The new T20 generation

[express bowling]

The new generation of players, who are developing as cricketers after T20s have become popular , bat at a much higher strike rate on an average.

 

Sarfraz Khan showed it today with his 35  n.o off 10 deliveries with SR of 350 .

 

Guys like Pandya, Iyer, Bista,  Hooda, Pant, Kishan,  etc. would all fall into this category.

 

We need  more such players in our LOI teams as and when they become ready for international cricket.

 

LOIs have changed in the last 3 years and have become a much more high SR game...we need to adapt to that.

Edited April 12, 2016 by express bowling

[vayuu1]

You  don't need all hacks not a good thing, 

A mix of Sarfaraz, hooda,pandya, iyer,sky, nair,jadhav will be very good 

[Autonomous]

why dont you guys borrow Afridi

[gattaca]

24 minutes ago, Autonomous said:

why dont you guys borrow Afridi

we dont have Big Hearts disease.

[Autonomous]

44 minutes ago, gattaca said:

we dont have Big Hearts disease.

its ok u will get it when u have lala. He only give false hopes of winning matches so ultimately your heart gets big and big by watching team loose

[Ankit_sharma03]

2 hours ago, Autonomous said:

why dont you guys borrow Afridi

even afghansitan n zimbabwe wud turn down this offer

[maniac]

Sarfaraz is good for t20s but have to see him play a mature innings yet like say come in at 20/4 or something and stabilize the team.

 

exciting prospect but doesn't check all boxes yet

Edited April 13, 2016 by maniac

[bulbul]

2 hours ago, maniac said:

Sarfaraz is good for t20s but have to see him play a mature innings yet like say come in at 20/4 or something and stabilize the team.

 

exciting prospect but doesn't check all boxes yet

That will happen only if he plays for SRH 

Edited April 13, 2016 by bulbul

[express bowling]

1 hour ago, maniac said:

Sarfaraz is good for t20s but have to see him play a mature innings yet like say come in at 20/4 or something and stabilize the team.

 

exciting prospect but doesn't check all boxes yet

Sarfraz played a very mature innings in the u19 WC final, when all other wickets fell around him.  Came in at 27 for 3.   Scored 51  off 89 deliveries in a low scoring match and build an innings in a difficult situation in a very critical match.   

 

He played quite a few other 70+ knocks in that tournament.

[Debutant]

4 hours ago, maniac said:

Sarfaraz is good for t20s but have to see him play a mature innings yet like say come in at 20/4 or something and stabilize the team.

 

exciting prospect but doesn't check all boxes yet

He played a lot of innings like that in under 19 team. You would know if you watch proper cricket instead of that pathetic excuse of a team called SRH

[Autonomous]

15 hours ago, Viper said:

 please yaarrr maat kar ise

 

Lala is busy running on the beach.. Let him enjoy

Lala busy running on beach to arshi khan house. But still he say he available to play so why no play from india if india looking for a player. Also he got alot of love from there. I have another solution, india should hire him as coach and he will give u all bang bang boom boom players eating bubble gum

11 hours ago, bulbul said:

That will happen only if he plays for SRH 

or if he plays for pakistan

[chewy]

Quote

Guys like Pandya, Iyer, Bista,  Hooda, Pant, Kishan,  etc. would all fall into this category.

 

First let see how these guys go in India A tours to Aus, SA and Eng. 

[express bowling]

12 hours ago, chewy said:

 

First let see how these guys go in India A tours to Aus, SA and Eng. 

 

On 4/12/2016 at 0:11 AM, vayuu1 said:

You  don't need all hacks not a good thing, 

A mix of Sarfaraz, hooda,pandya, iyer,sky, nair,jadhav will be very good 

I am not asking for the inclusion of  particular player in our LOI teams.  The list was just an example of a few new-age players who usually bat at a very high SR.

 

While choosing top order batters, say those who may come in at no.1 to no. 4, we have to look for proper batsmen .....those who are decent against pace, bounce, swing, seam and  spin.  High SR is an additional criteria to suit the modern LOI game. 

 

While choosing batsmen no. 6 to no.7 or 8...maybe even no.5 in T20is...we have to look at real big hitters ( who can hit pacers too ) and bat at very high SR.

 

Out current team has many hacks like Raina, Dhawan etc.  Yuvi is not the player he once was.  New batters are needed in these slots. I would like them to be new-age, high SR batters, whoever they maybe.

Edited April 20, 2016 by express bowling

[Chandan]

On 4/20/2016 at 1:21 PM, express bowling said:

 

I am not asking for the inclusion of  particular player in our LOI teams.  The list was just an example of a few new-age players who usually bat at a very high SR.

 

While choosing top order batters, say those who may come in at no.1 to no. 4, we have to look for proper batsmen .....those who are decent against pace, bounce, swing, seam and  spin.  High SR is an additional criteria to suit the modern LOI game. 

 

While choosing batsmen no. 6 to no.7 or 8...maybe even no.5 in T20is...we have to look at real big hitters ( who can hit pacers too ) and bat at very high SR.

 

Out current team has many hacks like Raina, Dhawan etc.  Yuvi is not the player he once was.  New batters are needed in these slots. I would like them to be new-age, high SR batters, whoever they maybe.

Thats fine. But they need to prove themselves in A cricket first. U 19 is boys cricket and IPL is domestic cricket which can only show the potential, at the most. Hardik was a big failure as an all rounder whereas he was a big hit in IPL last year. So they need to prove in A  tours before considered for team India, whatever format. That should be the correct strategy.

[rkt.india]

4 hours ago, Chandan said:

Thats fine. But they need to prove themselves in A cricket first. U 19 is boys cricket and IPL is domestic cricket which can only show the potential, at the most. Hardik was a big failure as an all rounder whereas he was a big hit in IPL last year. So they need to prove in A  tours before considered for team India, whatever format. That should be the correct strategy.

Hardik wasn't a failure at all. His bowling was always below average. He played two really crucial cameos for us, one against SL and one against BD in Asia cup.

[Ankit_sharma03]

17 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Hardik wasn't a failure at all. His bowling was always below average. He played two really crucial cameos for us, one against SL and one against BD in Asia cup.

Yes he wasnt a failure

n still had few gud bowling perfomances 3/8 against pak isnt bad , wkts were of tail or watever. 

On indian wkts u wnt a seaming all rounder of his type do excedinlgy well, dnt put him in Flintoff, moriss category they are tall and ball 145-150. Even stokes got carted around i dnt see Eng ppl going after him

PPl going after pandya , just wanna ask one thing to them.

So Pandya who has just played one season of domestic n one season IPl plays 2 cameos and at 7 u cnt do more than that and few decent bowling perfomances. 

Bowling- 3/8 (pak),2/26 sri lanka, 2/29(bang), 2/36(aus). N in few games his one over spoiled his figures and in t20 we have forgteen bowler will get hit.

So basically he has 3-4 decent perfomances post aus tour

 

Now count to No of perfomances of dhawan, raina, rahana, rohit and mind u these guys have played Yrs of International n domestic cricket. ull Find 2-3 perfomances max of each guy. 

 

But yet we are after a guy who is still learning, has a huge lack of exp . He will make mistakes n thats when he ll learn. Let him make his mistakes. 

If we have to have a go at someone go on guys like raina, dhawan, rohit, rahane, jadeja who after all these yr of exp failed to deilver and specially as senior players. Dnt go one someone new . 

[Chandan]

3 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

 

But yet we are after a guy who is still learning, has a huge lack of exp . He will make mistakes n thats when he ll learn. Let him make his mistakes. 

If we have to have a go at someone go on guys like raina, dhawan, rohit, rahane, jadeja who after all these yr of exp failed to deilver and specially as senior players. Dnt go one someone new . 

This is the mindset I'm against. I want players matured to come in Indian team. In my earlier post too, I was talking about selection policy, not any plsayer in specific. International cricket is not a place to learn your cricket. You should learn it in domestic cricket and then at A level. When you are selected for India, you should be a finished product or nearly a finished product. That was my opinion. 

[Ankit_sharma03]

2 minutes ago, Chandan said:

This is the mindset I'm against. I want players matured to come in Indian team. In my earlier post too, I was talking about selection policy, not any plsayer in specific. International cricket is not a place to learn your cricket. You should learn it in domestic cricket and then at A level. When you are selected for India, you should be a finished product or nearly a finished product. That was my opinion. 

Fair enough i completely agree that player shud come in team when fully matured n pandya does look far away from maturity

but his case is also diff

We dnt have a seaming all rounder others one r binny n dhawan

he does crank up till 140 another rarity

A bloody gud fielder

Can hit long n we need a lower order hitter. 

 

So he is kind off need , unfortunately we dnt have groomed watson morris flintoff n all 

[rkt.india]

11 hours ago, Chandan said:

This is the mindset I'm against. I want players matured to come in Indian team. In my earlier post too, I was talking about selection policy, not any plsayer in specific. International cricket is not a place to learn your cricket. You should learn it in domestic cricket and then at A level. When you are selected for India, you should be a finished product or nearly a finished product. That was my opinion. 

You wont really get readymade International class players. Even Kohli took 2 years before he started doing, was dropped after 15 games.

[Chandan]

12 hours ago, rkt.india said:

You wont really get readymade International class players. Even Kohli took 2 years before he started doing, was dropped after 15 games.

Few things are called evoving as a batsman, bowler, keeper. Means everything in the basics is intact and with a bit of proper direction, they evolve. Unfortunely, no one has as a seamer in my life time bar Zaheer to some extent. Otherwise everyone, Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman, Sachin, Sehwag evolved and now Kohli, Rahane. I have some doubts for Pujara. Hope he proves me wrong this season.

 

But as for Hardik, even his basics for international cricketer is not intact.

Edited April 29, 2016 by Chandan