Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Gollum said:

There is a saying in America that when boys watch football (NFL), men watch wrestling. It is huge in USA, Russia, China, Japan, Iran, Turkey, Cuba etc....you know countries that actually dominate sports. 

 

In USA every single school has a wrestling team comprising of the toughest kids (if any of your relatives is there ask him/her), in the Caucasus region it is like a religion preparing future Khabibs. Just because you tune in once in 4 years to watch some event or that Indians in general have no affinity towards sporting activities, doesn't mean nobody else on the planet watches or participates in it. It is an ancient sport still thriving, unsurpassed in effectiveness as can be seen from MMA results (only martial art that is compulsory in MMA), deserves respect. Moreover show respect to our wrestlers who are gonna lock horns with rest of the world, in a sport more global and competitive than cricket or hockey...that bolded bit makes zero sense over here. 

 

Medal based sports aren't BS just because you say so. 

Are you talking about WWE? Baring entertainment wrestling I have never heard of any wrestling league or world cup where crazy fans celebrate the win of their wrestler or angry fans break tv or do anything.

 

And I have respect for wrestlers but even you have to accept that none of them had not even once won gold medal in Olympics

Posted

Average crowd for D1 (college) wrestling duel

Photos: 2019 NCAA D1 Wrestling Championships Session 6 (3/23/2019) - The  Daily Iowan

 

But yeah nobody watches or participates in it. grow up, widen your horizon, just because (most of) India has zero sports culture doesn't mean ROTW is following suit. 

 

And please no lame cricket analogy, 98% cricket fandom is from a region on this planet which has close to zero accomplishments in athletics/sports.....making it an irrelevant sport. 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

Are you talking about WWE? Baring entertainment wrestling I have never heard of any wrestling league or world cup where crazy fans celebrate the win of their wrestler or angry fans break tv or do anything.

No, the one which we will see in Olympics shortly...as an extension include folkstyle, Sambo as well. Global sport, fast growing because of MMA, without wrestling there is no MMA. Literally every champion has wrestling background, grappling has firmly established dominance over striking arts in the last 15 odd years. Tens of thousands of children being put through the grind worldwide......and there are leagues though not as rich as NFL/EPL/IPL/NBA. $$$$$ or league isn't everything otherwise golf will rank higher than many sports and poker>chess.  

 

Spend time on YT, use google, you will hear of wrestling WCs, fans celebrating/crying/breaking whatever you want. Without research not wise to pass judgement. 

Quote

And I have respect for wrestlers but even you have to accept that none of them had not even once won gold medal in Olympics

Because unlike cricket, it is a global sport with much stiffer competition. Cricketers **** their pants against NZ, even Bangladesh (U-19 WC), Wrestlers will be up against warriors molded in Fargo/NCAA and bears from Dagestan. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
10 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Average crowd for D1 (college) wrestling duel

Photos: 2019 NCAA D1 Wrestling Championships Session 6 (3/23/2019) - The  Daily Iowan

 

But yeah nobody watches or participates in it. grow up, widen your horizon, just because (most of) India has zero sports culture doesn't mean ROTW is following suit. 

 

And please no lame cricket analogy, 98% cricket fandom is from a region on this planet which has close to zero accomplishments in athletics/sports.....making it an irrelevant sport. 

https://wealthygorilla.com/richest-wrestlers-world/

 

Most of them are from WWE clearly shows which wrestling Americans love the most 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Singh bling said:

https://wealthygorilla.com/richest-wrestlers-world/

 

Most of them are from WWE clearly shows which wrestling Americans love the most 

WWE isn't sports, it is entertainment. 

 

Talking about sports here. Google about Dan Gable or Dave Schultz. Or Aleksandr Karelin from Russia. 

 

Anyway I am wasting my time here. Be content with what you believe in. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gollum said:

No, the one which we will see in Olympics shortly...as an extension include folkstyle, Sambo as well. Global sport, fast growing because of MMA, without wrestling there is no MMA. Literally every champion has wrestling background, grappling has firmly established dominance over striking arts in the last 15 odd years. Tens of thousands of children being put through the grind worldwide,,,,,,and there are leagues though not as rich as NFL/EPL/IPL/NBA. $$$$$ or league isn't everything otherwise golf will rank higher than many sports and poker>chess.  

 

Spend time on YT, use google, you will hear of wrestling WCs, fans celebrating/crying/breaking whatever you want. Without research not wise to pass judgement. 

Because unlike cricket, it is a global sport with much stiffer competition. Cricketers **** their pants against NZ, even Bangladesh (U-19 WC), Wrestlers will be up against warriors molded in Fargo/NCAA and bears from Dagestan. 

Wrestling popularity in Olympic Games has dropped drastically.
Warrant:

According to IOC documents obtained by the Associated Press, wrestling ranked "low" in several of the technical criteria, including popularity with the public at the London Games -- just below 5 on a scale of 10. Wrestling sold only 100,851 tickets in London out of 116,854 available. Wrestling also ranked "low" in global TV audience with a maximum of 58.5 million viewers and an average of 23 million, the documents show. Internet hits and press coverage were also ranked as low. Previous Olympic Games have also seen lower viewership and popularity. This is sourced from ESPN article, IOC Drops Wrestling from 2020 Olympics.

According to a study done by the New York Times, Olympic wrestling popularity has in fact gone down with each passing Olympic Games. The Sydney 2000 Games saw 73.5 million viewers, the Athens 2004 Games 64 million, the Beijing 2008 Games 60.5 million. Ticket sales for wrestling matches also decreased drastically with each Olympic Games. Judge, what we're seeing here is a progressive decline in viewership and popularity of wrestling in the Olympic Games, which shows the world's decreasing interest in wrestling. This is sourced from New York Times article, Decreasing Popularity of Wrestling.

-----_----------

Yeah such a global sport that even tickets are not sold in Olympics. And global viewers of just 58.5 millions.

 

lets accept had it been so popular then Americans would not had created WWE.

 

Also don't bring MMA in it . MMA is mixtures of all fighting arts and very popular.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Singh bling said:
Wrestling popularity in Olympic Games has dropped drastically.
Warrant:

According to IOC documents obtained by the Associated Press, wrestling ranked "low" in several of the technical criteria, including popularity with the public at the London Games -- just below 5 on a scale of 10. Wrestling sold only 100,851 tickets in London out of 116,854 available. Wrestling also ranked "low" in global TV audience with a maximum of 58.5 million viewers and an average of 23 million, the documents show. Internet hits and press coverage were also ranked as low. Previous Olympic Games have also seen lower viewership and popularity. This is sourced from ESPN article, IOC Drops Wrestling from 2020 Olympics.

According to a study done by the New York Times, Olympic wrestling popularity has in fact gone down with each passing Olympic Games. The Sydney 2000 Games saw 73.5 million viewers, the Athens 2004 Games 64 million, the Beijing 2008 Games 60.5 million. Ticket sales for wrestling matches also decreased drastically with each Olympic Games. Judge, what we're seeing here is a progressive decline in viewership and popularity of wrestling in the Olympic Games, which shows the world's decreasing interest in wrestling. This is sourced from New York Times article, Decreasing Popularity of Wrestling.

-----_----------

Yeah such a global sport that even tickets are not sold in Olympics. And global viewers of just 58.5 millions.

 

2012 news (dunno what that link is), it was about to be dropped but then wasn't. 

Quote

lets accept had it been so popular then Americans would not had created WWE.

WWE is tamasha, nothing sports related. 

Quote

Also don't bring MMA in it . MMA is mixtures of all fighting arts and very popular.

Without wrestling, there is no MMA. Most important fighting art.

 

Anyway gn, getting late. 

Edited by Gollum
Posted
1 minute ago, Gollum said:

2012 news, it was about to be dropped but wasn't. 

It has some basic stats like average 23 million viewers globally. 

Posted
7 hours ago, G_B_ said:

How does spend per athlete differ between say usa or uk and japan south korea

Probably doesn't. Not by much. But USA wins far more medals. As does China, Germany, Russia and Australia.

 

UK not as much. At least according to the link @Gollum posted on the initial page.

 

Posted
17 hours ago, Dery said:

What's the point of us investing in football?

So that NRIs staying in the West can brag about India's sporting prowess?

 

On a serious note the GoI should never invest in football. We have many NPAs already. It should be from private investors and only if it makes business sense to them.

Posted
4 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Probably doesn't. Not by much. But USA wins far more medals. As does China, Germany, Russia and Australia.

 

UK not as much. At least according to the link @Gollum posted on the initial page.

 

UK/GB is 3rd overall in the alltime list of medals won in Olympics, being 2nd in the last two events..

 

Its a nation thats much much smaller than all of those in both size and population (barring Australia), how is it behind than them in sporting achievements? I think only Australia can be considered to have outperformed them, apart from the obvious ones in US and Soviets who have had better manpower and resources than the Brits.

Posted
4 hours ago, Mariyam said:

Probably doesn't. Not by much. But USA wins far more medals. As does China, Germany, Russia and Australia.

 

UK not as much. At least according to the link @Gollum posted on the initial page.

 

Ok but there are surely many variables to this.

 

Uk is active in hockey, a sport that needs plenty of infra and yields at max 2 medals. (Mens and womens). There are also no major private sector participation like football etc to offset any spend. 

 

This metric of medals per athele penalises teams who participate in team sports like hockey which are heavy spend ans unsupported by the private sector. 

 

For a country like jamaica atheletics programs are much cheaper to sponser than say participanting in hockey.

 

At best it is a very crude metric. In general countries that focus on individual events will have a lower medals to spend ratio. 

 

In theory one indian shooter could bring more medals home than the entire hockey fraternity for India.  No matter how much you spend on that single person it will be less than the annual budget of hockey

 

 

Posted

This is why i keep saying fudge dhyanchand and hockey. It has been a curse on india based on its gazzumping of limited resources. India probably would have been better off if we sucked at hockey as it would force us to focus on more medal getting individual sports. 

 

Focus on wrsetling,weight lifting, boxing , shooting and archery. Sports like hockey badminton etc let the private sector do the heavy lifting.

 

I suspect most people in sports admin in india know this. But don't want to upset the hockey is the national sport myth. 

 

 

In an ideal world olympics needs to reflect or give more weightage to team events and events that need more infra. Personally would give both hockey and football 11 medals each in the table  based on total players on the pitch. Cause atm you have central asian nations like Georgia focussing in niche individual sports and punching well above their weight. 

Posted

After the diving, failure to use the VAR, cheating by English fans, and I'm hearing reports of Danish fans assaulted and spat on, I say mama mia GO ITALY! It ain't coming home England cause you can't cheat against the serial cheaters. Italy to win 3-0 to humiliate England and its "offensive capabilities" in their own home and put their fingers up :finger: to screw England and its famous hooligans to piss their way in their pubs. A side note to Indians: Don't go anywhere near their vicinity as you'll be attacked to vent out their frustration as anyone resembling a "p@ki" is waiting to be smashed and told to go back to their country even if they were born there.

×
×
  • Create New...