Jump to content

If we get a slow Pitch like this again we shud play jadeja ahead of Kuldeep


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Kuldeep did his bit today, he was hard to get away. But yeah whenever wristys don't pick a we feel shortchanged, such has been standards set.

 

 

So KJ has to make way? If we remove his batting today, tbf he did score a fifty, WTH has he done in  games except a solitary Finch run out! If KJ isn't bowling regularly he has to make way for Pant or Jadeja, his one good day in the field isn't enough to keep the spot for more important games!

Posted

Do some of the clueless morons in this forum realize we cant replace Jadhav or Shankar with a bowler. We already have 5 bowlers, 6th bowler who can bat a bit like Jadeja will only lengthen the tail and he wont get to bowl many overs anyway. IMO if anyone has to go, it has to be Shankar in place of a batsman like DK or Pant because Shankar is not bowling anyway.

 

Kuldeep is a strike bowler and teams are still not sure how to play against him and choosing the safe route by taking singles. Granted he could have an off day but he could provide the breakthroughs in the middle overs and win the game for you.

Posted
44 minutes ago, R!TTER said:

So KJ has to make way? If we remove his batting today, tbf he did score a fifty, WTH has he done in  games except a solitary Finch run out! If KJ isn't bowling regularly he has to make way for Pant or Jadeja, his one good day in the field isn't enough to keep the spot for more important games!

Kudos to his knock yesterday but it was hardly convincing. Pant has to come in for Jadhav.

Posted
1 hour ago, SK_IH said:

Kuldeep did his bit today, he was hard to get away. But yeah whenever wristys don't pick a we feel shortchanged, such has been standards set.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Stuge said:

Kuldeep bowled really well . Unfortunately ,he couldn't get  a single wicket.

yes he did.........m not saying he bowled bad or throw him.....m clearly saying on slow pitch since kuldeep bowling suits pitches which has pace and jadeja is better on such pitches coz of the pace at which he bowls. Their is a reason that kuldeep has started putting more body in his action to get more zip but thats still a work in progress 

Posted
7 hours ago, Khota said:

I am not convinced Shankar can bat and his Captain does not think he can bowl. Houston we have a problem.

ur not convinced that all rounder exist but yet shakib is turning into one of the best players of the tournament 

Posted
1 hour ago, Stuge said:

Kuldeep bowled really well . Unfortunately ,he couldn't get  a single wicket.

Kuldeep was the worst bowler yesterday, bowled too short. Got away. He might do better against WI.

Posted
1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

Kuldeep was the worst bowler yesterday, bowled too short. Got away. He might do better against WI.

he could have got wicket or two as well.

Posted
48 minutes ago, SK_IH said:

Kudos to his knock yesterday but it was hardly convincing. Pant has to come in for Jadhav.

Pant can only replace Dhoni. 

Posted

Slow or placid ,Jadeja will be massacred in upcoming matches,he is as bad as Jadhav,VS

He is basically wasting one of three spots,other two are wasted by above names

Yeah,he is little better as a package against Jadhav

He shouldn't be competing against our wristys,as they are our main wicket takers in middle overs,problem is we have made mistakes originally by giving spots to Jadhav,VS and Jadeja

Posted
2 hours ago, SK_IH said:

Kuldeep did his bit today, he was hard to get away. But yeah whenever wristys don't pick a we feel shortchanged, such has been standards set.

 

 

Yeah both kulcha have set such high standards that we berate even decent performances. 

During ashwina and jaddu era ,10-39-0 would have been hailed as a great performance because they were so bad in general 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, jf1gp_1 said:

Well then same should logic should be applicable for Rahul who in ODIs have opened only a handful times or pant who's place in 15 should be questioned based on his ODI stats. My point is few of our players have limited experience and they will make mistakes. 

Rahul has been around for a while. Shankar has not been.

Edited by Khota
Posted

Usually not a supporter of Jadeja but looking at the purchase Shakib is getting..might not be a bad option to try Jadeja who is a similar kind of bowler.

However this need not be at the expense of Kuldeep,but perhaps JaPa combo in place of KeSha

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, GautiMaan said:

Usually not a supporter of Jadeja but looking at the purchase Shakib is getting..might not be a bad option to try Jadeja who is a similar kind of bowler.

Same here m not a supporter of jaddu specially over kuldeep but its a condition based suggestion 

5 minutes ago, GautiMaan said:

However this need not be at the expense of Kuldeep,but perhaps JaPa combo in place of KeSha

Kesha are batsman who can bowl and jadeja a bowler who can bat so thats not going to happen

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Same here m not a supporter of jaddu specially over kuldeep but its a condition based suggestion 

Kesha are batsman who can bowl and jadeja a bowler who can bat so thats not going to happen

That's where Pant comes in to address the batting imbalance.

 

Jadeja bowling > KeSha bowling,this is a fact

 

Pant + Jadeja batting > KeSha batting? this needs to be found out,hopefully before knockouts.

Edited by GautiMaan
Posted
5 minutes ago, GautiMaan said:

That's where Pant comes in to address the batting imbalance.

 

Jadeja bowling > KeSha bowling,this is a fact

 

Pant + Jadeja batting > KeSha batting? this needs to be found out,hopefully before knockouts.

Pant we dont knw ...but jadeja has been one of the worse bats we knw from a decade. Jadhav n shankar are far better batsman then jaddu . 

Posted (edited)

Jadeja has a serious case to play in Birmingham against Eng n Bang  ...its turning a lot and in commentary naseer hussain was saying Jeetan patel the off spinners picks a lot of wkts here for his county 

Edited by Ankit_sharma03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...