How much abuse would Siraj and Akash Deep have copped if we had narrowly lost Oval?

[Suhaan]

9 minutes ago, Serpico said:

I am not aware of this word, but seeing no proofs in the reply it is obvious that you pulled that allegation out of your ass

No I'm putting that up your arse

[Suhaan]

4 hours ago, New guy said:

Example do kaise appease karte hai? Numbers la kar baat karo

 

Hindus are growing richer everyday, have more and more representation in every field, from police to IAS to any government job or private job Hindus are more and the top leadership are mostly Hindus, we live longer, are more healthy, more educated while all other religions are going opposite.

 

To kaisa appeasement dhakkan? Marriage laws? Talak? Isko appeasement bolte hai?

 

In all the real things that matter Hindus are growing more and doing better. 

 

Ek google search se pata chal jata hai kitna real appeasement hai, jo tere jaise padhe likhe propaganda swallowing moorkh kar nahi sakta.

 

Tujhe pata hai minority appeasement kisko bolte hai?

 

65 to 70% Indians are non vegetarians. Phir bhi unko Ghar nahi milta, kai jagah sirf veg serve karte hai, har occasion par non veg band, bahut jagah non veg le jana band

 

Isko bolte hai minority appeasement when a small % of veg hold everyone hostage and discriminate in job, house and everywhere against the majority non veg.

 

Tujhe agar minority appeasement se problem hoti to pahle iske khilaf awaz uthata

 

Teri samajh ke bahar hai

 

 

Tere se bada dogla kahi nahi hai,abe dhakkan if Hindus are more progressive creative and laborious toh richer toh honge hi

Muslims ko kon padhne rok raha hai,unhi platforms pe unko bhi aaneki permission hai

Representation of Muslims is also increasing in every field

Number of Muslim representation in public services is actually increasing

Tere jaise deliberate fool aisi hi apna propaganda chalate hai majority population ke against

Chal tujhe ek simple sa appeasement wala khela batatu hu 

Rohit vemula bill is clear cut example of appeasement politics by your laadla party which is going to be presented in Karanataka assembly soon

Tere jaise shatir log ispe apna muh jarur sil lenge

 

Edited August 8, 2025 by Suhaan

[Suhaan]

37 minutes ago, Lord said:

Bumrah is a Sikh. Ab khalistani mat bolna

Arey nhi yaar

[Serpico]

53 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

No I'm putting that up your arse

atleast we both agree that you are not interested in using the brain

[Forever Indian]

Not as much abuse as Gambhir would have got and his CV would have looked damn bad with 3 straight Test series losses!

 

Just look at the celebrations and how Gambhir looked like a man who just got news that he saved his million dollar job!

 

 

[Suhaan]

29 minutes ago, Serpico said:

atleast we both agree that you are not interested in using the brain

Dig up your arse you will.find yours

[BacktoCricaddict]

8 hours ago, Gollum said:

There would have been anger no doubt, because so many 370 chases, same story.

 

But what we are seeing with Bumrah is agenda, mischief. 

Not comparing the 2 situations. Just lamenting the lack of maturity of people hiding behind online anonymity.

[rollingstoned]

2 hours ago, New guy said:

Example do kaise appease karte hai? Numbers la kar baat karo

 

Hindus are growing richer everyday, have more and more representation in every field, from police to IAS to any government job or private job Hindus are more and the top leadership are mostly Hindus, we live longer, are more healthy, more educated while all other religions are going opposite.

 

To kaisa appeasement dhakkan? Marriage laws? Talak? Isko appeasement bolte hai?

 

In all the real things that matter Hindus are growing more and doing better. 

 

Ek google search se pata chal jata hai kitna real appeasement hai, jo tere jaise padhe likhe propaganda swallowing moorkh kar nahi sakta.

 

Tujhe pata hai minority appeasement kisko bolte hai?

 

65 to 70% Indians are non vegetarians. Phir bhi unko Ghar nahi milta, kai jagah sirf veg serve karte hai, har occasion par non veg band, bahut jagah non veg le jana band

 

Isko bolte hai minority appeasement when a small % of veg hold everyone hostage and discriminate in job, house and everywhere against the majority non veg.

 

Tujhe agar minority appeasement se problem hoti to pahle iske khilaf awaz uthata

 

Teri samajh ke bahar hai

 

 

Clear eg. of where education has failed someone and they confuse irrational emoting with cognition ie what every brainlet libtard suffers from in abundance. You should learn what appeasement means first before bothering to spout rank nonsense. One look at public schemes and who avails them as a % of the population if you want to know who is being appeased and how certain communities have been depicted in pop culture esp is enough to blow what you are trying to claim to smithereens without any more digging. Most of what you described as 'progress' among Hindus did not come at the behest of any govt intervention at giving them a leg up, it happened despite just like certain communities remaining backward happened despite every attempt at bending over backwards to pamper and placate them even after they said they want a separate country and cannot live with anyone who belongs to any other religion. The fact that nation wide pogroms and cleansing didn't take place based on that 1 aspect of history alone is itself evidence of a massive industrial level brainwashing that had to be perpetrated on a whole population to whitewash a fact of history regardless of it's merits. 

 

It is not discrimination if you enforce what you want to inside your own private property btw ie if for eg you do not want to give your house to someone or do not want to allow someone in it is entirely a natural right and a prerogative which no state can intercede in and this goes for groups/communities too. You cannot demand Muslims serve non-halal food and claim it is discrimination. Consider this the one new thing you learnt today.

[Lone Wolf]

1 hour ago, Forever Indian said:

Not as much abuse as Gambhir would have got and his CV would have looked damn bad with 3 straight Test series losses!

 

Just look at the celebrations and how Gambhir looked like a man who just got news that he saved his million dollar job!

 

 

The YT channel name

[neel roy]

12 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

The Bumrah thread made me think of this.

 

Just imagine all the nikamma online crowd going after our players if we had lost narrowly by 1 wicket.  Especially Siraj and Akash Deep would have been continuously abused for the 6-catches on the rope. 

 

These guys could've done everything exactly the same, but all it would've taken is for the ball to slip from Siraj's hand on the last yorker. Every other heroic thing he did would have been forgotten. Playing 5 tests. Bowling some ridiculous number of overs. Taking 22 wickets. Giving it his all at the end. None of that would've mattered one bit. Akash Deep's 66 would be completely deleted from memory. 

 

It's crazy to see how many people tag their self-worth to the success of the teams/players that they (supposedly) support. 

They would have copped zero. The retards would say India lost as Bumrah didnt play. Should have played. Why did he rest. Thats the problem of being the best in world. Everyone will try to bring you down. Some gadha said after Bumrah couldn’t bowl in second innings in sydney why cant he bowl with short run up. Is he scared 

[Mariyam]

@rollingstoned

Not that I necessarily disagree with what you’ve said:

 

However what exactly is the relevance of Muslim appeasement in the context of the aftermath of this test victory? 
 

[diga]

1 hour ago, Mariyam said:

@rollingstoned

Not that I necessarily disagree with what you’ve said:

 

However what exactly is the relevance of Muslim appeasement in the context of the aftermath of this test victory? 
 

sorry to barge in ..but you should ask him since he bought it up and triggered 

https://www.indiancricketfans.com/topic/137081-how-much-abuse-would-siraj-and-akash-deep-have-copped-if-we-had-narrowly-lost-oval/#findComment-5251955

 

 

[rollingstoned]

1 hour ago, Mariyam said:

@rollingstoned

Not that I necessarily disagree with what you’ve said:

 

However what exactly is the relevance of Muslim appeasement in the context of the aftermath of this test victory? 
 

@Suhaan started this, he mentioned how Siraj is not being criticized because of his religion or something to that effect. Wasn't needed IMO.

[BacktoCricaddict]

We should start taking betting wagers on how many replies in a thread before it turns into sectarian BS.

[gattaca]

@BacktoCricaddict honestly our fielding is very poor dropped 5 catches in first test. Siraj dropped a simple catch of brook which could have ended the match then and there. Akash deep dropping a catch in crucial moment for him it is mostly about staying on near the edge of the rope. This was a poor series to be honest poor fielding from both sides. This is billed as the best series in a while. England does this useless hype of low quality cricket just like Bazball. 

[BacktoCricaddict]

4 minutes ago, gattaca said:

@BacktoCricaddict honestly our fielding is very poor dropped 5 catches in first test. Siraj dropped a simple catch of brook which could have ended the match then and there. Akash deep dropping a catch in crucial moment for him it is mostly about staying on near the edge of the rope. This was a poor series to be honest poor fielding from both sides. This is billed as the best series in a while. England does this useless hype of low quality cricket just like Bazball. 

Agreed. Valid criticism.

 

But I'm saying that it would have been fodder for vitriolic online abuse had we lost. Glad we didn't have to find out. 

 

Unfortunately the victory redirected the vitriol in Bumrah's direction.

Edited August 8, 2025 by BacktoCricaddict

[gattaca]

6 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

Agreed. Valid criticism.

 

But I'm saying that it would have been fodder for vitriolic online abuse had we lost. Glad we didn't have to find out. 

 

Unfortunately the victory redirected the vitriol in Bumrah's direction.

Yes absolutely Indian audience is still not matured. Remember what happened to arshdeep. People need to vent if not Siraj then it will be bumrah. Venting is coping mechanism for failures. Most people who vent don’t have anything to do. We also have Sunil Gavaskar and Pathan doing this. It’s just human psychology unfortunately. 

Edited August 8, 2025 by gattaca

[BacktoCricaddict]

Just now, gattaca said:

Yes absolutely Indian audience is still not matured. Remember what happened to arshdeep. People need to vent if not Siraj then it will be bumrah. Venting is coping mechanism for failures. It’s just human psychology unfortunately. 

For whose failures? It's like our self worth is tied to strangers performing well. Bizarre. 

[Gollum]

1 hour ago, rollingstoned said:

@Suhaan started this, he mentioned how Siraj is not being criticized because of his religion or something to that effect. Wasn't needed IMO.

@Suhaan is a nice guy, excellent poster. Btw he was a big backer of Siraj here when most of us were fed up of him, me especially, I ranted so much against him in 2023-24, his OTT antics (RCB influence) and no shows annoyed me no end. Here Suhaan's potshots were politics related, could have been avoided, I feel the same way as you in that regard. 

 

Most of us here have made posts which we later regret, happens in heat of the moment. Since this site isn't moderated much, these kind of flare ups are more common. Still would urge ICFers to maybe have a private word, or ignore and go, when they feel strongly about something. Even report button can be used to prevent digression or hard feelings. 

 

ICF is a tiny community, probably <100 active members, who knows whether it will even be running 2 years from now, this forum culture is dying everywhere because of reddit. Nobody wins by fighting or having bad blood with the few active posters we have left over here. I myself regret some stupid fights I got into in the past. I avoid politics and contentious topics (those 2 months of Pahalgam/Sindoor were an exception), ladna hi hai toh there are other SM platforms with millions participating. But without ICF, there is no other equivalent platform for us Indian cricket enthusiasts. 

Edited August 8, 2025 by Gollum

[Gollum]

27 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

Agreed. Valid criticism.

 

But I'm saying that it would have been fodder for vitriolic online abuse had we lost. Glad we didn't have to find out. 

 

Unfortunately the victory redirected the vitriol in Bumrah's direction.

This is what I don't understand.

 

Venting/ranting is understandable when we lose. But why when we win? Who thought we could win that when they were 330/4? 

 

Compared to NZ and Aus series, this was a positive result for us, with many youngsters/rookies doing well, team showing that it could win in the absence of our biggest weapons like Pant, Bumrah, Kuldeep.