top 3 spinner since his debut. No doubt it would be wrong to drop him! UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
UrmiSinhaRay Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Only Jadhav is the one who'll be dropped In favour Of Jaddu once Pandya comes backWhadda Lineup!! Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk Link to comment
RAZPOR Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Don't be surprised if we play with a lineup with 5 spinners ,two fast bowlers and Rayudu and Raina in the middle order in the WC in England. This team management and selectors are capable of anything. UrmiSinhaRay, Sgattick10, Frustrated and 2 others 1 3 1 Link to comment
zen Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 20 hours ago, lamellavig said: I can assure that IF we play these 5 bowlers, the combined synergy will be such that it will be IMPOSSIBLE for the opposition to score over 240 in 50 overs. On pattas, it is hard to stop teams from getting big totals .... for e.g., in Jo’berg, Aus-SA game produced 800+ runs. Both sides have good bowling attacks .... the composition of attack depends upon conditions UrmiSinhaRay 1 Link to comment
speedheat Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 8 hours ago, RAZPOR said: Don't be surprised if we play with a lineup with 5 spinners ,two fast bowlers and Rayudu and Raina in the middle order in the WC in England. This team management and selectors are capable of anything. have already prepared myself for such kind of idiocy from team management ROFL. raki05 and UrmiSinhaRay 1 1 Link to comment
beetle Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 21 hours ago, raki05 said: + He throw no balls and laughs like an idiot. He doesn't take catch on his own bowling. After commuting any blunder he chew his collar as if it was others mistake. If he had a thigh...he would be doing a thigh slap too. Sgattick10, UrmiSinhaRay and raki05 1 2 Link to comment
beetle Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 On 9/22/2018 at 3:24 AM, lamellavig said: Chahal cannot be dropped Of the bowlers...chahal is the most easily droppable ( not counting thakur here) Not so effective in bowling . Bad fielder in general and worse against his own bowling. A spinner bowling no balls is unpardonable . Can't hold a bat if required . UrmiSinhaRay, raki05 and Frustrated 1 2 Link to comment
raki05 Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 (edited) Chahal is super useless, due to novelty factor and SA ,eng doesn't play spin well he has not been thrashed quite frequently as of now. But he is no different than mishra once batsmen goes after him, he also is the bad fielder and can't hold the bat. Worst of all this idiot ball no balls in every match. Edited September 23, 2018 by raki05 Frustrated, Suhaan, WeStMiDz and 2 others 1 1 3 Link to comment
Suhaan Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 Khaleel has to be groomed before wc as he can be the attacking third left seamer,Chahal is not needed at all in the sceheme of things UrmiSinhaRay and Frustrated 2 Link to comment
Pollack Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 Dropping Chahal would be idiocy. Yes he could break into pieces given the physique. UrmiSinhaRay and Frustrated 1 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now