Laaloo Posted March 12 Posted March 12 Indians have no bloody shame. Lining up to fill pockets of this jihadi pig who mocks Indian and indians day in and day out. Must be laughing all the way to the bank. Frigging cucks. EnterTheVoid and putrevus 2
vvvslaxman Posted March 12 Posted March 12 There is a funny fight going on between SRH fans and RCB fsns. All RCB fans suddenly started showing outrage. But entire RCB was rooting for England and NZ during world cup as their favorite kohlis legacy was overshadowed by this team. They wre calling this a team of sloggers. lol SRH fans troll them back you were against India whole world cup. Stan AF 1
bsriharsha Posted March 12 Author Posted March 12 This is a get out of jail card. Buy him, watch him fail and then say that none of them are any good.
IndianRenegade Posted March 12 Posted March 12 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: We still play against their team in neutral venue. So not sure this selective outrage affecting just one individual will make any difference. When pcb said we won't play with India why didnt bcci say we won't play eithrer. the comparison is apples to oranges. We play with them for international commitments, the US which santions the heck out of countries still continues to keep most of its international commitments in sports. There is an hypocrisy wrt. grouping Pak in the same group as India, which should certainly be addressed. But to equate international comittments to going out of your way to buy individuals who explicitly mock deaths of your civillans is pathetic behavior. Suhaan, Ironhide and G_B_ 1 2
vvvslaxman Posted March 12 Posted March 12 (edited) 6 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: the comparison is apples to oranges. We play with them for international commitments, the US which santions the heck out of countries still continues to keep most of its international commitments in sports. There is an hypocrisy wrt. grouping Pak in the same group as India, which should certainly be addressed. But to equate international comittments to going out of your way to buy individuals who explicitly mock deaths of your civillans is pathetic behavior. But if we are going to be patriotic cannot.be selectively patriotic. If BCCi does it for money these franchisees do it for money as well. We have been playing them for 50 years. We have had them as commies coaches during this period. We have gone to pakistan to play other sports. There is lack of consistency. Ecb could have put pressure on them my guess. So a token pick. Edited March 12 by vvvslaxman
vvvslaxman Posted March 12 Posted March 12 28 minutes ago, bsriharsha said: This is a get out of jail card. Buy him, watch him fail and then say that none of them are any good. Now whole.talk of discrimination will disappear..kavya has taken the bullet
vvvslaxman Posted March 12 Posted March 12 If she had picked usman Tariq the reaction would be less as he doesn't do these political antics as far as I know. Abrar a controversial figure.
IndianRenegade Posted March 12 Posted March 12 (edited) 15 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: But if we are going to be patriotic cannot.be selectively patriotic. If BCCi does it for money these franchisees do it for money as well. We have been playing them for 50 years. We have had them as commies coaches during this period. We have gone to pakistan to play other sports. There is lack of consistency. Ecb could have put pressure on them my guess. So a token pick. you absolutely ignored the fact it is sporting norm to keep your international commitments. Is US playing with NK, Iran for money in international events? No. So why doesn't it tour these nations if it is okay to play them in international events & why don't US entities hire ppl from these countires? Also the whole point of such sanctions is for it to be punititive on the country/person you are imposing it, & show the power differential. It is never a question of fairness, in fact such sanctions are often hypocritical, the US regularly imposes sanctions/trariffs on countries that it has adverserial relationship with, while still dealing with the adversary if it has something that benifits them. Edited March 12 by IndianRenegade
vvvslaxman Posted March 12 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, IndianRenegade said: you absolutely ignored the fact it is sporting norm to keep your international commitments. Is US playing with NK, Iran for money in international events? No. So why doesn't it tour these nations if it is okay to play them in international events & why don't US entities hire ppl from these countires? Also the whole point of such sanctions is for it to be punititive on the country/person you are imposing it, & show the power differential. It is never a question of fairness, in fact such sanctions are often hypocritical, the US regularly imposes sanctions/trariffs on countries that it has adverserial relationship with, while still dealing with the adversary if it has something that benifits them. Not necessarily. Many teams have forfeited matches in the past without any consequences. You lose the points..That's it. Most of our acts are social media driven. Even though MI and KKR already played 3 Pakistanis in ILT20 backlash was nil.
IndianRenegade Posted March 12 Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Not necessarily. Many teams have forfeited matches in the past without any consequences. You lose the points..That's it. Most of our acts are social media driven. Even though MI and KKR already played 3 Pakistanis in ILT20 backlash was nil. where did I ever use the word consequence? The point I made still stands, you keep international commitments while sanctioning the heck out of nation if it benifits you. Cricket is a small sport in terms of the number of countries playing it, keeping international commitments aids the sport. There was no backlash because ppl hardly even know such a tournament exists.
jf1gp_1 Posted March 13 Posted March 13 6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: If she had picked usman Tariq the reaction would be less as he doesn't do these political antics as far as I know. Abrar a controversial figure. This is where Pakistani are so good. Building narrative. Why is the narrative Indians not picking pak player ? why isn't the narrative, pak players have no shame and begging to get into Indian owned team ? we should have started shaming these pak players months ago like they started pre WC. Articles should have been written against how pak players have ditched national pride to play for Indian owner. Suhaan 1
vvvslaxman Posted March 13 Posted March 13 19 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said: This is where Pakistani are so good. Building narrative. Why is the narrative Indians not picking pak player ? why isn't the narrative, pak players have no shame and begging to get into Indian owned team ? we should have started shaming these pak players months ago like they started pre WC. Articles should have been written against how pak players have ditched national pride to play for Indian owner. Because rejections always get attention. It is all about optics.
jf1gp_1 Posted March 13 Posted March 13 46 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Because rejections always get attention. It is all about optics. So build narrative around pak players rejecting Indian franchises. We have a recent example, BD pulled out all due to a certain narrative. Pakistani are far ahead in this field.
G_B_ Posted March 13 Posted March 13 11 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: If she had picked usman Tariq the reaction would be less as he doesn't do these political antics as far as I know. Abrar a controversial figure. People like his backstory. Driving cab in uae and watching msd movie etc.
vvvslaxman Posted March 13 Posted March 13 1 minute ago, G_B_ said: People like his backstory. Driving cab in uae and watching msd movie etc. Yea.. But someone else bought him before i think. Not sure. These auctions are similar to Indian auctions i presume.
Tillu Posted March 13 Posted March 13 Sunrisers Leeds X account suspended amid backlash from Indian supporters for hiring Abrar. They must have mass reported it. Hearing the same stories from MAGA racists about their accounts getting suspended due to mass reporting from Indians which is actually a good thing. Ironhide 1
Manucrick Posted March 13 Posted March 13 abrar is a pig Things wouldn't have been this messy if they had just taken Shadab
putrevus Posted March 13 Posted March 13 I don't think SRH should be in IPL any more, they should be forced to sell their franchise,. LordPrabhzy and rollingstoned 1 1
LordPrabhzy Posted March 13 Posted March 13 15 minutes ago, putrevus said: I don't think SRH should be in IPL any more, they should be forced to sell their franchise,. Yes they can once BCCI stops playing Pak in ICC events. Till that time lets not ignore double standards SRL is under ECB jurisdiction. BCCI has no control over them- fans are getting delusional by the day. CPL Indian owned team also had a Pakistani players
vvvslaxman Posted March 13 Posted March 13 1 hour ago, Tillu said: Sunrisers Leeds X account suspended amid backlash from Indian supporters for hiring Abrar. They must have mass reported it. Hearing the same stories from MAGA racists about their accounts getting suspended due to mass reporting from Indians which is actually a good thing. Not sure why they would suspend account based on troll reporting? I mean X has gone to dogs ever since they made it monetizable Tillu 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now