Jump to content

KL Rahul suffers a fresh niggle and won't be available for the first 2 games of Asia Cup confirmed by Dravid


Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, tweaker said:

They may still play him against Nepal on seniority quota

How big is this quota? Have Rohit and Kohli not filled the quota already?

Posted (edited)

BCCI thought of KL is next big thing and placed all their eggs in 1 basket.

Earlier BCCI use to back only proven performer but this time they wanted to get some sellable faces before Rohit and Kolhi are phased out of Intnl cricket.

 

Pant and KL were their two picks to stardom (who will bring sponsors and eyeballs for years to come)and it failed, now they are backing Gill and he is getting to play all formats even if he is not fit for T20s or tests.

 

Last two managements have left with no other option to pick KL even if he is injured. He is undropable in ODIs now. 

 

Do not think Kishan and Samson are intnl material, be it temperament or technique. Samson has just 1 century in FC cricket.

 

If kishan would have been playing for any other team tham MI he would have not been in the team. 

 

 

Edited by tapandrun
Posted
52 minutes ago, tapandrun said:

BCCI thought of KL is next big thing and placed all their eggs in 1 basket.

Earlier BCCI use to back only proven performer but this time they wanted to get some sellable faces before Rohit and Kolhi are phased out of Intnl cricket.

 

Pant and KL were their two picks to stardom (who will bring sponsors and eyeballs for years to come)and it failed, now they are backing Gill and he is getting to play all formats even if he is not fit for T20s or tests.

 

Last two managements have left with no other option to pick KL even if he is injured. He is undropable in ODIs now. 

 

Do not think Kishan and Samson are intnl material, be it temperament or technique. Samson has just 1 century in FC cricket.

 

If kishan would have been playing for any other team tham MI he would have not been in the team. 

 

 

 

Comes down to number of sponsors you have. KL Rahul due to IPL has accumulated quiet a number of sponsors. That is why selectors are keeping him relevant. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Comes down to number of sponsors you have. KL Rahul due to IPL has accumulated quiet a number of sponsors. That is why selectors are keeping him relevant. 

Why has he got so many sponsors? What has he done in the IPL? Has he been in the winning team or helped the winning team with match winning performances? I am sorry I don't follow the  IPL much.

 

The peerless KL in international cricket so far has had a eminently forgettable career.

Posted
12 hours ago, tapandrun said:

Pant and KL were their two picks to stardom (who will bring sponsors and eyeballs for years to come)and it failed,

Pant and the peerless KL should never be compared or even spoken of in the same vein.

 

Pant before his injury was at least in test cricket a person who could turn a match and has given pleasure even to our opponents with his batting exploits.

 

The peerless KL is a nobody.

Posted
14 hours ago, AKane said:

Why has he got so many sponsors? What has he done in the IPL? Has he been in the winning team or helped the winning team with match winning performances? I am sorry I don't follow the  IPL much.

 

The peerless KL in international cricket so far has had a eminently forgettable career.

The 1 orange cap he won and being in the conversation for it every other year ie a pointless award for the highest runscorer in the IPL.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, rollingstoned said:

The 1 orange cap he won and being in the conversation for it every other year ie a pointless award for the highest runscorer in the IPL.

yeah ..... in  limited overs cricket total runs mean nothing. It always has to be in relation to the overs consumed for same. Even then it is a partial picture because the asking rate also matters. The RR can on its own be good but still lesser than the ask rate. Then it is irrelevant that it is good.

 

Basically all that matters in LOI is who won the game? Did one help win the game?

 

Gavaskar's 36 n.o. looks good in vacuum.  When you say in 60 overs..... it is like "Yikes"!!!!! Will contend for the worst ODI innings ever!

Edited by AKane
Posted
5 hours ago, tweaker said:

Rahul Dravid confirms KL Rahul won't be available for the first 2 games of Asia Cup 2023.

So, will they tweak the batting order to have Kishan open? Or will Kishan bat at 5?

Posted
2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Never seen something like this. If someone is injured when the tournament starts he has no place in that tournament. 

Speaks about our team. Coach captain selectors think an injured, out of form, make-shift keeper who is primarily an opener now turned into a middle order batsman is the key to our potential success. Without Rahul we may not win WC but I don't know how a 10man team + Rahul will win you WC.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...