Will Bangladesh ever be good at cricket?

[badmash]

7 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

Your missed the inverted commas in 'than'.   If inverted commas are used, there is no need to capitalise the letter.  But I get your point.  

This is a stable rule in our written language: Whenever you begin a sentence capitalize the first letter of the first word. This includes capitalizing the first word or a direct quotation when it's a full sentence, even if it appears within another sentence.
 

But I get your point.

[Frustrated]

12 minutes ago, badmash said:

This is a stable rule in our written language: Whenever you begin a sentence capitalize the first letter of the first word. This includes capitalizing the first word or a direct quotation when it's a full sentence, even if it appears within another sentence.
 

But I get your point.

This rule does not apply here.    I had not written the sentence in English..  Phir se read karle.  -   'than' hota hai.  Kya ye English hai?  ye to urdu hai....LOL.   But I get your point.  

Edited September 9 by Frustrated

[badmash]

13 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

This rule does not apply here.    I had not written the sentence in English..  Phir se read karle.  -   'than' hota hai.  Kya ye English hai?  ye to urdu hai....LOL.   But I get your point.  

Acha I thought the rule was to not capitalize the letter in quotes as per you 

 

ab to poori bhasha hi baldal di 

 

But I get your point.

[Frustrated]

Just now, badmash said:

Acha I thought the rule was to not capitalize the letter in quotes as per you 

 

ab to poori bhasha hi baldal di 

 

But I get your point.

Kripaya thik se padha kareein.  Urdu/Hindi ke rules English se alag hote hai.     Happy that U got my point.   

[badmash]

5 minutes ago, Frustrated said:

Kripaya thik se padha kareein.  Urdu/Hindi ke rules English se alag hote hai.     Happy that U got my point.   

‘U’ nahi, ‘you’ hota hay, aur aapnay likha to English letters mein hay na  aur rules lagao Hindi hay 

 

But I get your point.

 

[sage]

On 9/6/2023 at 5:10 PM, vvvslaxman said:

 

This thread was started in 2022 lol

This is the context for the threads creation

[Frustrated]

On 9/9/2023 at 7:40 PM, badmash said:

‘U’ nahi, ‘you’ hota hay, aur aapnay likha to English letters mein hay na  aur rules lagao Hindi hay 

 

But I get your point.

 

Yes.   It's 'You' who got slaughter*****d today.   But I get your point.   

[the don]

Their 3rd win in the last 4 ODI’s vs India. 

[Number]

5 minutes ago, the don said:

Their 3rd win in the last 4 ODI’s vs India. 

Yeah they have finished higher than Pakistan in super four.

[cricketfan28]

never underestimate tigers, today they are better than ipl superstars.

[Gollum]

What did I tell you folks? They may be toygers against others but know how to beat us. We can't play their spinners, we can't bowl to their lower order. 

[Sean Bradley]

They were good today. Credit to them. I thought shami was going to do another Dinesh Kartik on them today when he hit that four. Lucky escape for them, tough luck India. 

[deathmonger]

bangladesh will be better by pakistan by the 2030s. their economy is already better and everything flows from there.

[Nikhil_cric]

12 hours ago, Gollum said:

What did I tell you folks? They may be toygers against others but know how to beat us. We can't play their spinners, we can't bowl to their lower order. 

It's not just BD lower order.  All lower orders.  It's because they don't make plans based on simple data.

 

Only Bumrah and Siraj have any success bowling short .

 

But they all bowl short with pace on and they end up disappearing everywhere.

 

Need good/hard lengths with variations or Yorkers. 

 

 

 

[Nikhil_cric]

Their current pace attack is their best ever - Taskin, Ebadot are very accurate and Shoriful and Mahmud are pretty good too.

 

Just need batsmen. 

[the don]

Btw people who say that they only rested the two main bowlers must realize that without the two main bowlers even India lost to Westindies. 
Would india compete as well without Bumrah and Kuldeep as srl and bang have done ?

[singhvivek141]

52 minutes ago, the don said:

Btw people who say that they only rested the two main bowlers must realize that without the two main bowlers even India lost to Westindies. 
Would india compete as well without Bumrah and Kuldeep as srl and bang have done ?

Well, India had the privilege of thrashing the best cricketing team in history, in their own den without presence of Bumrah, Shami, Ishant, Umesh, Kohli, Rohit etc.

 

While that cricketing team was literally playing with their best XI. Still got outplayed by us.

 

Before that win, people were used to apply Asterix on 2018 victory, now those people are too ashamed to talk about their lack of knowledge.

Edited September 16 by singhvivek141

[FairCricket]

This win will be enough for bangalis to be over confident and stay happy losing for another 1 year. 

[Frustrated]

On 9/9/2023 at 6:50 PM, badmash said:

I mean bangladesh currently has a better pace attack then India 

[sage]

Bump. Losing to the Dutch