Downright Pathetic Umpiring in WC 2019

[Stuge]

Even with technology, umpiring is downright Pathetic to say the least .

 

How was it conclusive evidence to reverse the decision of on field umpire and give out ? 

 

Edited June 27, 2019 by Stuge

[express bowling]

Pathetic 3rd umpiring by Michael Gough of England. 

 

There was no conclusive evidence that it was edged.  

[zen]

Did not see it live but there appears to be s faint edge. The ultra edge shows a spike at the point where bat and ball just cross 

[rkt.india]

3 minutes ago, zen said:

Did not see it live but there appears to be s faint edge. The ultra edge shows a spike at the point where bat and ball just cross 

Ball brushes the pad, not bat. Spike is of that.

[sage]

Even the greatest Rohit fan in myself recognises the edge. 

[zen]

1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

Ball brushes the pad, not bat. Spike is of that.

Earlier frame if you pause it shows a spike where the ball is passing the bat. At the frame, you cannot see the pitch b/w the bat and ball as well .... I would count it as a faint edge 

[ShoonyaSifar]

Was pathetic decision. No way conclusive evidence. 

[Stuge]

6 minutes ago, zen said:

Earlier frame if you pause it shows a spike where the ball is passing the bat. At the frame, you cannot see the pitch b/w the bat and ball as well .... I would count it as a faint edge 

There is no conclusive evidence to over turn the decision ..Even on field umpire was surprised .Their umpires don't folllow their own rules .

[zen]

Just now, Stuge said:

There is no conclusive evidence to over turn the decision ..Even on field umpire was surprised .Their umpires don't folllow their own rules .

It is conclusive. The ultra edge shows a spike and bat is not near the pad nor it is hitting the ground. If you pause the frame where the ball and bat connect a) Ultraedge shows a spike, b) you cannot see a gap b/w bat and ball 

[rkt.india]

11 minutes ago, zen said:

Earlier frame if you pause it shows a spike where the ball is passing the bat. At the frame, you cannot see the pitch b/w the bat and ball as well .... I would count it as a faint edge 

at the first fame, both bat and pad are together.  you cannot convincingly say it hit the bat or pad.  On-field decision was not out and there is no conclusive evidence, on-field decision stands.  These are the rules of DRS.

[zen]

3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

at the first fame, both bat and pad are together.  you cannot convincingly say it hit the bat or pad.  On-field decision was not out and there is no conclusive evidence, on-field decision stands.  These are the rules of DRS.

It hit the bat 

[Pratik77]

It's Rohit then it's out...

[Stuge]

5 minutes ago, zen said:

It hit the bat 

it didn't

[zen]

3 minutes ago, Stuge said:

it didn't

You can feel otherwise but it would correctly show as caught Hope 

Edited June 27, 2019 by zen

[rkt.india]

12 minutes ago, zen said:

It hit the bat 

had it hit the bat, spike would have been more pronounced.

[zen]

1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

had it hit the bat, spike would have been more pronounced.

Good to see that you can now see the spike too! 

[rkt.india]

3 minutes ago, zen said:

Good to see that you can now see the spike too! 

Every one can see the spike but spike is there because it hit the pad and not the bat.  spike of the bat would be more pronounced.

[zen]

4 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Every one can see the spike but spike is there because it hit the pad and not the bat.  spike of the bat would be more pronounced.

A faint edge! Thank you!! 

Edited June 27, 2019 by zen

[Stuge]

 

 

Sharmaji is pissed off for sure .

[vvvslaxman]

There was a clear gap  between and bat and pad lol i see someone trying to see things that are not there hahaha