Chahal concussion sub for Jaddu- Shrewd move or Bad sportsmanship?

[G_B_]

5 hours ago, Serpico said:

First of all I'm surprised they were able to convince aussie umpires and referee for something like this.. I guess our management does have some quick thinking and persuasion skills

 

Two questions on everyone's mind:

 

1. Jaddu was allowed to bat after getting hit on helmet yet he needed a concussion sub to bowl? 

 

2. Is Chahal really like for like to Jadeja? Jaddu is much better batsman while chahal is much better bowler.. 

 

 

 

Lets look at this allowed to bat argument

 

He was out on the pitch for an extra 3 minutes before the innings was over and the physio attended to him. He faced 3 balls.

 

Its now as if he batted out entire overs.

 

Concussions take time to develop.

[Bhoot]

Great move. Cudos to the management. 

 

If it's within the rule, make full use of it. 

 

Spirit of cricket cn kiss my arse. 

 

Win matches not hearts. 

 

Blame the icc. 

Edited December 5, 2020 by Bhoot

[BacktoCricaddict]

Ya know Langer has his own rulebook that outranks the ICC one.  Rule 2.1.3.4:  Any Ozzie fielder can knock the bails off and appeal for bowled or hit-wicket.

 

[express bowling]

On 12/4/2020 at 6:05 PM, Stan AF said:

Someone throw a ball on this guy's head.

 

Does he have a head ?

[Real McCoy]

On 12/4/2020 at 5:48 PM, sage said:

 

 

On 12/4/2020 at 5:58 PM, ShoonyaSifar said:

Terrible tweet from Vaughan without knowing Jadeja's actual health condition. Sometimes concussions can take upto 24 hours for symptoms. 

 

Remember Late Raman Lamba? He walked back to the pavilion on his own after being hit, was talking, then after sometime he fell unconscious and passed away three days later. Even if Jadeja felt it was a minor injury, better not to take any risks.

 

I was shocked to see no doctor attending to him. Silly and thoughtless. 

 

On 12/4/2020 at 6:05 PM, Stan AF said:

Someone throw a ball on this guy's head.

 

25 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Does he have a head ?

 

[sandeep]

Why is CricBuzz paying Michael Vaughn if he's openly running around trolling and casting unfounded allegations on Indian team and players.

 

I mean, he's not even a good analyst - much better alternatives out there.  Fire his pale ass so he can go back to his 5 twitter followers.

[coffee_rules]

On 12/5/2020 at 9:44 AM, sandeep said:

Why is CricBuzz paying Michael Vaughn if he's openly running around trolling and casting unfounded allegations on Indian team and players.

 

I mean, he's not even a good analyst - much better alternatives out there.  Fire his pale ass so he can go back to his 5 twitter followers.

Wasim bhai ka laafa 

 

 

[nevada]

On 12/5/2020 at 8:14 PM, sandeep said:

Why is CricBuzz paying Michael Vaughn if he's openly running around trolling and casting unfounded allegations on Indian team and players.

 

I mean, he's not even a good analyst - much better alternatives out there.  Fire his pale ass so he can go back to his 5 twitter followers.

He is an annoying fecker. As soon as we lost the WC semi he started making a mockery of us. He has plenty to say on lots of things but has he spoken out about racism at Yorkshire, his former club? He seems to be a sneaky little fecker who barely conceals his contempt. 

Edited December 7, 2020 by nevada