Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

Do you seriously think these farm laws will prevent suicides

 

 

Farming is heavily subsidised business. There is no way any private player is going to pay more to farmers. International price of wheat is around 15 per kg while msp is 19.75. As long the rich nations are heavily subsidising it you can't do anything.

 

nobody is threatening to take away the subsidies provided to Indian farmers. again, another red herring. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Khota said:

This is your interpretation. This is what BJP has taught you. Divide and conquer.

 

They want MSP for few essential crops and that is all.

MSP is there for 22crops already 

Posted
6 hours ago, Singh bling said:

This question has been answered earlier. Farmers are afraid that once private sector enter they will give incentive for few years which will lead closure of mandi's and after that they will be mercy of those private players.

 

MP is already seeing steep decline in trade in mandi's and Mandi's are getting closed.

 

https://www.newsclick.in/Fallout-Farm-Laws-New-Laws-Paralyse-70%-MP-Mandis-Six-Months

 

 


There are people who are afraid that blubonic plague will return. This is not the answer. 
 

Any specific clause which remove mandi, forces contract farming and removes msp. 
 

Quote the clause or no bournvita for you. If they are paranoid, they need psychiatrist and not this bill. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Khota said:

Echo chamber is where you live. Real world is where farmers are barely surviving.

And You are not letting govt do something good for them.

Posted
3 hours ago, ravishingravi said:


There are people who are afraid that blubonic plague will return. This is not the answer. 
 

Any specific clause which remove mandi, forces contract farming and removes msp. 
 

Quote the clause or no bournvita for you. If they are paranoid, they need psychiatrist and not this bill. 

Either you are naive or oversmart . When government has to take something back do you think they give clause or in writing. They just silently take it back. The biggest example is LPG gas subsidy. Earlier subsidised cylinders were available then they said subsidy will come in account. Then gas prices reduced to level of subsidised cylinder and they said no need for subsidy . At that time price was 594. Now price has gone upto Rs.825 but still no subsidy is coming. There is no announcement or anything by government regarding increase in price of subsidised cylinder s but on ground subsidy is coming in pennies like 20-30 rs. So silently government killed subsidy.

 

Now at the time of DBT if protests happened that subsidy will not come you would have said the same thing that it's baseless fear but now fear is reality.

 

Already MP is seeing effect on mandi's.

Similarly KCR Announced closure of procurement centres citing new farm laws

https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/uttam-asks-modi-if-closure-of-procurement-centres-in-telangana-is-linked-to-farm-laws/article33814718.ece

 

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, FischerTal said:

 

nobody is threatening to take away the subsidies provided to Indian farmers. again, another red herring. 

MSP is subsidy . Hardly any private player is going to pay above it. So How will this bill increase farmers income? 

On the other hand news of mandi's closing , procurement centre closing are coming from MP, Telengana . So MSP will be harder to obtain for small farmers. 

Posted

If I ask a coal miner in USA, there's no chance in hell he would want to consider the environmental impact of his job. He will typically respond with "i work so hard" "electricity is cheap and improves lives" "what about impact of gasoline" etc. 

 

Tribal & self centered tendencies are natural, govt policy cannot be framed based solely on interest groups. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

MSP is subsidy . Hardly any private player is going to pay above it. So How will this bill increase farmers income? 

On the other hand news of mandi's closing , procurement centre closing are coming from MP, Telengana . So MSP will be harder to obtain for small farmers. 

 

so u want govt to susbidize both input and output? thats unsustainable.

Posted
5 hours ago, rkt.india said:

And You are not letting govt do something good for them.

I would love the govt. does something good for them. They do need a gauranteed support price for their crops which is more than input costs. You have free market for farming and next you know they will be forced to dump.

 

Farming is a success story in India and reforms need to be done carefully. Modi is a smart man and needs to come down a little from his high perch to deal with these disenfranchised folks.

Posted
39 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

 

so u want govt to susbidize both input and output? thats unsustainable.

Very good point. The input subsidies are being passed on to the consumers and the output subsidy is going to the farmer. Even then an average farmer is in debt and barely making 5000 pm. 

And the sticking point is about sustainability and in long term you are correct that it cannot continue on. Focus should be to develop the country so that these farmers can move to industry and work part time on the fields or something. Currently look at it as a mass employment scheme.

Posted
1 hour ago, Clarke said:

If I ask a coal miner in USA, there's no chance in hell he would want to consider the environmental impact of his job. He will typically respond with "i work so hard" "electricity is cheap and improves lives" "what about impact of gasoline" etc. 

 

Tribal & self centered tendencies are natural, govt policy cannot be framed based solely on interest groups. 

But the govt.of US is making an effort to slowly create green jobs for these people. Mining is still continuing. Modi needs to create jobs for these people and then ween them away from farming. It is being done backwards.

Posted
32 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

 

so u want govt to susbidize both input and output? thats unsustainable.

I think It's better if government discuss this with farm organisations what they want , higher input subsidies or output subsidies

Here is old interview of Mahendra Tikait who preferred higher price instead of input subsidies

https://www.downtoearth.org.in/coverage/agriculture/dont-need-subsidies-give-us-the-right-price-5084

 

 

 

 

Posted
10 hours ago, FischerTal said:

there exists a world beyond your propaganda. 

And that is a world you have yet to discover.

Posted

Again, All these protests have no meaning and cannot be taken seriously when you demand the release of umar khalid and sherjeel imam.

It shows the arrogance of the fake farmers who believe that can hold the govt and country to ransom.

No negotiation please.

Posted
10 hours ago, Singh bling said:

Do you seriously think these farm laws will prevent suicides

 

 

Farming is heavily subsidised business. There is no way any private player is going to pay more to farmers. International price of wheat is around 15 per kg while msp is 19.75. As long the rich nations are heavily subsidising it you can't do anything.


These laws opens up the market, rich nation subsidizes the growing, doesn’t set a price that farmers sell it, they use subsidies because the global market sets the price. 
 

When reforms are needed elsewhere and not so in Punjab, why are they stopping others to benefit? Let them have more controls in their state, as there is a state ministry for Agriculture. Punjab Agro output is growing negatively, while other states diversify. These people sit on MSPs and produce low quality crop which is in surplus for PDS. When government starts buying more from other states, these mandis will also stop. Coops and Wholesale markets are an option going forward

Posted
16 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:


These laws opens up the market, rich nation subsidizes the growing, doesn’t set a price that farmers sell it, they use subsidies because the global market sets the price. 
 

When reforms are needed elsewhere and not so in Punjab, why are they stopping others to benefit? Let them have more controls in their state, as there is a state ministry for Agriculture. Punjab Agro output is growing negatively, while other states diversify. These people sit on MSPs and produce low quality crop which is in surplus for PDS. When government starts buying more from other states, these mandis will also stop. Coops and Wholesale markets are an option going forward

And the global price is also based on subsidies.

 

Punjab is not stopping othres. They can go home if they chose to. This has nothing to do with Punjab. This is a struggle beween have and havenots.

Farmers vs pensionjeevis.

Posted
4 hours ago, Singh bling said:

Either you are naive or oversmart . When government has to take something back do you think they give clause or in writing. They just silently take it back. The biggest example is LPG gas subsidy. Earlier subsidised cylinders were available then they said subsidy will come in account. Then gas prices reduced to level of subsidised cylinder and they said no need for subsidy . At that time price was 594. Now price has gone upto Rs.825 but still no subsidy is coming. There is no announcement or anything by government regarding increase in price of subsidised cylinder s but on ground subsidy is coming in pennies like 20-30 rs. So silently government killed subsidy.

 

Now at the time of DBT if protests happened that subsidy will not come you would have said the same thing that it's baseless fear but now fear is reality.

 

Already MP is seeing effect on mandi's.

Similarly KCR Announced closure of procurement centres citing new farm laws

https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/uttam-asks-modi-if-closure-of-procurement-centres-in-telangana-is-linked-to-farm-laws/article33814718.ece

 

 

 

 

Neither naive not oversmart. Just a person who tends to read on the subject I am talking about. You are the other guy. But you are not alone. None of puttars has a straight answer to straight question.

 

×
×
  • Create New...