Jump to content

Remembering Sehwag at Chennai


Recommended Posts

No not that one, this one …

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-tour-of-india-2004-05-61430/india-vs-australia-2nd-test-64100/full-scorecard
 

Needing 228 to win in a 4th innings chase against arguably the best test XI to ever play test cricket, Sehwag cracked 3 fours off McGrath, having just smacked a peerless 155, in what ended up being the final action in the test, as the rain descended on day 5. A chance to draw level 1-1 gone. Aus took the series 2-1.

 

Probably the most gutted I have ever been watching test cricket. India pulling out due to covid comes a close second.

Link to comment

This game, and the 2002 CT finals (both) against Lankans. We weren't favorites in either of those games but thanks to rain Gods, more opportunities for us to delude ourselves. India's chasing ability (in both formats) and ability to choke was well known to all in that period. 

 

In the 2004 series, we just had Sehwag in rhythm, and his 4th innings record was a joke, all other stalwarts were either out of form or hampered by injuries (Yuvi as opener, Kaif in place of Sachin :hysterical:). I mean we all know how our famed batting lineup (full strength, by then even Gambo was opening) fared against Pak in Chinnaswamy a year later on that day 5 pitch which was way flatter than this Chennai one. And if people here believe that joke attack of Sami, Razzaq, Kaneria, Afridi was more formidable than McWarne, Gillespie, Kasper.........not even getting into other comparisons like fielding, fitness, mental strength, ability to intimidate both opponents as well as umpires (Aussie gamesmanship at its peak). Aussies would have made that 220 look like 300-350 on day 5. In a different format earlier that year even Bracken, Bichel, Brad Williams, Harvey, Symonds, Clarke made 230 look like 300 in the tri series final at Eden Gardens!!!!!

 

PS: In that Chinnaswamy game also we ended day 4 confidently with Viru hitting 3 boundaries off Sami/Razzaq, next day we saw how we batted, I mean even Tendu was getting bullied by trash Sami, that minnow Pak bowling lineup toyed with us for most of the day. Imagine what McGrath would have done to those mental midgets. Even Warne was bowling well in that series. Gillespie and Kasper too at the peak of their powers. 

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment

We must consider ourselves lucky that we didn't lose the 2004 BGT series 0-4. Never seen India play that poorly at home, granted the opponents were pretty good. Even in 2012 against Eng, we crushed them in 1st test and took 1st innings lead in Nagpur.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

We must consider ourselves lucky that we didn't lose the 2004 BGT series 0-4. Never seen India play that poorly at home, granted the opponents were pretty good. Even in 2012 against Eng, we crushed them in 1st test and took 1st innings lead in Nagpur.

The team was marred by injuries,rift and politics. Ganguly backing out of Nagpur Test symbolised everything. Imagine it happening in this age.

Link to comment
On 7/8/2023 at 11:55 AM, goose said:

No not that one, this one …

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/australia-tour-of-india-2004-05-61430/india-vs-australia-2nd-test-64100/full-scorecard
 

Needing 228 to win in a 4th innings chase against arguably the best test XI to ever play test cricket, Sehwag cracked 3 fours off McGrath, having just smacked a peerless 155, in what ended up being the final action in the test, as the rain descended on day 5. A chance to draw level 1-1 gone. Aus took the series 2-1.

 

Probably the most gutted I have ever been watching test cricket. India pulling out due to covid comes a close second.

I still remember those shots he played and how he walked off after stumps.  

Link to comment
On 7/8/2023 at 11:30 PM, Gollum said:

This game, and the 2002 CT finals (both) against Lankans. We weren't favorites in either of those games but thanks to rain Gods, more opportunities for us to delude ourselves. India's chasing ability (in both formats) and ability to choke was well known to all in that period. 

 

In the 2004 series, we just had Sehwag in rhythm, and his 4th innings record was a joke, all other stalwarts were either out of form or hampered by injuries (Yuvi as opener, Kaif in place of Sachin :hysterical:). I mean we all know how our famed batting lineup (full strength, by then even Gambo was opening) fared against Pak in Chinnaswamy a year later on that day 5 pitch which was way flatter than this Chennai one. And if people here believe that joke attack of Sami, Razzaq, Kaneria, Afridi was more formidable than McWarne, Gillespie, Kasper.........not even getting into other comparisons like fielding, fitness, mental strength, ability to intimidate both opponents as well as umpires (Aussie gamesmanship at its peak). Aussies would have made that 220 look like 300-350 on day 5. In a different format earlier that year even Bracken, Bichel, Brad Williams, Harvey, Symonds, Clarke made 230 look like 300 in the tri series final at Eden Gardens!!!!!

 

PS: In that Chinnaswamy game also we ended day 4 confidently with Viru hitting 3 boundaries off Sami/Razzaq, next day we saw how we batted, I mean even Tendu was getting bullied by trash Sami, that minnow Pak bowling lineup toyed with us for most of the day. Imagine what McGrath would have done to those mental midgets. Even Warne was bowling well in that series. Gillespie and Kasper too at the peak of their powers. 

 

Actually Tendu was bullied by Afridi. He was given a repreive during that painful 19 run knock. Ball was turning. Chase was in control until Gauti ran Sehwag out. Also India just had to survive 6 more overs. Match would have ended in draw. Balaji couldn't do on that track. But against Australia we had a shot given that India batted deep. Target was gettable given that Warnie hardly showed up against us.

Link to comment

Indian team with their best batting talent in their history  got bullied by a so so fast bowling attack, Mcgrath while great was not running thru any batting side in India.

 

Dravid in that series showed , why he was always a supporting act rather than main batsman.

Edited by putrevus
Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Lord said:

Yes for that era they didn't 

 

But Aus were more rounded team covering all bases.

I don't think so, in any era those fearsome foursome would be enough to bruise and batter any team.

 

They would smash any Australian team into submission.

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, putrevus said:

I don't think so, in any era those fearsome foursome would be enough to bruise and batter any team.

 

They would smash any Australian team into submission.

Only if there are no helmets and seam friendly pitches.

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, Lord said:

Only if there are no helmets and seam friendly pitches.

Are you kidding, One Mark Wood won a test with all helmets and protection.

 

Those four bowlers are 1000 times better bowlers than Wood. Great fast bowlers will always be handful.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...