LordPrabhzy Posted May 5 Posted May 5 18 hours ago, straighttalk said: Love it...please do it....thats what bengal voted for. Oh yes.. the tired and subjugated Hindus of Bengal who were trampled on by TMC for decades and their lives and culture changed due to state sponsored illegal demography change ( which is also a national security issue)- so yes thats what THEY voted for. Not the vermin kanglus coffee_rules 1
straighttalk Posted May 5 Posted May 5 16 minutes ago, LordPrabhzy said: Oh yes.. the tired and subjugated Hindus of Bengal who were trampled on by TMC for decades and their lives and culture changed due to state sponsored illegal demography change ( which is also a national security issue)- so yes thats what THEY voted for. Not the vermin kanglus Why are you getting bent out of shape .I loved your idea and excited to see it put into action. Mas murder and genocide is something very in line with bjps way of thinking ..so super excited to see it happen and you all cheering. That's the way we can shine in the world stage..of course. As for state sponsored demography change ..since when is bsf and international border under states purview . God ruled over India for 15 years...fence the border or get more troops to stop illegal immigration. Many of these people came way before mamata came to power. But hey let's not get facts get into the way of genocide.
straighttalk Posted May 5 Posted May 5 2 hours ago, bsriharsha said: Not a fan of BJP but Bengalis deserve this chance to get some development. Hopefully a much more credible opposition is forming in 2031 etc which can hold the bjp accountable. The problem is the lack of opposition which enables mamata to do whatever she wants. I don't think mamata had a lack of opposition... She had BJP. She basically followed the left playbook and handicapped herself with the anti industry position of hers. The corruption and law and order cases as well as the syndicate raj is what broke the game. Left has the same but like RSS they are a idelsogical party with strict discipline..so it didn't get so perverse. This is the primary reason for the dissatisfaction and led to her loss. BJP did use the false narrative of Hindu people at risk...no where in India are Hindus at risk but in a state bordering bangladesh and appeasement done by mamata..the story found its footing. As I said many times..if BJP focuses on development they will be doing well. If they try communal stuff or language stuff ..they will receive a massive rejection ..their core voters buy that crap but not the ones who delivered this mandate. Mamata might be too old but the cpim will oust BJP pretty soon if they can't deliver or rather focus on wrong things. If they do both ..then it would be trickier one but I guess people will still vote for BJP. Mariyam and bsriharsha 1 1
gattaca Posted May 5 Posted May 5 (edited) 2 hours ago, MechEng said: That is where the problem is - avenging something that occurred at a time when there was no concept of India does not solve our current issues. We're just handing over our nation to the duopolies under the garb of deshbhakti. What avenging ? Changing name to represent bharat culture. There is no avenging in this. It’s reclaiming bharatiya culture. If Muslims think changing name is avenging then god help them. Earlier it was Stockholm syndrome naming after the abuser. Edited May 5 by gattaca G_B_ and mishra 2
G_B_ Posted May 5 Author Posted May 5 I think 2 brahmins have won on TVK tickets. A three-way contest helped them i think
mishra Posted May 5 Posted May 5 Can anyone explain to me what is difference between the way Tamils voted to a Film Star vs the way Pakistani voted for a Cricket Star? I mean seriously And some people keep claiming how educated and intellectually advanced Tamils are?
gattaca Posted May 5 Posted May 5 (edited) 18 minutes ago, G_B_ said: I think 2 brahmins have won on TVK tickets. A three-way contest helped them i think TVK got 36 percent vote share percentage. DMK lost 14 percent and Admk lost 12 percent. People have moved from Dravidian parties. Quite a big loss for Dravidian parties. Edited May 5 by gattaca
gattaca Posted May 5 Posted May 5 7 minutes ago, mishra said: Can anyone explain to me what is difference between the way Tamils voted to a Film Star vs the way Pakistani voted for a Cricket Star? I mean seriously And some people keep claiming how educated and intellectually advanced Tamils are? Both are fanatics. mishra 1
Mariyam Posted May 5 Posted May 5 (edited) 30 minutes ago, mishra said: Can anyone explain to me what is difference between the way Tamils voted to a Film Star vs the way Pakistani voted for a Cricket Star? I mean seriously And some people keep claiming how educated and intellectually advanced Tamils are? Electing new people is a sign of being intellectually advanced. Keeps politicians on their toes. Keeps them afraid. Unlike a UP or MP where the same people have been in power for so long and they tend to take their power for granted. Pak Awaam are retarded because they are under the illusion of having a choice. Cricketer or Shariffs or Bhutto are selected by their fauj. Edited May 5 by Mariyam
govinda Posted May 5 Posted May 5 23 minutes ago, mishra said: Can anyone explain to me what is difference between the way Tamils voted to a Film Star vs the way Pakistani voted for a Cricket Star? I mean seriously And some people keep claiming how educated and intellectually advanced Tamils are? Atleast they don't vote for thugs and fake baba like bimarus straighttalk 1
G_B_ Posted May 5 Author Posted May 5 30 minutes ago, gattaca said: TVK got 36 percent vote share percentage. DMK lost 14 percent and Admk lost 12 percent. People have moved from Dravidian parties. Quite a big loss for Dravidian parties. 36 % without alliance is impressive
straighttalk Posted May 5 Posted May 5 1 hour ago, randomGuy said: Like a true blood secualar Congress Wala...had he been a core vhp bajrang dal cadre...he would have shuddered at the though of such public display of affection as the bajrang thugs used to beat up so many young couples
straighttalk Posted May 5 Posted May 5 9 minutes ago, govinda said: Atleast they don't vote for thugs and fake baba like bimarus Dotn forget to add rapists and criminals and genocidal maniacs...
straighttalk Posted May 5 Posted May 5 (edited) 3 hours ago, MechEng said: That is where the problem is - avenging something that occurred at a time when there was no concept of India does not solve our current issues. We're just handing over our nation to the duopolies under the garb of deshbhakti. Let's be very clear...there is no deshbhakti..there is hindubhakti...they are different. India is secular. This is a fight to change the definition of what India is..this is not a issue of patriotism. As ajit doval said most people working for Paksitan are Hindus...so this claim that Muslims are against India is a full on fabricated narrative ...there are Muslim terrorists and Muslim patriots...same as Hindu anti nationalists as well as Hindu patriots. Edited May 5 by straighttalk
randomGuy Posted May 5 Posted May 5 10 minutes ago, straighttalk said: Like a true blood secualar Congress Wala...had he been a core vhp bajrang dal cadre...he would have shuddered at the though of such public display of affection as the bajrang thugs used to beat up so many young couples Spoken like a true zubair follower. Bajrang dal saves lives of 1000 upon 1000s of women, their families. coffee_rules 1
velu Posted May 5 Posted May 5 2 hours ago, kepler37b said: Man almost all of these faces are so punchable. Grade A retards. they got 5$ per person .. i am sure our @Laaloo & @Cricketics know the rates Cricketics and Laaloo 2
Recommended Posts