Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, ash said:


Blasphemy triggers all theists, it is not particular only to Muslims. None of the Ruling party spokesperson in Muslim countries have commented on Hindu gods have they? 

 

 

their books comment on it. they break temples. don't they. saying that marrying a 6 year old is wrong is blasphemy?? will you marry a 6 year old to be pious?

Posted
1 minute ago, HamHindustani said:

 

their books comment on it. they break temples. don't they. saying that marrying a 6 year old is wrong is blasphemy?? will you marry a 6 year old to be pious?


Ok let’s take it like this.  If the spokesperson of Saudi Arabia says something like Ram thought Sita had extra marital sex with Ravan so he made her walk through fire. How will Hindus react? Isn’t it blasphemy, or will you take it as fact?

 

maligning the opposite religion’s god will trigger ppl even if it is fact. Especially if it comes from Ruling party spokesperson. Think logically

Posted
11 minutes ago, ash said:


Ok let’s take it like this.  If the spokesperson of Saudi Arabia says something like Ram thought Sita had extra marital sex with Ravan so he made her walk through fire. How will Hindus react? Isn’t it blasphemy, or will you take it as fact?

 

maligning the opposite religion’s god will trigger ppl even if it is fact. Especially if it comes from Ruling party spokesperson. Think logically

fact. That is what Ram thought.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, HamHindustani said:

fact. That is what Ram thought.


Great. You accepted it. Not all Hindus will accept it, they will be triggered. 
 

Similarly, some muslims will accept that the marriage is wrong.Not all Muslims will accept it though, some will be triggered.

Edited by ash
Posted
5 minutes ago, ash said:


Great. You accepted it. Not all Hindus will accept it, they will be triggered. 
 

Similarly, some muslims will accept that the marriage is wrong.Not all Muslims will accept it though, some will be triggered.

not marriage. marriage at 6 years. only some will accept??

what is your view. anyone who does not accept that marriage at 6 is wrong is a criminal in mind

Posted
6 minutes ago, First class said:

All I know, you got to be a sick person to make fun of any religion , across the board, whether its hindu insulting islam or a Muslim doing the same against hindu. 

Religion by definition is a funny concept

Posted
4 minutes ago, HamHindustani said:

not marriage. marriage at 6 years. only some will accept??

what is your view. anyone who does not accept that marriage at 6 is wrong is a criminal in mind

Ok let me spell it out for you, I am basically spoon feeding here.

 

What Nupur said is a fact, and obviously marrying a 6 yr old is wrong. But since she is not an atheist, and also being a BJP spokesperson, she should not have said that. she is taunting the religion, this is definitely not a smart move. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, ash said:

Ok let me spell it out for you, I am basically spoon feeding here.

 

What Nupur said is a fact, and obviously marrying a 6 yr old is wrong. But since she is not an atheist, and also being a BJP spokesperson, she should not have said that. she is taunting the religion, this is definitely not a smart move. 

 

Marrying a 6 year old is wrong. Why cannot she say that? Because there are a bunch of people who will get offended with the fact that marrying a 6 year old is wrong? Or just because its religion, the wrong should be brushed under the carpet

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, First class said:

All I know, you got to be a sick person to make fun of any religion , across the board, whether its hindu insulting islam or a Muslim doing the same against hindu. 

why does the book say  kaafir then? is that a praise?

Posted

TIL, only atheists have the moral right to abuse other religions. No others can criticize or do purvapaksha of others, because the sole intent of theists doing that is to create riots and spread hatred.

 

 

Posted

My view, way to go is UCC and stricter rules for blasphemy threats. A special law for threatening for blasphemy be brought in.

 

Secondly, such comments are uncalled for. Even if she is provoked, there is no reason to bring it up in a TV debate. She was wrong not sure legacy but she crossed the line. 

 

When will the TanseJuda crap will end? There is a legal system in india and use it or else explain how is India different from Sudan, Afg or Somalia or pak. 

 

Posted

Looks like BJP does not need Muslim votes, they are good enough with majority of Hindu votes only  , otherwise how can they hurt Muslims in India with statements like this . 

Posted
7 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Were such practices common in Pre Islamic world? ...  Struggling to find something on that.  Not a lot of written records of cultural practices in Arabian peninsula.  I am assuming things were same probably even before Islam & such kind of mindset & practices normal? 

Some accounts dispute this fact and TheGuardian has this written:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2012/sep/17/muhammad-aisha-truth
 

They point out that, in seventh-century Arabia, adulthood was defined as the onset of puberty. (This much is true, and was also the case in Europe: five centuries after Muhammad's marriage to Aisha, 33-year-old King John of England married 12-year-old Isabella of Angoulême.) Interestingly, of the many criticisms of Muhammad made at the time by his opponents, none focused on Aisha's age at marriage.

According to this perspective, Aisha may have been young, but she was not younger than was the norm at the time. Other Muslims doubt the very idea that Aisha was six at the time of marriage, referring to historians who have questioned the reliability of Aisha's age as given in the saying. In a society without a birth registry and where people did not celebrate birthdays, most people estimated their own age and that of others. Aisha would have been no different. What's more, Aisha had already been engaged to someone else before she married Muhammad, suggesting she had already been mature enough by the standards of her society to consider marriage for a while. It seems difficult to reconcile this with her being six.“

Posted
9 hours ago, R!TTER said:

Well did they stop selling crude oil to France? No, then you know where the *ing hypocrites stand on this :om:

So is natural gas, EV's & basically anything else these days! Till we get fusion working it's all smoke & mirrors any way :hitler:

 

 

no .ethanol is much much worse. you are basically using up arable land to grow sugarcane and corn just to produce fuel.with the coming food crisis its even more irresponsible.

Posted
1 hour ago, First class said:

Looks like BJP does not need Muslim votes, they are good enough with majority of Hindu votes only  , otherwise how can they hurt Muslims in India with statements like this . 

BJP don't even need to pander to any specific sections right now! There's basically zero opposition at the center, the only way they lose the next elections is through foot in the mouth statements like these but then we've also seen BRat & his many KO meltdowns :laugh:

×
×
  • Create New...