Jump to content

Afretard: ‘ Padosi mulk should know Pathans have ruled neighbours but never been ruled ‘


rangeelaraja

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

This duffer even mentions Hepthalites as ruling India. What he forgets is that they never ruled India but ruled them. So much for the invincibility of pashtuns

 

 

Hepthalites weren't even Pashtuns to begin so I don't even understand why would he bring them into the argument. 

While Huns did have a short reign over small parts of northern India, their power couldn't last long thanks to the strong local resistance. Yashovarman gave the final blow and Huns were completely defeated. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, panther said:

Because that's how things rolled, Mahmud Of ghaznavi Invaded India with Turks, Afghans and hindus, why do you think there are so many Afghan Decendants All over India, they came with various kings and settled down.

 

Nader shah was Turk, but he Invaded India with Mostly Abdali pashtuns.

Bhai Afghanis look Indian. I have seen Jains of North India who effectively, communitywise are less darker, some have blonde and ginger hairs. Jains also have relatively high percentage of bown and blue eyes.  So if anything, not a single Afghani girl look like Iranian girls. I don’t see boyz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mishra said:

Bhai Afghanis look Indian. I have seen Jains of North India who effectively, communitywise are less darker, some have blonde and ginger hairs. Jains also have relatively high percentage of bown and blue eyes.  So if anything, not a single Afghani girl look like Iranian girls. I don’t see boyz.

There's the skin color concept again. If Indians or Afghans were dark as the night will it make any difference. We are discussing people in general. Now you yourself are getting baited by him after your warning. Also stop this bhai nonsense. Pakistanis don't consider us bhais

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

There's the skin color concept again. If Indians or Afghans were dark as the night will it make any difference. We are discussing people in general. Now you yourself are getting baited by him after your warning. Also stop this bhai nonsense. Pakistanis don't consider us bhais

:(( Pyaar se danda dete raho. Always ask , are you ok, lagee to nahi :((

scientific evidence shows, home sapiens from Africa screwed Homo Erecus which lived in Afghanistan/ Indian peninsula and neathendrals of Europe. So level of blackness represents maculanity. That where i was taking him. Chitiyapa with Chutiyapa

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mishra said:

Bhai Afghanis look Indian. I have seen Jains of North India who effectively, communitywise are less darker, some have blonde and ginger hairs. Jains also have relatively high percentage of bown and blue eyes.  So if anything, not a single Afghani girl look like Iranian girls. I don’t see boyz.

Some do, but most don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stradlater said:

Basically the reason why Mughals were successfully able to withstand and crush the long Pakhtoon rebellion first under Akbar and later under Jahangir was because of tenacity and firm resolve showed by Kachwahas and Rathores. 

 

Next time, If any Pashtun mocks Hindus , throw in the name of these two Rajput clans who despite being heavily outnumbered and who were fighting in the relatively hostile terrain with knees deep in snow, completely managed to squash the whole Afghan resistance and sent them running back to their burrows from where they only came out again a century later after Abdali managed to unite them under a single flag. 

 

Abdali himself was lucky that his raidings into Hindustan coincided with the period of basically an anarchy in the subcontinent. 

The Sikhs were divided into various Misls and were yet to emerge as a single unified power. 

The Rajputs were at their weakest battling domestic problems and fighting amongst themselves as usual when time permitted. 

And Marathas, well we all know what a terrible blunder Raghunath Rao committed when he decided to march and meet the Afghans in a fully pitched battle. But that's a topic for another day. 

The irony is, even though they gloat about Panipat, Panipat was fatal to Abdali, not the Marathas. Within 20 years of Panipat, Maratha flag was again flying over Delhi. While Abdali bemoaned the disaster of losing 40,000 Afghan tribesmen in one battle, after which he was busy putting down countless rebellions and died with his empire fragmenting. The definition of a Pyrrhic victory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, panther said:

Some do, but most don't.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.thenewsminute.com/article/pakistans-growing-paedophile-problem-and-why-some-men-think-its-not-wrong-19306%3famp

 

See the numbers yourself :(( its not some,  1 million kids is a lot when it comes to bearing masculinity of Great Pakistani Super men.

Edited by mishra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, panther said:

Sikhs never conquered Khyber that's where Afridi is from, They conquered Upto peshawar, you guys conquered like 10% of our territory and beat your chest, remember how many genocides Abdali done on you guys?

And screwd your male ancestors from back side and female on both sides....:phehe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Stradlater said:

Speaking of, Where were these brave Pashtuns when Dogra Rajput Raja of Kashmir Gulabh Singh put all the Yusufzai women in his kingdom up for sale. 

Not that I take pride in such activities but since you seem to love the genocidal tendencies of your ancestors, I thought I would mention this little episode in a passing by. 

You know they were not Yusufzais but fake 'pathans' Sudhans or whatever they call themselves, they claim pashtun Linage but are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Stradlater said:

How convenient bro. 

You won't find yusufzais in Kasmir, These sudhans speak Some Northen Punjabi Dialect they are not pashtuns, just pretenders, they claim Sadhozai Ancestry, which Is a sub tribe of the Abdali, nothing to do with Yusufzais.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Stradlater said:

Pakhtoons were basically robbers/bandits , phattus who used to ambush and raid the armies and would hide in their mountainous caverns like cowards once the tide of battle turned against them. 

The only Pashtun worth his salt was Sher Khan and ironically he was born in Bihar so as desi as they come. 

Now you are making stuff up.

Sher Khan was the tiger from Jungle book.

 

My favourite pathan is Badshah Khan from Khudagawah.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7b5AtOe78lQ

 

Edited by Mariyam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats the problem I see with a lot of Muslims nations  now a days. Living in the past. In the 6 day war with Israel in the 60s these people got a false case of security and bravado based on the past...Somebody like attaturk realised the fantasy of this narrative and abolished the caliphate and catapulted Turkey into a modern republic. 

 

this is equally true for those Indians who harp on about how India was glorious x years in the past.

 

Its exactly why I fear the chinese over Pakistan. You defeat a chinese person they will analyse where they went wrong , improve and come back at you harder. You defeat a Pakistani person, they will continue to believe in their own hype and make no improvements.

 

Work hard, make sensible policies and prosper. Battles are more and more going to be fought with the aid of technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...