G_B_ Posted April 3, 2021 Posted April 3, 2021 After the u turn by imran on sugar imports from india, i hope those brokering peace understand that its just words of Pakistan. Modi government played it perfectly. Responded to kind words with kind words for the global forum to see. Truth is with article 370, its pakistan that needs to always make the first move.
sandeep Posted April 3, 2021 Posted April 3, 2021 4 hours ago, G_B_ said: After the u turn by imran on sugar imports from india, i hope those brokering peace understand that its just words of Pakistan. Modi government played it perfectly. Responded to kind words with kind words for the global forum to see. Truth is with article 370, its pakistan that needs to always make the first move. There is no "move" to be made. The whole thing is a PR exercise - on both sides. New US Admin has come in, and they are once again going around the Afghanistan mulberry bush - Biden's boys will ask Pak to "co-operate" in Afg, Bajwa will beg for $$ and demand that "India reduce pressure" on them, and as a result we see some "forward movement" and "thaws" between Ind-Pak. This is more predictable than a saas-bahu soap. The only way out of this gordian knot is a major crisis that would force one side to change its position - India is not going to be shifted - we are strong enough. Pakistan is vulnerable to a lot of shocks - economic, COVID etc, but the CCP will prop them up just enough so that they stay beggars and dependent on them, while allowing them to afford the fantasy of pursuing 'Kashmir' - again, only enough so that the Feudal real estate brokers in military uniforms can stay in charge. And round and round we go. If China had not pumped in CPEC billions, Pakistan would have had its existential crisis in the 2010s, and be forced to reach permanent settlement with India and move the F on. But that would mean that India would be freed of the expensive nuisance on its western border - CCP doesn't want that, and thats why they will keep investing a couple of billions a year in 'loan deferments' for the PakMil - its super cheap and obvious way to bog down India. And its working. G_B_, ravishingravi, Mariyam and 1 other 3 1
ravishingravi Posted April 5, 2021 Posted April 5, 2021 Yea. In many ways India is done with Pakistan. Vilander 1
Vilander Posted April 5, 2021 Posted April 5, 2021 On 4/3/2021 at 9:01 AM, sandeep said: There is no "move" to be made. The whole thing is a PR exercise - on both sides. New US Admin has come in, and they are once again going around the Afghanistan mulberry bush - Biden's boys will ask Pak to "co-operate" in Afg, Bajwa will beg for $$ and demand that "India reduce pressure" on them, and as a result we see some "forward movement" and "thaws" between Ind-Pak. This is more predictable than a saas-bahu soap. The only way out of this gordian knot is a major crisis that would force one side to change its position - India is not going to be shifted - we are strong enough. Pakistan is vulnerable to a lot of shocks - economic, COVID etc, but the CCP will prop them up just enough so that they stay beggars and dependent on them, while allowing them to afford the fantasy of pursuing 'Kashmir' - again, only enough so that the Feudal real estate brokers in military uniforms can stay in charge. And round and round we go. If China had not pumped in CPEC billions, Pakistan would have had its existential crisis in the 2010s, and be forced to reach permanent settlement with India and move the F on. But that would mean that India would be freed of the expensive nuisance on its western border - CCP doesn't want that, and thats why they will keep investing a couple of billions a year in 'loan deferments' for the PakMil - its super cheap and obvious way to bog down India. And its working. Pakistan problem will not go away. They want land CCP wants land too not sure why. India needs to get stronger and make the cost unacceptable thats all. India can only worry about what it can control. Rest India should be least bothered about, the whole thing with no talks till terrorism is stopped is a good way to go about it.
Vilander Posted April 5, 2021 Posted April 5, 2021 On 4/3/2021 at 4:51 AM, G_B_ said: Truth is with article 370, its pakistan that needs to always make the first move. Article 370 made the 45 % j and K state area that is under India into a union territory. There is still Askai chin and gb under enemy rule, so its not that article 370 abolition achieved anything other that solidify status quo. India should focus on territory under enemy rule. G_B_ 1
motomaverick Posted May 8, 2021 Posted May 8, 2021 (edited) Qureshit says Article 370 is India's internal matter but Article 35A is not. What is this new bakloli coming out of Padosiland? Edited May 8, 2021 by motomaverick
Vilander Posted May 8, 2021 Posted May 8, 2021 (edited) 9 hours ago, motomaverick said: Qureshit says Article 370 is India's internal matter but Article 35A is not. What is this new bakloli coming out of Padosiland? They can say what ever the f they want. First let them explain why they changed status on ground in Pak occupied kashmir, why they ceded part of it to china lol. They have no moral right to complain abt 35a or the lack of it, jokers. Edited May 8, 2021 by Vilander
motomaverick Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 Pretty much expected of this dog called Digvijaya. Why has he not been tried for treason yet?
Yoda-esque Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 Pretty much expected of this dog called Digvijaya. Why has he not been tried for treason yet? They should never be tried because they make Modi look good
bharathh Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 Can the capable leaders in Cong pls breakaway and make an alternative national party pls! This country needs a good opposition.. not these dynastic traitors! Power hungry nincompoops Norman 1
Yoda-esque Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 Pretty much expected of this dog called Digvijaya. Why has he not been tried for treason yet? Yet some of these jokers in TN and kerala vote for Congress
Vilander Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 43 minutes ago, Yoda-esque said: 1 hour ago, motomaverick said: Pretty much expected of this dog called Digvijaya. Why has he not been tried for treason yet? Yet some of these jokers in TN and kerala vote for Congress They vote for a regional party in assembly elections not for digvijaya Singh.
coffee_rules Posted June 13, 2021 Posted June 13, 2021 On 6/12/2021 at 8:09 AM, Yoda-esque said: On 6/12/2021 at 7:10 AM, motomaverick said: Pretty much expected of this dog called Digvijaya. Why has he not been tried for treason yet? Yet some of these jokers in TN and kerala vote for Congress rkt.india 1
coffee_rules Posted January 7, 2022 Posted January 7, 2022 Setback for Pak Kashmiri UK lobby. Lord Nazir Ahmed convicted to raping young boys and girls, is banned from the House of Lords He was a vocal supporter of Kashmir in UK parliament and politics, Saala bachche baaz
Recommended Posts