Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I have to call this out for anyone who has seen or not seen this film.

 

It's not a documentary approved by five eyes. It's a masala spy thriller rooted in some real world events and some fantasy. It's literally in the 2 minute long disclosure. 

 

It's at best fantasy take on historical events like Inglorious basterds except with some factually corroborated events. And that second part is genius. 

Posted
13 hours ago, zen said:

Part 2 of Dhurandhar is coming in March-April 2026 if I recall correctly. 
 

In the Manchurian Candidate (1962), an American soldier is made a war hero for the Americans by the Chinese so he can rise in politics to eventually become the US President. The Part 2 of Dhurandhar  could touch upon this concept, while also giving the backstory of Ranveer’s character (most likely based on a Dirty Dozen type character).  

Your knowledge of movies :hatsoff::hatsoff:..

 

 

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, kepler37b said:

 

This movie is a pan india multiplex hit. It is very much UNLIKE pushpa. Pushpa was a hit among masses and single screens.  

 

Booked a ticket this Monday morning and had to act fast to get a booking for coming Saturday 11 pm show. All other slots were either booked or filling up super fast.

Edited by MechEng
Posted
6 hours ago, kepler37b said:

the-ranveer-vs-ranbir-debate-through-the

 

Next two super stars of hindi cinema. 

Baigan, neither of the two are "superstars".
Superstar culture is finished now in Bollywood....Vicky Kaushal did an amazing work in "Chhava" and "Sardar Udham Singh" while Sid Malhotra in "Shershah"...yet they couldn't keep it up.
In a way it;s good...we need the writer/director dominated movie industry.

Posted
48 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Baigan, neither of the two are "superstars".
Superstar culture is finished now in Bollywood....Vicky Kaushal did an amazing work in "Chhava" and "Sardar Udham Singh" while Sid Malhotra in "Shershah"...yet they couldn't keep it up.
In a way it;s good...we need the writer/director dominated movie industry.

Mr. Vivek Singh reddy ji...:bumsmack:..you are ignoring the social reality.

 

Individual worship is across the board in Indian society. The cult of Kohli in this phorum is an example, before that there was dhoni and Tendu before that.

 

Same for movies also. There might be lull, but we will get back to normal service soon. 

Posted
1 hour ago, singhvivek141 said:

Baigan, neither of the two are "superstars".
Superstar culture is finished now in Bollywood....Vicky Kaushal did an amazing work in "Chhava" and "Sardar Udham Singh" while Sid Malhotra in "Shershah"...yet they couldn't keep it up.
In a way it;s good...we need the writer/director dominated movie industry.

Sid Malhotra was Always eye candy for Girls he was never superstar material with his terrible acting skills.  Even Shershah was a OTT release so even Kartik Aryan would have made same impact as Sid.

 

Ranbir is definitely the superstar though.  That guy gets big budget movies easily, is scion of Kapoor family..  acts well enough. 

 

He is definitely far ahead of likes of Kaushal and Ranveer as of yet.

Posted
36 minutes ago, kepler37b said:

Mr. Vivek Singh reddy ji...:bumsmack:..you are ignoring the social reality.

 

Individual worship is across the board in Indian society. The cult of Kohli in this phorum is an example, before that there was dhoni and Tendu before that.

 

Same for movies also. There might be lull, but we will get back to normal service soon. 

Social Media has changed everything bro.

That aura of the sense of suspense is now long gone.

Not to mention, majority of these so called "superstars" have joke of a personality in real world...which when exposed courtesy of SM dents their image.

Likes of MS, Tendulkar, Kohli were of present SM era..hence they escaped this criticism.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said:

Sid Malhotra was Always eye candy for Girls he was never superstar material with his terrible acting skills.  Even Shershah was a OTT release so even Kartik Aryan would have made same impact as Sid.

 

Ranbir is definitely the superstar though.  That guy gets big budget movies easily, is scion of Kapoor family..  acts well enough. 

 

He is definitely far ahead of likes of Kaushal and Ranveer as of yet.

Nah, Kaushal is better actor, Simply because when I watch his movie, I dont see Vicky Kaushal, But just the character he is representing.

 

 

Saying that, for first time, Dhurandhar, I only see Dhurandhar and not the actor behind it

Posted
4 hours ago, mishra said:

Nah, Kaushal is better actor, Simply because when I watch his movie, I dont see Vicky Kaushal, But just the character he is representing.

 

 

Not talking about raw acting skills, in general Kaushal is definitely superior.

Ranbir has been there longer and his filmography is bigger and better.

Posted
5 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Sid Malhotra was Always eye candy for Girls he was never superstar material with his terrible acting skills.  Even Shershah was a OTT release so even Kartik Aryan would have made same impact as Sid.

 

Ranbir is definitely the superstar though.  That guy gets big budget movies easily, is scion of Kapoor family..  acts well enough. 

 

He is definitely far ahead of likes of Kaushal and Ranveer as of yet.

May be he is getting movies but on acting alone both R cant tie Vicky shoelace.

×
×
  • Create New...