Jump to content

Lara's record in Danger : SA vs Zim


Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, Gollum said:

Agar Indian ke paas record hota toh wouldn't have declared. 

Even Lara's chasing record of 400 was quite petty and selfish in my view. 

They batted even after lunch on day 3 just for an individual record book entry.

Posted
2 hours ago, Number said:

Even Lara's chasing record of 400 was quite petty and selfish in my view. 

They batted even after lunch on day 3 just for an individual record book entry.

Lara just wanted to take the record back from Hayden.

Posted
23 hours ago, bowl_out said:

And we still talk about Dravid's declaration call after two decades :facepalm:

Can you help me understand why this declaration made sense? They won with 2 days to spare. Was worshipping Lara so important? Wouldn't it be better for a player from south africa to make history and the country's name be associated with the record over west indies? 

 

This was nothing but plain virtue signaling and attention seeking behavior. Oh look I don't care about the record is you caring about the record,. particularly since the player said he specifically declared for Lara

 

Weird weird behaviour and weird to see people here praising this. Next what, south africa will forfeit the series in a country which Lara never won in? 

Posted
24 minutes ago, New guy said:

Can you help me understand why this declaration made sense? They won with 2 days to spare. Was worshipping Lara so important? Wouldn't it be better for a player from south africa to make history and the country's name be associated with the record over west indies? 

 

This was nothing but plain virtue signaling and attention seeking behavior. Oh look I don't care about the record is you caring about the record,. particularly since the player said he specifically declared for Lara

 

Weird weird behaviour and weird to see people here praising this. Next what, south africa will forfeit the series in a country which Lara never won in? 

 

Not like he declared at 399.  367 is odd number to declare at. It is almost like he is trying to invent an excuse

Posted
7 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Not like he declared at 399.  367 is odd number to declare at. It is almost like he is trying to invent an excuse

Exactly. Why didn't he declare before he reached 300? Why didn't he declare when team score was 550? 

Posted
7 hours ago, New guy said:

This was nothing but plain virtue signaling and attention seeking behavior. Oh look I don't care about the record is you caring about the record,. particularly since the player said he specifically declared for Lara

First time seen you use that term :fear1:

Posted
8 hours ago, New guy said:

Can you help me understand why this declaration made sense? They won with 2 days to spare. Was worshipping Lara so important? Wouldn't it be better for a player from south africa to make history and the country's name be associated with the record over west indies? 

 

This was nothing but plain virtue signaling and attention seeking behavior. Oh look I don't care about the record is you caring about the record,. particularly since the player said he specifically declared for Lara

 

Weird weird behaviour and weird to see people here praising this. Next what, south africa will forfeit the series in a country which Lara never won in? 

 

Agree, the reasoning and Lara worship was stupid. The declaration didn't make sense given that rate at which they were scoring. The only thing is they got 600+, and they were probably unsure how Zim would score, so wanted to give themselves adequate time to get 20 wickets. That said, the post-match talk about leaving Lara's record unbroken was plain stupid.

 

But my point in general is that individual scores shouldn't matter as much. It's good to have milestone scores, but taking it to the level of blame game was unnecessary in the Sachin-Dravid case. 

Posted
9 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Not like he declared at 399.  367 is odd number to declare at. It is almost like he is trying to invent an excuse

He would have continued to bat if there was no break. There was a lunch break when he was 367 and didn't come back to bat again.

Posted
9 hours ago, rkt.india said:

He would have continued to bat if there was no break. There was a lunch break when he was 367 and didn't come back to bat again.

 

Yeah was talked into it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...