Lone Wolf Posted June 17 Posted June 17 Don't know what Rahmat is doing... Exposing tail repeatedly. Selfish pro Max knock
Vickydev Posted June 17 Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: That's a bobble with a B. I used to think of you as my friend BacktoCricaddict 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted June 17 Posted June 17 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: GurNoor dismissed GurBaz. Therefore Noor Ahmad > McCullum Vickydev, Lord and vvvslaxman 3
vvvslaxman Posted June 17 Posted June 17 Overall good day for iNdia.. won 2 matches. Women's match will also go in our favor.
The Realist Posted June 17 Posted June 17 Three wicket hauls in each of the first two ODIs for India: Piyush Chawla Gurnoor Brar
Lord Posted June 17 Posted June 17 19 minutes ago, putrevus said: I don't think so , he could have batted at number 5 easily. He scores at around 125 SR. That is very poor for a finisher
Lord Posted June 17 Posted June 17 7 minutes ago, The Realist said: Three wicket hauls in each of the first two ODIs for India: Piyush Chawla Gurnoor Brar Good company. Chawla won 2 ICC trophies
Lord Posted June 17 Posted June 17 24 minutes ago, rollingstoned said: Gurnoor will be a star. Has everything we wish for in a pacer. Talent yes but temperament has to be seen in tougher matches. Ultimate_Game and BacktoCricaddict 2
Lone Wolf Posted June 17 Posted June 17 2 minutes ago, Lord said: Talent yes but temperament has to be seen in tougher matches. Michael Clarke is really impressed... As per him more he plays better he will get. Should play all three ODIs in England as well. express bowling, tapandrun, Sgattick10 and 2 others 1 4
putrevus Posted June 17 Posted June 17 5 minutes ago, Lord said: He scores at around 125 SR. That is very poor for a finisher Krunal Pandya batted for RCB at number 5.Which won back to back.Holder is better than him , for GT he could have easily batted at number 5.
Lord Posted June 17 Posted June 17 Just now, putrevus said: Krunal Pandya batted for RCB at number 5.Which won back to back.Holder is better than him , for GT he could have easily batted at number 5. Thats what I said, he got away due to thier bowling. Was exposed in finals. Krunal wasn't consistent no. 5. Was used as collapse stopper
Ultimate_Game Posted June 17 Posted June 17 18 minutes ago, Lord said: Thats what I said, he got away due to thier bowling. Was exposed in finals. Krunal wasn't consistent no. 5. Was used as collapse stopper Krunal is liek Axar and is rotated across the order. He's sent up to stop collapses and that's one reason his SR is lower. And when the situation is good, he's pushed lower down so Tim David can hit the bowling. If he played at the same spot consistently his stats would be better. Krunal did the hard part for RCB similar to what Axar has done for India, and no surprises both changed the fortunes of their respective teams. There's a reason why Krunal has won 5 IPL trophies and is the only one to win MoM in an IPL final twice! The guy is underrated and should've played for India a lot more. He deserved Sundar's spot in Team India in white ball.
Lord Posted June 17 Posted June 17 5 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: Krunal is liek Axar and is rotated across the order. He's sent up to stop collapses and that's one reason his SR is lower. And when the situation is good, he's pushed lower down so Tim David can hit the bowling. If he played at the same spot consistently his stats would be better. Krunal did the hard part for RCB similar to what Axar has done for India, and no surprises both changed the fortunes of their respective teams. There's a reason why Krunal has won 5 IPL trophies and is the only one to win MoM in an IPL final twice! The guy is underrated and should've played for India a lot more. He deserved Sundar's spot in Team India in white ball. Missed my point
Ultimate_Game Posted June 17 Posted June 17 1 minute ago, Lord said: Missed my point TBF I didn't follow the conversation. It still hurts me to see Sundar in the team when someone who's a better fit for that role sit outside. Axar and Krunal are interchangeable in white-ball cricket, whereas Sundar is a poor man's Jadeja and a misfit. Lord 1
Ultimate_Game Posted June 17 Posted June 17 34 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said: Michael Clarke is really impressed... As per him more he plays better he will get. Should play all three ODIs in England as well. I would have Gurnoor, Prince, Ashok, Mohsin (if fit), Nitish Reddy, Shedge, Madhav Tiwari play continuously for India or India A so we identify 2 key pacers and 2 pace all-rounders. Need to build depth at these positions. We need to have batting depth till 8 and 3-4 pace options to succeed in SA. Bumrah and Pandya are automatic choices and need other spots to be claimed.
Lone Wolf Posted June 17 Posted June 17 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: I would have Gurnoor, Prince, Ashok, Mohsin (if fit), Nitish Reddy, Shedge, Madhav Tiwari play continuously for India or India A so we identify 2 key pacers and 2 pace all-rounders. Need to build depth at these positions. We need to have batting depth till 8 and 3-4 pace options to succeed in SA. Bumrah and Pandya are automatic choices and need other spots to be claimed. My guess is for England ODIs they will pick Bumrah Siraj Gurnoor Harshit/Prasidh. Prince will be part of T20 set up for now. Gurnoor Nabi and co will feature in SL for those 4 day games as well. They should add Ashok in there too. Edited June 17 by Lone Wolf
Ultimate_Game Posted June 17 Posted June 17 Just now, Lone Wolf said: My guess is for England ODIs they will pick Bumrah Siraj Gurnoor Harshit/Prasidh. Prince will be part of T20 set up for now. Gurnoor Nabi and co will feature in SL for those 4 day games as well. They should add Ashok in there too. Siraj should not be there. There's a reason India has won a trophy with Siraj on the bench. When he played India lost. In SA we'll have only 1 or a max 2 spots available for a pacer alongside Bumrah. Pandya and potentially another pace all-rounder (Nitish, Shedge, Tiwari) to complement Pandya. Sundar is not needed as in SA we need a pace all-rounder. Can't compromise on our batting depth till 8.
deepdynamo Posted June 17 Posted June 17 I would hate a spin bowling allrounders like Jadeja, Axar or Washington in SA ODI WC 2027. If you want an allrounder, prepare Nitish Reddy along with Pandya. Play both. Manucrick 1
Lone Wolf Posted June 17 Posted June 17 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said: Siraj should not be there. There's a reason India has won a trophy with Siraj on the bench. When he played India lost. In SA we'll have only 1 or a max 2 spots available for a pacer alongside Bumrah. Pandya and potentially another pace all-rounder (Nitish, Shedge, Tiwari) to complement Pandya. Sundar is not needed as in SA we need a pace all-rounder. Can't compromise on our batting depth till 8. We don't have quality spinner anyways they will go with three proper Pacers + Pace all rounder Reddy + Hardik likely in Highveld especially where all the knockouts will take place. Leaves space for one spin all rounder India v Pak either in Durban or Joburg. Edited June 17 by Lone Wolf express bowling 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now