Jump to content

Why is Dhruv Jurel playing as a pure batsman in our test team?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Surprise surprise, this great batting talent again is out for single digit but according to some geniuses including Gambhir he should be playing ahead of Sarfraz.

 

How many more matches do we need to see this guy flop over and over again.He neither can attack nor defend.

 

11 tests overall he has crossed 50 three times.He is some generational batting talent. He has played bottom feeding teams for majority of his career.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Surprise surprise, this great batting talent again is out for single digit but according to some geniuses including Gambhir he should be playing ahead of Sarfraz.

 

How many more matches do we need to see this guy flop over and over again.He neither can attack nor defend.

 

11 tests overall he has crossed 50 three times.He is some generational batting talent. He has played bottom feeding teams for majority of his career.

Surprise surprise it was a strangle down leg.. unlucky dismissal when everyone is trying to throw their bats

Posted

I have been impressed by technique and temperament since the time I saw him against England at home and then in A tour in Australia.

Even Rahul Dravid rates him highly to get Royals break the bank for him, must have seen something.

 

Hopefully a regular in the XI now and continues to get runs at that position.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Number said:

I have been impressed by technique and temperament since the time I saw him against England at home and then in A tour in Australia.

Even Rahul Dravid rates him highly to get Royals break the bank for him, must have seen something.

 

Hopefully a regular in the XI now and continues to get runs at that position.

 

 

Jurel has a very solid technique against both pace and spin. Looks reassuring. 

 

And he seems equally adept at pulling / hooking and driving the ball while facing pacers.

 

Plus good defense. 

 

Can hit big 6s in tests.

 

Nothing to dislike. 

 

Now that he is averaging 40+ in test cricket, with 2 tons, hopefully he will have the confidence to perform regularly.

 

 

Posted

A 24-25 year old with this kinda technique and temperament doesn't comes often in Indian cricket.

Probably since Kela most technically gifted right hand batter.

 

Great eye test pick by Agarkar. Hopefully Jurel kicks on from here. 

 

Key player in NZ for us when Kookaburra gets old.  Knows how to bat with the tail.

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

A 24-25 year old with this kinda technique and temperament doesn't comes often in Indian cricket.

Probably since Kela most technically gifted right hand batter.

 

Great eye test pick by Agarkar. Hopefully Jurel kicks on from here. 

 

Key player in NZ for us when Kookaburra gets old.  Knows how to bat with the tail.

 

But this is not such an elite bowling attack. Pitches don't really have threatening bounce. Roston chase made 194, Justin greaves 180, Ameer jango 233, Mushfiqur early made 163 at Galle. Alex carey 156.  Their bowling just falls apart after 30 overs or so. 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

But this is not such an elite bowling attack. Pitches don't really have threatening bounce. Roston chase made 194, Justin greaves 180, Ameer jango 233, Mushfiqur early made 163 at Galle. Alex carey 156.  Their bowling just falls apart after 30 overs or so. 

You can only make do what's in front of you Justin Greaves was superb in NZ.  Helped them draw a test in NZ 

 

Has been a dream for Indian batters to bat that long in NZ 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted
8 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

But this is not such an elite bowling attack. Pitches don't really have threatening bounce. Roston chase made 194, Justin greaves 180, Ameer jango 233, Mushfiqur early made 163 at Galle. Alex carey 156.  Their bowling just falls apart after 30 overs or so. 

Chase and Greaves knocks were in the West Indies.  When did SL last have an elite attack?

Posted
1 minute ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Chase and Greaves knocks were in the West Indies.  When did SL last have an elite attack?

 

When they had herath and co. Afte rthat they did okay in patches like they did in SA where even average seamers can look good when they hit the spot.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

You can only make do what's in front of you Justin Greaves was superb in NZ.  Helped them draw a test in NZ 

 

Has been a dream for Indian batters to bat that long in NZ 

Yea.. That is why said Gill and Jaiswal totally botched in this series. Both missed a double 100. Padikkal cashed in. Sai's injury was a blessing in disguise for him.

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

When they had herath and co. Afte rthat they did okay in patches like they did in SA where even average seamers can look good when they hit the spot.

Herath. That's it. There was no other bowler who was particularly good. 

 

These SL seamers are better than they have had in ages. 

 

Even Herath used to get hammered by Indian batsmen 

Posted
Just now, Nikhil_cric said:

Herath. That's it. There was no other bowler who was particularly good. 

 

These SL seamers are better than they have had in ages. 

 

Even Herath used to get hammered by Indian batsmen 

 

Have you looked at the fitness of their bowlers/ They are all fat. Sure they have heart. But they lose it as the match goes on and on. ONly Asitha is half decent. Rest are just okay.

Posted (edited)
Just now, vvvslaxman said:

 

Have you looked at the fitness of their bowlers/ They are all fat. Sure they have heart. But they lose it as the match goes on and on. ONly Asitha is half decent. Rest are just okay.

They have pretty big frames. Also, who were the better bowlers they had even 10 years ago? 

Edited by Nikhil_cric
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Chase and Greaves knocks were in the West Indies.  When did SL last have an elite attack?

Justin Greaves scored 202 not out in Hagley Oval Christchurch as well. 

Historic drawn test for WI in NZ 

Posted
Just now, Lone Wolf said:

Justin Greaves scored 202 not out in Hagley Oval Christchurch as well. 

Historic drawn test for WI in NZ 

Yeah their batting has looked better recently. Roach needs to retire though. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

They have pretty big frames. Also, who were the better bowlers they had even 10 years ago? 

Their batting was good enough to bury the opposition with big score.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Yeah their batting has looked better recently. Roach needs to retire though. 

Yeah, also tells you the importance of having someone who can bat down the order in NZ when Kookaburra gets old and their bowlers get tired.

You obviously needs shots as well.  Strong players of cut and pull do well in NZ especially in Hagley which is quick and bouncy at times 

Posted

Maharoof praising his technique, Pujara saying he is most technically gifted batter in the side after Kela.

 

Ex batting coach saying the same.

His talent was never in doubt.

Ofc NZ series awaits where every modern Indian batter had failed in 2020.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...