Jump to content

Michael Vaughan places Virat Kohli above Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara: I haven't seen anyone better


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, zen said:

 

 

*Sachin Fanboy mode on*

 

We should also account for innings where Sachin was wrongly given out.  Surely, it is not Sachin's fault to suffer for umpiring mistakes? And then he played in ODIs too, where Lara was not too serious. If Sachin too focused on tests more and was less serious about ODIs, his average could have been even higher in tests

 

After removing his initial and later tests, and adding an avg of 5 runs for innings where he was given out wrongly, and adding 5 more to his tally as if he had focused on tests more he would have averaged more, his avg is now 67 from 177 tests 

 

Lara was always lucky. Even when he was out, umpires gave him not out. Opposition dropped his catches too and failed to appeal when he was LBW. That added approx. 5 runs to his avg. So if we subtract that, Lara's average would be roughly 48. Accounting for factors not thought of yet (as I am too busy trying to figure out how to show Sachin stats in better light), I will subtract 1 more run from Lara's average to make it 47

 

This means Sachin averaged 67 and Lara 47. As we can see the average difference is 20 

 

And the basket of bowlers, who started out in 90s, is not representative enough. BD and Zim bowlers performed equally well when playing against Ind. In fact, bowlers peak when they bowl to Sachin so even a minnow bowler turns into a McGrath or a Warne. And McGrath and Warne crap in their pants when they bowl to Sachin so they become more like minnow bowlers. Sachin average is less when McGrath + Warne are in the 11 but that is more due to Sachin playing loose shots to these scared bowlers than these bowlers getting him out. Considering this, we should create a basket of bowlers from Zim and BD 

 

We can also add runs or 100s from all formats. That would easily bury Lara in tests

 

There is no way Lara can be better in tests. I have watched both of them and Sachin was better. I may be an Indian cricket team supporter but I am even a bigger cricket supporter so my impartial analysis, along with what I have seen, says that Sachin was definitely better

 

There is a reason why Sachin is referred to as God of Cricket in India. Have you seen Lara (or any non-Indian great) being referred to as God of Cricket in Ind? That also shows Sachin is better. Just think, how can a large percentage of 1.3B people be wrong?  

 

*Sachin Fanboy mode off* 

 

 

 

Back to reality, apples to apples:

 

Excluding BD and Zim, Lara has played 224 innings: 

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Primary team West Indies remove West Indies from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or India remove India from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query or Sri Lankaremove Sri Lanka from query
ulOrdered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1990-2006 131 232 6 11953 400* 52.88 19753 60.51 34 48 17 1559 88 Profile
filtered 1990-2006 126 224 6 11517 400* 52.83 19211 59.95 32 47 17 1504 81

 

 

Similarly, Tendulkar at his 224th inning vs these sides:

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query or Sri Lanka remove Sri Lanka from query or West Indies remove West Indies from query
Start of match date less than or equal to 13 Aug 2008 remove less than or equal to 13 Aug 2008 from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0  
unfiltered 1989-2013 200 329 33 15921 248* 53.78 51 68 14 Profile
filtered 1989-2008 136 224 21 10403 241* 51.24 33 46 13

 

  • This is apples to apples at the completion of their respective 224 innings mark
  • They have the same # of 50+ scores with Lara having a 50 more, while Tendulkar has a 100 more. Therefore, both of them are equally consistent 
  • Lara has scored 1114 more! (highlights the ability to score bigger 100s) 
  • Lara averages 53 with just 6 not outs; Tendulkar averages 51 with 21 not outs

 

you can conclude what ever you want... it is your right .....  as I maintain I am not here to win in arguement against any body .The data I put forward  appealed in common sense as most sensible to me, and hence my placing of Sachin above Lara. For that you need not stereotype    people with different opinions with     'Sachin Fanboy' label etc etc .That is cheap,silly, immature  LKG kid mentality. You put forward various data in table form. And I appreciated the facts involved in these data , though I didn't accept with the basic criteria. That's all , isn't it??? So you believe in your conslusions , and  I  shall stick with my conclusions. That's it.

Edited by rtmohanlal
Link to comment
9 hours ago, zen said:

 

 

*Sachin Fanboy mode on*

 

We should also account for innings where Sachin was wrongly given out.  Surely, it is not Sachin's fault to suffer for umpiring mistakes? And then he played in ODIs too, where Lara was not too serious. If Sachin too focused on tests more and was less serious about ODIs, his average could have been even higher in tests

 

After removing his initial and later tests, and adding an avg of 5 runs for innings where he was given out wrongly, and adding 5 more to his tally as if he had focused on tests more he would have averaged more, his avg is now 67 from 177 tests 

 

Lara was always lucky. Even when he was out, umpires gave him not out. Opposition dropped his catches too and failed to appeal when he was LBW. That added approx. 5 runs to his avg. So if we subtract that, Lara's average would be roughly 48. Accounting for factors not thought of yet (as I am too busy trying to figure out how to show Sachin stats in better light), I will subtract 1 more run from Lara's average to make it 47

 

This means Sachin averaged 67 and Lara 47. As we can see the average difference is 20 

 

And the basket of bowlers, who started out in 90s, is not representative enough. BD and Zim bowlers performed equally well when playing against Ind. In fact, bowlers peak when they bowl to Sachin so even a minnow bowler turns into a McGrath or a Warne. And McGrath and Warne crap in their pants when they bowl to Sachin so they become more like minnow bowlers. Sachin average is less when McGrath + Warne are in the 11 but that is more due to Sachin playing loose shots to these scared bowlers than these bowlers getting him out. Considering this, we should create a basket of bowlers from Zim and BD 

 

We can also add runs or 100s from all formats. That would easily bury Lara in tests

 

There is no way Lara can be better in tests. I have watched both of them and Sachin was better. I may be an Indian cricket team supporter but I am even a bigger cricket supporter so my impartial analysis, along with what I have seen, says that Sachin was definitely better

 

There is a reason why Sachin is referred to as God of Cricket in India. Have you seen Lara (or any non-Indian great) being referred to as God of Cricket in Ind? That also shows Sachin is better. Just think, how can a large percentage of 1.3B people be wrong?  

 

*Sachin Fanboy mode off* 

 

 

 

Back to reality, apples to apples:

 

Excluding BD and Zim, Lara has played 224 innings: 

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Primary team West Indies remove West Indies from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or India remove India from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query or Sri Lankaremove Sri Lanka from query
ulOrdered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1990-2006 131 232 6 11953 400* 52.88 19753 60.51 34 48 17 1559 88 Profile
filtered 1990-2006 126 224 6 11517 400* 52.83 19211 59.95 32 47 17 1504 81

 

 

Similarly, Tendulkar at his 224th inning vs these sides:

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query or Sri Lanka remove Sri Lanka from query or West Indies remove West Indies from query
Start of match date less than or equal to 13 Aug 2008 remove less than or equal to 13 Aug 2008 from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 0  
unfiltered 1989-2013 200 329 33 15921 248* 53.78 51 68 14 Profile
filtered 1989-2008 136 224 21 10403 241* 51.24 33 46 13

 

  • This is apples to apples at the completion of their respective 224 innings mark
  • They have the same # of 50+ scores with Lara having a 50 more, while Tendulkar has a 100 more. Therefore, both of them are equally consistent 
  • Lara has scored 1114 more! (highlights the ability to score bigger 100s) 
  • Lara averages 53 with just 6 not outs; Tendulkar averages 51 with 21 not outs

 

Dude you are the person who invented RPT just to put sachin down. You calling others terms like fanboys hazam nahi hoti. Sachin has gone down in history as one of the best ever and most experts agree he was better than lara, wisden has him as 2nd best batsmen after bradman.

 

Your mental gymnastics and typing big posts on ICF is not gonna change that

Link to comment
6 hours ago, rtmohanlal said:

you can conclude what ever you want... it is your right .....  as I maintain I am not here to win in arguement against any body .The data I put forward  appealed in common sense as most sensible to me, and hence my placing of Sachin above Lara. For that you need not stereotype    people with different opinions with     'Sachin Fanboy' label etc etc .That is cheap,silly, immature  LKG kid mentality. You put forward various data in table form. And I appreciated the facts involved in these data , though I didn't accept with the basic criteria. That's all , isn't it??? So you believe in your conslusions , and  I  shall stick with my conclusions. That's it.

Most experts, past and present players, wisden, history books, all place sachin above Lara. But @zen does not so I guess everyone else is a fan boy.

 

I have always mentioned its better to be a fanboy than dislike someone so much you have to come up with stuff like RPT 

Link to comment
28 minutes ago, CSK Fan said:

Most experts, past and present players, wisden, history books, all place sachin above Lara. But @zen does not so I guess everyone else is a fan boy.

 

I have always mentioned its better to be a fanboy than dislike someone so much you have to come up with stuff like RPT 

more importantly it is about the  matter of  ' precious time,effort & mental disturbance' . I am only willing to welcome different opinions with out any hesitation. But it is when people stoops to the levels of  'immature  dumb asses  ' to make others accept their  claims at any cost that I have serious problems. That is extremely irritating  & frustrating from every point of view. Along with it comes  stereotyping   

people with labels like 'fanboys' etc etc.As per general perception, people who are aged at least 21, can't label others as 'fan boys' etc etc whom they  differ with their opinions.  It makes one wonder as to  whether the persons with whom we are debating are some immature LKG kids or not. It would be  so better if these type of people do not come to arguements for a start.

Link to comment

More fun facts .... vs the 4 strongest teams that both of them played against

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query or Sri Lanka remove Sri Lanka from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 1989 and 1 Jan 2014 remove between 1 Jan 1989 and 1 Jan 2014 from query
Totals in terms of batting team switch totals
Ordered by win/loss ratio (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 6 of 6   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied Draw W/LDescending Ave RPO Inns HS LS  
Australia 1989-2013 280 161 59 0 60 2.728 38.84 3.30 506 735 47 investigate this query
South Africa 1992-2013 209 101 50 0 58 2.020 37.44 3.04 368 682 84 investigate this query
Pakistan 1989-2014 199 75 65 0 59 1.153 32.84 3.06 357 765 49 investigate this query
England 1989-2013 293 106 98 0 89 1.081 33.44 3.04 539 710 46

 

 

Lara

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Primary team West Indies remove West Indies from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1990-2006 131 232 6 11953 400* 52.88 19753 60.51 34 48 17 1559 88 Profile
filtered 1990-2006 90 164 5 8686 400* 54.62 14185 61.23 24 34 12 1183 64

 

 

Tendulkar

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1989-2013 200 329 33 15921 248* 53.78 29437+ 54.04* 51 68 14 2058+ 69 Profile
filtered 1989-2013 114 199 18 8963 241* 49.51 16727 53.58 27 41 9 1174 42

 

 

  • Lara averages 54.62 w/ just 5 not outs
  • Tendulkar averages 49.51 with 18 not outs (Avg falls below 50)

 

/discussion

 

:dontknow:

 

 

Edited by zen
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, zen said:

More fun facts .... vs the 4 strongest teams that both of them played against

 

View overall figures [change view]
Primary team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or New Zealand remove New Zealand from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query or Sri Lanka remove Sri Lanka from query
Start of match date between 1 Jan 1989 and 1 Jan 2014 remove between 1 Jan 1989 and 1 Jan 2014 from query
Totals in terms of batting team switch totals
Ordered by win/loss ratio (descending)
Page 1 of 1 Showing 1 - 6 of 6   First pageFirst Previous pagePrevious Next Next page Last Last page dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Overall figures
Team Span Mat Won Lost Tied Draw W/LDescending Ave RPO Inns HS LS  
Australia 1989-2013 280 161 59 0 60 2.728 38.84 3.30 506 735 47 investigate this query
South Africa 1992-2013 209 101 50 0 58 2.020 37.44 3.04 368 682 84 investigate this query
Pakistan 1989-2014 199 75 65 0 59 1.153 32.84 3.06 357 765 49 investigate this query
England 1989-2013 293 106 98 0 89 1.081 33.44 3.04 539 710 46

 

 

Lara

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Primary team West Indies remove West Indies from query
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1990-2006 131 232 6 11953 400* 52.88 19753 60.51 34 48 17 1559 88 Profile
filtered 1990-2006 90 164 5 8686 400* 54.62 14185 61.23 24 34 12 1183 64

 

 

Tendulkar

Records type batting analysis [change type]
View career summary [change view]
Opposition team Australia remove Australia from query or England remove England from query or Pakistan remove Pakistan from query or South Africa remove South Africa from query
Ordered by default (ascending)
dblBakArwB.gifReturn to query menu
dblBakArwW.gifCleared query menu
Career averages
  Span Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s  
unfiltered 1989-2013 200 329 33 15921 248* 53.78 29437+ 54.04* 51 68 14 2058+ 69 Profile
filtered 1989-2013 114 199 18 8963 241* 49.51 16727 53.58 27 41 9 1174 42

 

 

  • Lara averages 54.62 w/ just 5 not outs
  • Tendulkar averages 49.51 with 18 not outs (Avg falls below 50)

 

:dontknow:

 

 

just curious... how old are you??

Link to comment
Just now, rtmohanlal said:

just curious... how old are you??

probably older than you based on the fact that you have resorted to personal attacks (another Sachin fanboy hallmark) .... and you  are posting as if those who think Lara is is better should not be posting stats 

 

Get your head checked :winky:

 

 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, zen said:

probably older than you based on the fact that you have resorted to personal attacks (another Sachin fanboy hallmark) .... and you  are posting as if those who think Lara is is better should not be posting stats 

 

Get your head checked :winky:

 

 

ohh yes...   labelling  as  'Sachin fan boy' , terming 'clueless' etc were started by me... is n't it?????    Also you are  now creating fancy stories like you  are posting as if those who think Lara is is better should not be posting stats. I infact only  said ' I appreciate posting stats but I can't always agree with the criteria put forward.'

So it can be easily understood as to who needs a head checking.. So ... let's stop for now .... not interested in further discussion.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, rtmohanlal said:

ohh yes...   labelling  as  'Sachin fan boy' , terming 'clueless' etc were started by me... is n't it?????    Also you are  now creating fancy stories like you  are posting as if those who think Lara is is better should not be posting stats. I infact only  said ' I appreciate posting stats but I can't always agree with the criteria put forward.'

So it can be easily understood as to who needs a head checking.. So ... let's stop for now .... not interested in further discussion.

cool down kid .... I understand it is a shock to see Tendulkar's avg fall below 50 vs the top 4 sides but it will sink in :nod:

Link to comment
On 12/18/2018 at 7:00 PM, CG said:

I admire Kohli's Mental Strength and His Work Ethic.He is Like Steve Waugh.On Tough Pitches His Concentration Makes Him Great.He Has Struggled Against Spin.As a Batsman He Does not use his feet or sweep against spin.Neither he plays the cut or has many Blackfoot strokes but his Front foot defence and Strokes are at different level.

Sent from my Nokia 7 plus using Tapatalk
 

true,virat's mental strength is next to none but his range of shots in tests are not wide ,his approach is a bit  rigid at times .guys like sachin ,Lara would manufacture shots and at their peaks user to manhandle great spinners ,kohli I am afraid is not great against spinners ,very effective but not great .

 

He does not manufacture shots like sweep,reverse sweep ,late cuts etc that's why i say he is too rigid in his approach ,guys like younis,sachin,Lara would sweep and cut Lyon into oblivion 

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, Adi BB said:

true,virat's mental strength is next to none but his range of shots in tests are not wide ,his approach is a bit  rigid at times .guys like sachin ,Lara would manufacture shots and at their peaks user to manhandle great spinners ,kohli I am afraid is not great against spinners ,very effective but not great .

 

He does not manufacture shots like sweep,reverse sweep ,late cuts etc that's why i say he is too rigid in his approach ,guys like younis,sachin,Lara would sweep and cut Lyon into oblivion 

his only resort to spinners is lunge forward as far as he can.  he struggle to read he length against spinners and does not go back and across like Dravid and SRT used to go.  They would quickly rock back and cut the ball and would only lunge forwards if it the ball was too full.  Like his dismissal in last innings, he could have easily played that on  backfoot.  the best way to play an off spinner is back and across and on the backfoot. 

Edited by rkt.india
Link to comment
3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

his only resort to spinners is lunge forward as far as he can.  he struggle to read he length against spinners and does not go back and across like Dravid and SRT used to go.  They would quickly rock back and cut the ball and would only lunge forwards if it the ball was too full.  Like his dismissal in last innings, he could have easily played that on  backfoot.  the best way to play an off spinner is back and across and on the backfoot. 

It is funny not a single Indian batsman does that. Having seen the likes of Azharuddin, Sidhu, Tendulkar, Dravid, Sehwag who all could play against the turn of the ball at will, this is a shocking scenario.

Link to comment
13 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Unless Kohli turns into one of those 1 in 10 players who have better careers in their 30s than 20s, there is no chance in Tests. Kohli is a very good, but by no stretch is he even in an alltime great conversation. He's faced far weaker bowling lineups in general and he has obvious technical flaws that are much bigger than Lara's or Tendulkar's (which is non-existent for Tendy). 

 

Nope all that is bs. Sorry not interested in arguing here.

Link to comment
12 hours ago, Jamadagni said:

But Kohli performed suerbly against two best fast bowling teams(AUS&SA). He did well against Rabada, Philander, Steyn, Ngidi, Johnson, Harris, Starc, Cummins, Hazelwood. In fact, I don't think Sachin ever performed or even faced a complete pace bowling attack like Kohli did this year alone in SA(Rabada, Philander, Ngidi) and AUS(Starc, Hazelwood, Cummins). So that argument of weaker bowling lineups has no merit. Kohli has just entered his peak years. There's quite a few more left. I expect him to up his average to around 58 in the next 3-4 years and a small decline for a year or two, ending up with an average  between 56-57, which would surely place him above Sachin. 

 

 

Top post. Strictly based on facts from the past few series never seen an Indian batsman dominate good pace attacks in testing conditions like Kohli. Even dravid was a bit more subdued..others not nearly good enough.

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

his only resort to spinners is lunge forward as far as he can.  he struggle to read he length against spinners and does not go back and across like Dravid and SRT used to go.  They would quickly rock back and cut the ball and would only lunge forwards if it the ball was too full.  Like his dismissal in last innings, he could have easily played that on  backfoot.  the best way to play an off spinner is back and across and on the backfoot. 

Yup kohli is a great backfoot player ,why doesn't he play Lyon and off spinners on the backfoot  in India he played moen and Rashid very well 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...