diga Posted May 5 Posted May 5 34 minutes ago, bsriharsha said: https://www.aninews.in/news/national/politics/will-not-resign-did-not-lose-i-will-not-go-to-raj-bhavan-mamata-banerjee-after-bengal-election-results20260505175006/ All this randirona can be done if you've run a credible government for the last 15 years instead of turning Bengal into a cesspit. Dramebaazi....she will be unceremoniously kicked out
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 7 minutes ago, straighttalk said: If I go by the social media post .people are just happy to see TMC out....BJP will rule for at least 2-3 elections as tmc will be finished. Some people are happy because of the bjps communal angle....but majority are hopeful that BJP will bring in jobs and industry. I am sceptical...as the condition of India under BJP rule is abysmal. I do expect some of the bjps crony capitalists to set up toke one or two industries to show progress...but don't expect any structural improvements to West Bengal. And this is not just bjps fault....Bengal lacks the culture of business and industry ...is not entrepreneural...but still some investment is better than nothing. Over time the vacuum will be filled and I expect it will be left front who voted BJP to get rid of mamata that will challenge BJP in bengal....as they are also a idelsogicsl cadre based party. And BJP will fill itself with trinamul goons...already you could see the goons behavior with women journalist when the BJP state president was interviewing ..it's on ani website...samik had to intervene as he knew he was in camera. Not a fan of BJP but Bengalis deserve this chance to get some development. Hopefully a much more credible opposition is forming in 2031 etc which can hold the bjp accountable. The problem is the lack of opposition which enables mamata to do whatever she wants.
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 1 minute ago, diga said: Dramebaazi....she will be unceremoniously kicked out Sharam nahin hai. Always figured with what I thought of her and her party.
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 And illegal immigrantion in Assam , bengal is a valid issue. There's no pussyfooting that.
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 And for all Bengal and their historical intellectual leanings , this version of Bengal has been very much against that. No one denies what Bengalis have contributed to having the Indian nation. But 80 years of misrule (by commies and then the tmc (which is commie even if not in name) does lead a huge section of the state into intellectual, moral and ethical bankruptcy straighttalk 1
coffee_rules Posted May 5 Posted May 5 1 hour ago, gattaca said: Ashwin getting attacked by dmk supporters This Brahmin hate is the basis of all Dravidian politics TN since the 60s. It will never go away even today on social media they will mark them, even after chasing many of them away out of their state.
MechEng Posted May 5 Posted May 5 5 hours ago, Gollum said: Dialoguebaazi and bullying the weak, anyone can do. Can we be a police state with China like development. Woh bhi chalega Sgattick10 1
coffee_rules Posted May 5 Posted May 5 5 hours ago, rangeelaraja said: … she has left for Medina Usko ghusne dene tab na! She will have to conhbert to enter Kaaba Medina
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 Mamata's enablers like Derek O Brien , mahua moitra , Abhishek bannerjee need to be held into account first. Don't enable an already senile idiot to slip down further.
MechEng Posted May 5 Posted May 5 10 hours ago, gattaca said: Renaming might not be an issue for you. But it is for lot of people. These guys did atrocities on Hindus and roads should be named after them ? They are not even Indians they are from Central Asia. That is where the problem is - avenging something that occurred at a time when there was no concept of India does not solve our current issues. We're just handing over our nation to the duopolies under the garb of deshbhakti. straighttalk 1
vvvslaxman Posted May 5 Posted May 5 9 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: This Brahmin hate is the basis of all Dravidian politics TN since the 60s. It will never go away even today on social media they will mark them, even after chasing many of them away out of their state. Brahmins supported DMK more than ADMK for years. Even now there are a lot of Brahmins supporting DMK. There is a small group that does this. If you go through his comment section vast majority are against this guy. coffee_rules 1
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said: Brahmins supported DMK more than ADMK for years. Even now there are a lot of Brahmins supporting DMK. There is a small group that does this. If you go through his comment section vast majority are against this guy. Exactly Brahmins were always more supportive of DMK than aDMK
bsriharsha Posted May 5 Posted May 5 And let's face it , Iyer/Iyengar vote really doesn't matter in Tamil Nadu
velu Posted May 5 Posted May 5 9 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Brahmins supported DMK more than ADMK for years. Even now there are a lot of Brahmins supporting DMK. There is a small group that does this. If you go through his comment section vast majority are against this guy. then they deserve whatever hate they get Kamalhasan is the perfect example of Whatever dmk paints as a Brahmin , total sellout
vvvslaxman Posted May 5 Posted May 5 2 minutes ago, velu said: then they deserve whatever hate they get Kamalhasan is the perfect example of Whatever dmk paints as a Brahmin , total sellout I don't think they are hated. That is just a political narrative from both sides.
G_B_ Posted May 5 Author Posted May 5 1 hour ago, Stan AF said: Both are facts. Bjp doesn't want a ruling regional party. So you sabotage them internally. Admk also knows this and they screw you over by not giving vote transfer. I don't have to choose between facts. As for the rest the your post I also await with baited breath of a post modi shah time. you know that somebody wants to sabotage you internally, so you ally with them and give them 33 seats (on the BJP symbol), up from 20 last time and dont transfer your vote. In the process, you also end up from 66 seats to 47 seats cause you also fight less seats cause you have given more to somebody that wants to sabotage you internally? This sounds like a very sane strategy. I dont think EPS as cunning as you claim him to be. As i said, the two truths dont hold. Let us agree to disagree. Hopefully you keep waiting a while. My wait is likely to be very short. velu and ravishingravi 2
Nikhil_cric Posted May 5 Posted May 5 (edited) 1 hour ago, velu said: media is pro dmk max … I still maintain dmk / admk are better than congress/bjp/commie governments anywhere else in india They suck at developing cities but that's an issue throughout the country . However, the likes of Hyderabad are overtaking Chennai Edited May 5 by Nikhil_cric
Gollum Posted May 5 Posted May 5 (edited) 56 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Brahmins supported DMK more than ADMK for years. Even now there are a lot of Brahmins supporting DMK. There is a small group that does this. If you go through his comment section vast majority are against this guy. 54 minutes ago, bsriharsha said: Exactly Brahmins were always more supportive of DMK than aDMK 44 minutes ago, velu said: then they deserve whatever hate they get Kamalhasan is the perfect example of Whatever dmk paints as a Brahmin , total sellout From what I have seen, Tamil Brahmins mostly support BJP and AIADMK. Few outliers support communists. But they are too less to make any difference, except 1-2 constitiuencies like Mylapore. Edited May 5 by Gollum
vvvslaxman Posted May 5 Posted May 5 5 minutes ago, Gollum said: From what I have seen, Tamil Brahmins mostly support BJP and AIADMK. Few outliers support communists. But they are too less to make any difference, except 1-2 constitiuencies like Mylapore. I am talking about past. For years they were behind DMK.
Recommended Posts