Jump to content

Match Thread- IND vs NZ 1st test Feb 21-25 2020, Wellington


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Scar said:

I don't know why do I even bother :facepalm:

I think with this Indian team, there is no such thing as peak high, it's a sinusoidal wave, up and down and we go on.. 

There is a peak high. It coincides when India play all their matches on the subcontinent then dips in SENA.

Posted
10 minutes ago, SRT100 said:

The lack of hotspot was damning.

 

The noise came from bat on ground which the hotspot picked up.

 

Rubbish decision.


FFS this always happens to India.

Lets go back to Pujara review. The very same umpire kept asking for angles and zooms to check if ball hit glove. Took almost 4-5 camera angles for him to decide what was clearly not out. In case of Mayank why no such due diligence ?

Posted
3 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said:

hello? because he wasn't sure. 

You missed the point, like a plane flying over your head.

 

She is saying that because he took so long, he should be given out. FFS.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sandeep99 said:

How in this day and age not negotiate that short ball angle.. Indians gloriously underprepared 

I generally rate this guys as good short ball players. But mentally they are quiet there. Looks like a bunch of losers from associate country.

Posted
Just now, IndianRenegade said:

You wouldn't find conclusive evidence to overturn if you don't see the whole evidence.

That is what commies say. Should have been overturned. I think ICC has to revisit this "umpire's call" rule

Posted
Just now, jf1gp_1 said:

Lets go back to Pujara review. The very same umpire kept asking for angles and zooms to check if ball hit glove. Took almost 4-5 camera angles for him to decide what was clearly not out. In case of Mayank why no such due diligence ?

Exactly.. reeks of bias for the home team

Posted
Just now, jf1gp_1 said:

Lets go back to Pujara review. The very same umpire kept asking for angles and zooms to check if ball hit glove. Took almost 4-5 camera angles for him to decide what was clearly not out. In case of Mayank why no such due diligence ?

As soon as I saw no hotspot on the edge, I knew it wasnt out. I cant believe he was given out.

 

India robbed. Mayank robbed off a potential century.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

Williamson is way too reactive with his field setting. If India counterattacks smartly we can throw them off. 

This! Wack some of the balls above the heads of these close in NZ fielders, things will change. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...