Jump to content

'How long can you ignore Prithvi Shaw, Shubman Gill's legitimate claims?': Ex-India manager Sunil Subramaniam


sage

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/how-long-can-you-ignore-prithvi-shaw-shubman-gill-s-legitimate-claims-ex-india-manager-to-rohit-and-dravid-ahead-of-3rd-test-vs-australia-101677136030891.html

 

Former Tamil Nadu player Sunil Subramaniam, who was India’s manager and a part of Ravi Shastri’s think-tank in the 2018 series, said, five years ago it was a different situation. Rahul was a youngster and needed backing. "You should realize that Rahul, at that stage, was a youngster...but now it’s significantly different," he told The Times of India.

It's not like India did not have options at that time but they were perhaps not of the quality of Shubman Gill, Mayank Agarwal and Prithvi Shaw. Murali Vijay had just been replaced by Rahul himself and Shikhar Dhawan's Test career was also witnessing a downward curve. There were no immediate replacements in the domestic circuit. Gill and Shaw were too young and Agarwal hadn't quite set the Ranji Trophy alight.

"There are players like Shubhman who are just not knocking, but banging on the door. And then there’s Prithvi Shaw as well. How long can you ignore legitimate claims?” he asked.

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Sandeep99 said:

If Rahul is serious about his career, he should go on and country cricket in England. If public anger increases, he might as well be removed from IPL captaincy. He needs to focus on his batting.

 

He is lucky to be born in this era. Guy like him would have lost his place long back in the 80s 

Posted
Just now, figo6762 said:

What is the policy on making whole sale squad changes middle of the series ? 

 

Australia will do for sure :)  Seriously it is not whole sale change for India. Just one change.

Posted
3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

He is lucky to be born in this era. Guy like him would have lost his place long back in the 80s 

This entire generation of Indian cricketers are lucky. They all have a good backup in the form of IPL. Rahul can't bat in this era. Imagine him facing the heat and skill of the 80's and 90's..

Posted
2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

He is lucky to be born in this era. Guy like him would have lost his place long back in the 80s 

Exactly. Not a chance he would have survived so long in any other era since at least 40 years. Vinod Kambli just had one bad series and he was out. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Sandeep99 said:

This entire generation of Indian cricketers are lucky. They all have a good backup in the form of IPL. Rahul can't bat in this era. Imagine him facing the heat and skill of the 80's and 90's..

Lol bowling is much much better and way harder to face now. Players are much superior. 

 

Past eras are a joke pre 2010. So many no ball wickets. Unlimited bouncer rule. No drs. No 3rd umpire. 

 

Every team has quality fast bowlers barring a couple.

Edited by speedracer
Posted

Bowlers are unlucky breed in this era.  Horses for courses apply only to bowlers. Not batsmen.  Umesh Yadav is one of the best bowler  in Indian conditions.H He had to sit out. Rahane most of the time sucked in India. Yet he never had to face horses for courses policy.  It is applicable only for bowlers.

Posted
14 hours ago, Texan said:

Exactly. Not a chance he would have survived so long in any other era since at least 40 years. Vinod Kambli just had one bad series and he was out. 

kambli was far better than kela. on current form, most of our batters at home would not stack up against kambli vs spin

Posted

Not expecting much with these selector goons .. bunch of useless farts … Srikanth was probably the best chief in the recent past .. but mama was in charge ..  in way somebody like mama will whip ppl in place , but there are consequences to that .. 

Posted
On 2/24/2023 at 5:09 AM, vvvslaxman said:

Bowlers are unlucky breed in this era.  Horses for courses apply only to bowlers. Not batsmen.  Umesh Yadav is one of the best bowler  in Indian conditions.H He had to sit out. Rahane most of the time sucked in India. Yet he never had to face horses for courses policy.  It is applicable only for bowlers.

In Asia umesh is deadly. Shits on Cummins shaheen and rabada etc. 

 

Flat wickets of Asia he is the man.

Posted
12 hours ago, speedracer said:

In Asia umesh is deadly. Shits on Cummins shaheen and rabada etc. 

 

Flat wickets of Asia he is the man.

tracks are not as flat as westerners think. plenty of scope to use reverse swing and even conventional swing + short balls effectively. andie has done well in SC past few years, for example, having learnt from his previous experiences

Posted
4 hours ago, Vijy said:

tracks are not as flat as westerners think. plenty of scope to use reverse swing and even conventional swing + short balls effectively. andie has done well in SC past few years, for example, having learnt from his previous experiences

Exactly. You need skill plus either pace or bounce to be effective in India. 

 

Short ball works. It's just hard to hit the surface because it's taxing on the body. Westerners just don't want to work hard. 

 

Mcgrath once said his favourite place to bowl was actually india. India wickets are perfect of you have one of either reverse swing plus pace ability or bounce plus unerring accuracy. 

 

Sometimes those rough patches can help quicks too as ball movement is unpredictable. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, DeepSpace said:

Gill and Shaw not playing is proof of Indian nepotism. Has been there since age immemorial and always will be. While players like Fatit, Chokohli, Gujji and Kela rule the roost. 

gill not playing is the bigger travesty. in tests, sarfaraz has a much stronger case than shaw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...