Jump to content

No ball-gate....the Pakistani Argument (Comedy Thread)


Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, adi B said:

Actually these deluded fools are not much different than Bangladeshs when it comes to handling defeat .

Whine and cry you lot :argh:

 

Even former cricketers play this angle in a subtle way.

Posted

Taunting from you guys makes no difference to the fact that it was not a clean win. Kohli's foot wasn't behind the line, so can't be a no ball :)

 

Just that statement is good enough, and law is crystal clear about it that it must be behind the line. Pakistan was robbed from a potential victory, and such bonker errors shouldn't be made at a very crucial stage. Follow rules and win cleanly, koi tension nahi us mein 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, ImranKhanGreatest said:

Taunting from you guys makes no difference to the fact that it was not a clean win. Kohli's foot wasn't behind the line, so can't be a no ball :)

 

Just that statement is good enough, and law is crystal clear about it that it must be behind the line. Pakistan was robbed from a potential victory, and such bonker errors shouldn't be made at a very crucial stage. Follow rules and win cleanly, koi tension nahi us mein 

 

 

Please show the law 

Posted
1 minute ago, ImranKhanGreatest said:

Taunting from you guys makes no difference to the fact that it was not a clean win. Kohli's foot wasn't behind the line, so can't be a no ball :)

 

Just that statement is good enough, and law is crystal clear about it that it must be behind the line. Pakistan was robbed from a potential victory, and such bonker errors shouldn't be made at a very crucial stage. Follow rules and win cleanly, koi tension nahi us mein 

 

 

 

 

Posted

In saare Pakistani ko dard hua. I love the fact that it seems the no ball was given after Kohli demanded it. Salt over wounds,

 

First the six.

Then the no ball.

Then the bowled 3.

Then the Ashwin wide.

 

Man, the amount of pain Pakistani have gone through - inject it in my veins. Fecking failed state.

Posted
1 hour ago, ImranKhanGreatest said:

Taunting from you guys makes no difference to the fact that it was not a clean win. Kohli's foot wasn't behind the line, so can't be a no ball :)

 

Just that statement is good enough, and law is crystal clear about it that it must be behind the line. Pakistan was robbed from a potential victory, and such bonker errors shouldn't be made at a very crucial stage. Follow rules and win cleanly, koi tension nahi us mein 

 

 

This win is getting more sweeter by such bitterness. Burn, Burn.... Burnol 

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Ff59J0xXkAIpwVP?format=jpg&name=900x900

 

lol

Good share, foot not behind the line which is considered batsman area. On the line wicket keeper stumping is also stump out. If you are out of your batting area then it can't be called a no ball, that too on a spinner 

 

Edited by ImranKhanGreatest
Posted
4 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

This win is getting more sweeter by such bitterness. Burn, Burn.... Burnol 

Just stating facts and law. Sure if this way you wanted to win tu essi bol dete, match essi dey dete diwali gift samjh kar :) 

Posted

Reminds me of the Netflix Flat Earthers Documentary... where they do all these experiments to discredit the globe only to end up proving it is indeed round.

 

This whole fiasco is just like that. Every Image they shared (Ignoring the made up dynamics in their head) proves that it is INDEED a no ball.

 

Batsmen foot touching the crease.

Ball above waist height during contact.

Batsman upright while playing the ball.

 

This just might be the Javed Miandad moment for them. Will take decades to recover...

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, ImranKhanGreatest said:

Just stating facts and law. Sure if this way you wanted to win tu essi bol dete, match essi dey dete diwali gift samjh kar :) 

 

What law, this is not a stumping or a bowler's no-ball for the foot should be behind the line? The above-waist is not for referral, it is left to on-field real-time interpretation. That is the law. So, fight to get it changed. Don't cry over some imaginary law that the foot has to be behind the line to be considered above the waist. So, if the foot is not behind and the bowler hits a person's head, does it mean it was not a beamer? 

Posted
11 minutes ago, ImranKhanGreatest said:

Good share, foot not behind the line which is considered batsman area. On the line wicket keeper stumping is also stump out. If you are out of your batting area then it can't be called a no ball, that too on a spinner 

 

 

That sharing was not for analyzing lol  That was just for laughs hahaha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...