Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Bale is better' date=' but I agree with Sooda that Bale is best in intense roles. For example, I dont think Bale can do what Jackman did in Kate and Leopold. That is a major difference between the two.[/quote'] I agree with this.
Posted

Since this thread was started Jackman has also been in Les Mis of course- something that is well beyond Bale, not just the singing bit generally pulling that role off.

Posted
Bale is the better actor for sure. I think he is possibly not as versatile though' date=' Jackman has a bit more range to him. Bale just does one type of character- Intense. And yeah Bale really puts himself through the ringer for his roles too...[/quote'] +1 Hugh can easily come up with a brilliant performance in a musical. Range is good. Intense to light hearted movies. Watch the movie Prisoners. Mind blowing performance by Hugh.
Posted
+1 Hugh can easily come up with a brilliant performance in a musical. Range is good. Intense to light hearted movies. Watch the movie Prisoners. Mind blowing performance by Hugh.
Yeah, he is brilliant in that.
Posted

Just compare their work in " the prestige".bale was better tbh and he is the better actor but I like hugh and he's done justice to various roles

Posted

Hugh Jackman can pull off Rom-Com,Comedies,Musical all of which Bale has no shot at where as Jackman can be equally good at Drama,Action or dark roles...EVen if Bale can be marginally better at those roles as an allrounder Hugh Jackman handsdown. Hugh Jackman can pull off a Fighter(maybe not as good but he definetely can) or a Batman (Wolverine) etc. but Bale can't pull of Real Steel or Les Miserables

×
×
  • Create New...