rkt.india Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 What! laxman was brilliant with the tail with out him we could have lost the mohali test .Against wi you can do what rohit did but against better attacks it will get difficult.so lets nto jump the gun.Best thing is to give confideence to tail . Laxman's inning was great no doubt, but our winning was more to luck than anything else. It was a miracle that Ishant survived so long facing Aussie attack.
CG Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Laxman's inning was great no doubt' date=' but our winning was more to luck than anything else. It was a miracle that Ishant survived so long facing Aussie attack.[/quote'] U make ur own luck.Ishant has always been a gritty tailender.
King Tendulkar Posted November 15, 2013 Author Posted November 15, 2013 What! laxman was brilliant with the tail with out him we could have lost the mohali test .Against wi you can do what rohit did but against better attacks it will get difficult.so lets nto jump the gun.Best thing is to give confideence to tail . Dude re read my post. I agree. I said laxy was ok with tail. I didnt criticise his batting with tail, others did. Go after them!! I just said he had different style to batting with tail, which was correct way considering how he batted
Temujin Khaghan Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 lol... one century and people are already thrashing the one batsman who saved our ass most number of times in test cricket during 2000s
King Tendulkar Posted November 15, 2013 Author Posted November 15, 2013 lol... one century and people are already thrashing the one batsman who saved our ass most number of times in test cricket during 2000s For the record I did not do that. Others did
adi B Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Laxman's inning was great no doubt' date=' but our winning was more to luck than anything else. It was a miracle that Ishant survived so long facing Aussie attack.[/quote'] ishant was not out but ojha was out..tbh i didn't like how lax batted with the tail tbh but then it worked,he did not shield them as much as nohit did,i remember against pak in 2005 in mohali he didn't bat well with the tail,exposed them too much..he let the tail take the strike a bit too much but their slog worked well at durban,in mohali he did well but ishant faced quite a lot of balls as well
rkt.india Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 U make ur own luck.Ishant has always been a gritty tailender. He is gritty yes, but give him a few bouncers at his throat and he will give you catching practice. For me, it was a miracle that he survived for so long playing so many deliveries. Ojha also survived a very close LBW call just before the end.
rkt.india Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 lol... one century and people are already thrashing the one batsman who saved our ass most number of times in test cricket during 2000s No one is thrashing Laxman. He has his own style of batting with tail and he was successful in that. Every player has different strengths, but Laxman was saying Rohit's approach was wrong when he was batting but his approach proved right because he has the ability to play differently that what Laxman used to do.
ganeshran Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Laxman's knock was far better and came under high pressure. Though Kudos to Sharma for playing a matured knock on his debut
G_B_ Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 I think Rohit is the ideal number 6. Has the game to score quick runs. Should be his permanent spot.
jusarrived Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 I think Rohit is the ideal number 6. Has the game to score quick runs. Should be his permanent spot. No he should bat higher . Hes some one who can score big 100s like tendulkar or dravid..should not bat lower than 5 imo
King Tendulkar Posted November 15, 2013 Author Posted November 15, 2013 No he should bat higher . Hes some one who can score big 100s like tendulkar or dravid..should not bat lower than 5 imo True Plus imo he is defo the best player of fast bowling in the India team and is the best backfoot player in the team. Overseas I think he will end up being our most reliable batsman. Put him at number 4 and he could dent the oppos fast bolwers. Making it easier later on for out FTB to prosper:giggle: i.e dhobi
Forever Indian Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 He has fastly matured from being NoHit to TonHit Sharma
express bowling Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Laxman was considered to be a decent strokemaker in the era that he played in. The pre t20 era did not have strokemakers like Rohit, Kohli etc. among specialist batsmen barring a couple of exceptional guys.
Cricketics Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Hos ability to clear the stadium with occasional six is brilliant. He got lot of strength along with his elegant play. Hope this continues.
Trundler27 Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Rohit has just hit a purple patch playing on extremely batting friendly tracks (even though this pitch is a bit challenging but it is his home turf so he is better equipped to deal with it). Now a massive challenge awaits him on the upcoming away tours... so Goodluck to him. Taking nothing away from the magnificent start to his test career though.... Hope he can carry on with the consistency of Pujara.... This test batting line-up can emulate the great line-up of the 2000s (Sehwag, Dravid, Sachin, Lax, Gangu) IF they continue to grow into their test roles and utilize their immense tailunts.
vvvslaxman Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Rohit has just hit a purple patch playing on extremely batting friendly tracks (even though this pitch is a bit challenging but it is his home turf so he is better equipped to deal with it). Now a massive challenge awaits him on the upcoming away tours... so Goodluck to him. Taking nothing away from the magnificent start to his test career though.... Hope he can carry on with the consistency of Pujara.... This test batting line-up can emulate the great line-up of the 2000s (Sehwag, Dravid, Sachin, Lax, Gangu) IF they continue to grow into their test roles and utilize their immense tailunts. True that.. He started with an afridisque ugly hoick for whatever reason.
Trundler27 Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 True that.. He started with an afridisque ugly hoick for whatever reason. :giggle: and ppl are saying that he knows how to bat with the tail.... some of it is just pure luck when things are going your way... so he made the most of it imo... but he has some crazy kaanfidence right now.
coffee_rules Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 He moved from 47 to 49 on the first ball of the 92nd over. Played out 4 dot balls even though there was a chance of a 50 and took the single off the last ball. :hatsoff: A lot of people would have gotten 50 first ! End of over 91 (2 runs) India 416/9 Mohammed Shami 0* (2b) ST Gabriel 15-0-82-1 RG Sharma 47* (50b 4x4 1x6) S Shillingford 35-5-143-5 91.1 Shillingford to Sharma, 2 runs, flighted and full ball, swept firmly towards deep square leg, Rohit wanted two straightaway (unlike in the Ojha run-out) 91.2 Shillingford to Sharma, no run, length ball outside off, driven towards long-on, rejects the single 91.3 Shillingford to Sharma, no run, spins in towards middle, Rohit goes deep in the crease and tucks the ball behind square leg 91.4 Shillingford to Sharma, no run, length ball on off and middle, defended down the track 91.5 Shillingford to Sharma, no run, length ball just outside off, blocked off the front foot 91.6 Shillingford to Sharma, 1 run, length ball, Rohit desperate for the single to retain the strike and get to his half-century, tucks the ball towards midwicket and scrambles through End of over 92 (3 runs) India 419/9 RG Sharma 50* (56b 4x4 1x6) S Shillingford 36-5-146-5 Mohammed Shami 0* (2b) ST Gabriel 15-0-82-1
FischerTal Posted November 16, 2013 Posted November 16, 2013 Always knew rohit would do well in tests Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now