Jump to content

Is it right to declare so that a record by a prior player is preserved?


sage

Do you support declaring so that a record by a prior player is preserved?   

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you support declaring so that a record by a prior player is preserved?

    • Yes -- Lara is a legend of the game
    • Yes -- only if they are a fellow countrymen (e.g. Mark Taylor declaring to preserve Bradman's record)
    • No -- Records are made to be broken


Recommended Posts

Posted

That is like saying Root will retire so that Tendulkar’s record is preserved lol.

 

Also both 375 and 400 were in draws in a very small ground, pointless innings both. Very selfish innings especially the 400*.

 

Mulder should have gone for it or just declared when he got 300* which probably makes more sense rather than getting close and then declaring.

 

There are no wtc points on stake, Zimbabwe can hardly bat. It was a no brainier to break the record.

Posted

Beating laras record against piss poor zimbs is a disgrace. Thats utter disgraceful. Some records r not meant to be broken unless the opposition is in tier group. 

Posted

Mark Taylor, Michael Clarke, both refused to go past Bradman. Hayden OTOH had no qualms about it. Depends on individual. As long as team wins, should be good enough. Lara's 400 was selfish. 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Chaos said:

Beating laras record against piss poor zimbs is a disgrace. Thats utter disgraceful. Some records r not meant to be broken unless the opposition is in tier group. 


England in the 90’s was par with Zimbabwe that decade when Lara scored 375.

 

The 400 one, WI had already lost series 3 nil, so final match was just a statpad operation.

 

 

Edited by Prabhdeep Singh
Posted

It's not like he declared on 399! He still had 30+ runs to score and probably didn't want the pressure and drama of batting for the record. If he continued batting and got out for 380 or 390, people would call him a choker who selfishly went for the record. So what he has done is perfectly fine.

Posted
On 7/8/2025 at 4:31 PM, Gollum said:

Mark Taylor, Michael Clarke, both refused to go past Bradman. Hayden OTOH had no qualms about it. Depends on individual. As long as team wins, should be good enough. Lara's 400 was selfish. 

Yep .. Mark Taylor remained not out on Bradmans' 334 against Pak. That was quite a flat pitch

Posted
On 7/8/2025 at 2:39 PM, Chaos said:

Beating laras record against piss poor zimbs is a disgrace. Thats utter disgraceful. Some records r not meant to be broken unless the opposition is in tier group. 

If it was so easy to score 400 against minnows, why didn't anyone else do it so far? Mulder will regret this his entire life, no one will remember him in history

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...