Jump to content

I feel bad to be not part of the one-day team, says Ishant Sharma


Switchblade

Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

https://www.crictracker.com/i-feel-bad-to-be-not-part-of-the-one-day-team-says-ishant-sharma/

“It hurts to be ignored for limited-overs cricket. I feel bad to be not part of the one-day team. I want to play all three formats. But I can’t control. If I get frustrated and keep thinking that I am just a Test player, then it would affect my Test cricket,” Ishant told The Times of India.

 

“I am 30 right now. I don’t know if I will be on the next tour as I will be 34 then. I’ll give whatever I have in me. Anyway, I always go for a kill as you don’t get a second chance playing for your country,” he added.

 

He is the most experienced pacer in this Indian attack and has taken up the responsibility to not just set his own fields but also helps the other bowlers suggesting the lines and lengths they should be bowling.

“I share my experience. I can set the field and tell other bowlers about the lengths to bowl. I try to ensure that once they become seniors, they can be good seniors. I can tell you that I am mature. I can set my fields and bowl according to the situations. As you grow old, the body has a lot of wear and tear. It’s all about your mental state,” he said.

Ishant will be in action when Team India takes on Australia in the first Test of the four-match series on December 16 in Adelaide.

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Switchblade said:

Don't understand that how he feels entitled that he should be part of the team was rubbish for so long in ODI format.

was for sure better than someone like Umesh and BK.  stats dont lie

Edited by rkt.india
Posted
12 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

was for sure better than someone like Umesh and BK.  stats dont lie

How was he better at par perhaps he was getting smashed in 2013 at home on those flat decks where 350 was chased or after that he was taken for plenty by Kiwis during that away tour then even in 2016 Australia so on what basis should he be selected?

Posted
25 minutes ago, Switchblade said:

How was he better at par perhaps he was getting smashed in 2013 at home on those flat decks where 350 was chased or after that he was taken for plenty by Kiwis during that away tour then even in 2016 Australia so on what basis should he be selected?

All got thrashed on those pitches.  

Posted
32 minutes ago, Forever Indian said:

The nail in the coffin for Ishant was laid by Faulkner when he smashed him for 30 in an over. Although not a terrible ODI bowler, that sealed the deal for him.

ACtually his test career was ruined by ODIs and T20s. I remember in this forum or some other place that before 2007 first edition IPL that his line is going to get screwed up. Then he became "short and wide" sharma. He was predominantly an inswing bowler. Over a period he went far away.

 

 

Posted

When on song Ishan't inswingers are hard to handle. There was once Badrinath looked like a tailender against Ishant sharma. He just didn't have clue against his inswingers. Alas. He never perfected it. He never complemented with an away going delivery or any other variation. Just a thoughtless bowler with no plan for the best part of his career.

Posted
50 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

All got thrashed on those pitches.  

I know those were flat wickets but still doesn’t change the fact that Ishant was rubbish in Loi format same with others as well not defending them.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Switchblade said:

I know those were flat wickets but still doesn’t change the fact that Ishant was rubbish in Loi format same with others as well not defending them.

ODI requires lot more thinking than Tests. It is an alien concept for him. Only good thing is he can remain injury free for a very long time.

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

ODI requires lot more thinking than Tests. It is an alien concept for him. Only good thing is he can remain injury free for a very long time.

Plus Ishant isn’t the brightest of guys when giving statements to media

Posted
4 hours ago, rkt.india said:

was for sure better than someone like Umesh and BK.  stats dont lie

We disagreed then & disagree now :p:

 

He bowled the usual short balls which would get caught at times to boost his SR and there were also those instances when he had absolutely no answer to someone getting a grip of his monotonous length. 

 

Even Balaji used to produce the same short stuff and get some caught on the ropes here & there, doesn't mean he was any good.

Posted

Its better if he concentrates in just one format I.e the tests ,if he plays more formats I think his performances in test cricket might hit a low. There is no doubt though that atm I'd take him over bhuvi in odis lol 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...