Manucrick Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 Just now, maniac said: Or because they are fans of RCB and Punjab- 2 teams he played for Hope he not going to play wc maniac 1
rollingstoned Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 This guy has the same disease of looking to hit cute shots behind square too often and doing it even more under pressure like Sky and Dk. Had he hit that super over ball straight it might even have gone for 6. Suhaan 1
tapandrun Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 (edited) Its not sanju vs jitesh vs pant vs kishan vs some1-else. Ind does not have wk suited for t20i batting. No one has the game. No one walks in the playing 11 on their batting own. Sanju has not done much in mo either. Its a simple template in t20 format, if wk does not make into batting line-up on their batting alone they need to open the innings and maximize pp and take risks if needed to do so. Ind inserted Gill who is not suited to t20i cricket now that balance is gone.You can pick any wk aviable to Ind right now you will find the same issue. If this sort of change to the format was done to bring in some1 like vaibhav it would have made sense, but gill now they are making a team where 2 players are not suited for the format::: GIll + Any wk currently in Ind. Edited November 21, 2025 by tapandrun Vk1 1
maniac Posted November 21, 2025 Author Posted November 21, 2025 1 minute ago, tapandrun said: Its not sanju vs jitesh vs pant vs kishan vs some1-else. Ind does not have wk suited for t20i batting. No one has the game. No one walks in the playing 11 on their batting own. Sanju has not done much in mo either. Its a simple template in t20 format, if wk does not make into batting line-up on their batting alone they need to open the innings and maximize pp and take risks if needed to do so. Ind inserted Gill who is not suited to t20i cricket not that balance is gone.You can pick any wk aviable to Ind right now you will find the same issue. If this sort of change to the format was done to bring in some1 like vaibhav it would have made sense, but gill now they are making a team where 2 players are not suited for the format::: GIll + Any wk currently in Ind. best option is to go for a keeper slot in top 3
tapandrun Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 2 minutes ago, maniac said: best option is to go for a keeper slot in top 3 Yes, wk has play in top 3, but issue with sanju (who seems to be the best option rt. now for T20is) is he also mis-hits/mis-times and pp gives him that cushion where mis-hit lands outside inner circle during pp. The reason why he is not good in mo is that he has tendency to mis-hit v.often and that too when the situtation is not that good. maniac 1
Manucrick Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 10 minutes ago, tapandrun said: Its not sanju vs jitesh vs pant vs kishan vs some1-else. Ind does not have wk suited for t20i batting. No one has the game. No one walks in the playing 11 on their batting own. Sanju has not done much in mo either. Its a simple template in t20 format, if wk does not make into batting line-up on their batting alone they need to open the innings and maximize pp and take risks if needed to do so. Ind inserted Gill who is not suited to t20i cricket not that balance is gone.You can pick any wk aviable to Ind right now you will find the same issue. If this sort of change to the format was done to bring in some1 like vaibhav it would have made sense, but gill now they are making a team where 2 players are not suited for the format::: GIll + Any wk currently in Ind. Sanju did well as a opener
Vk1 Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 (edited) Today is the first time I have seen a complete innings of his where he has batted for more than 20+ balls.. he looked very ordinary Edited November 21, 2025 by Vk1 tapandrun 1
Vk1 Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 17 minutes ago, tapandrun said: Its not sanju vs jitesh vs pant vs kishan vs some1-else. Ind does not have wk suited for t20i batting. No one has the game. No one walks in the playing 11 on their batting own. Sanju has not done much in mo either. Its a simple template in t20 format, if wk does not make into batting line-up on their batting alone they need to open the innings and maximize pp and take risks if needed to do so. Ind inserted Gill who is not suited to t20i cricket not that balance is gone.You can pick any wk aviable to Ind right now you will find the same issue. If this sort of change to the format was done to bring in some1 like vaibhav it would have made sense, but gill now they are making a team where 2 players are not suited for the format::: GIll + Any wk currently in Ind. each position in t20 is critical.. imagine having two players who are likely candidates to being retired out on most occasions tapandrun 1
Vk1 Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 23 minutes ago, rollingstoned said: This guy has the same disease of looking to hit cute shots behind square too often and doing it even more under pressure like Sky and Dk. Had he hit that super over ball straight it might even have gone for 6. SKY should not be put in same sentence as DK or worse Jitesh
bowl_out Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 Samson will still perform better than this guy even if played in the lower order Manucrick 1
tapandrun Posted November 21, 2025 Posted November 21, 2025 29 minutes ago, Manucrick said: Sanju did well as a opener yes as an opener, thats where team should have their wk batting in t20i if they are not pooran/klasen/buttler type of ability
maniac Posted March 11 Author Posted March 11 lol at people thinking he was a better option than Samson or Kishen. Suhaan 1
tapandrun Posted March 11 Posted March 11 19 minutes ago, maniac said: lol at people thinking he was a better option than Samson or Kishen. Its a simple template in t20 format, if wk does not make into batting line-up on their batting alone they need to open the innings and maximize pp and take risks if needed to do so. Ultimate_Game and maniac 1 1
vvvslaxman Posted March 11 Posted March 11 (edited) 1 hour ago, maniac said: lol at people thinking he was a better option than Samson or Kishen. Even with Samson not firing , Jitesh convincingly proved he is a muppet when he came to bat in super over instead of Sooryavanshi and as an icing on the cake got cleaned up the most ugly way possible in the first ball. Edited March 11 by vvvslaxman Lord, Vk1, maniac and 2 others 1 3 1
Vk1 Posted March 12 Posted March 12 The gutsy decision to drop Gill proved to be the game changer. It transformed the team. Srinivasan never allowed MSD to be removed from captaincy forget dropping him Suhaan, maniac, Soorma Bhopali and 1 other 4
Manucrick Posted March 12 Posted March 12 8 hours ago, maniac said: lol at people thinking he was a better option than Samson or Kishen. Jithesh not even a international materiel maniac 1
Nikhil_cric Posted March 12 Posted March 12 11 hours ago, maniac said: lol at people thinking he was a better option than Samson or Kishen. He is better if we needed a keeper to bat in the lower order
maniac Posted March 12 Author Posted March 12 14 hours ago, Nikhil_cric said: He is better if we needed a keeper to bat in the lower order We don’t. In Odis keeper can play in middle order 4-5-6. As much as I dislike Rahul, in no universe is Jitesh a better batsman than Rahul and that includes even 6 hitting. in t20s keeper has to bat top 3 for flexibility. in ODIs top 6 and has to be proper multi dimensional bat who can play stabilizing knock or slog. in tests even though the days of specialist keepers are gone, I am ok with top 7 batter for a keeper.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now