Pujara's malaise, Rahul's ton puts India in awkward spot

[rkt.india]

Quote

 

A sashay down the pitch, a free swing of the arms, and KL Rahul had gone from 96 to 102. It was his third Test hundred, and he had taken 182 balls to get there.

 

At the other end, Cheteshwar Pujara was batting on 28 off 106 balls. His strike rate was 26.41. Rahul's was 56.04.

 

If you had just arrived at the ground, or had just switched on your televisions, it might have seemed like two top-order batsmen adopting contrasting methods against the same bowling attack, in the same conditions. That wasn't quite the case.

 

At the start of day two, Rahul had been batting on 75 off 114 balls, and Pujara on 18 off 57. When he reached his hundred, Rahul had added 27 to his overnight score in 68 balls, and Pujara, in that time had made 10 off 49. India had scored 45 in 19 overs, at a run rate of 2.36.

 

On a pitch still offering bounce and seam movement, West Indies' quicks had bowled with discipline, holding a fifth-stump line, trying to draw the batsmen into indiscretion. Neither batsman had obliged. Of the 84 balls that Shannon Gabriel, Jason Holder and Miguel Cummins had sent down in the morning, till that point, Rahul and Pujara had left 38 and defended 29.

 

Against the fast bowlers, Rahul had been just as watchful as Pujara. Ten of the 27 runs he had scored had come off two strokes; the six that brought up his hundred and a swept four, both off the offspinner Roston Chase. Take out those two shots, and Rahul's strike rate for the day was 25.00, hardly different to Pujara's 20.41.

 

Both batsmen were playing exactly as the situation demanded. It was hard-nosed Test cricket.

 

West Indies had been shot out for 196, and had ended day one with India one down and 70 behind. They had bowled poorly on the first afternoon, the fast bowlers sending down half-volleys and the spinners, particularly Devendra Bishoo, routinely dropping short. Rahul had taken full toll, with languid drives, deft clips off his toes and dismissive pulls, and scored his runs at a strike rate of just over 65.

 

West Indies must have resolved to bowl with far more discipline on the second morning, use whatever help the pitch still gave them, and hoped they could get a wicket or two early to put India under some sort of pressure. Given the quality of bowlers at their disposal, they perhaps did not feel confident enough to bowl a more attacking line. And so the fifth-stump line, and the hope of inducing errors.

 

India were determined not to make those errors. Followers of Indian cricket may have become used to self-denial from Pujara, the refusal to be drawn into looseness outside off stump. Rahul they knew less about. This was only his sixth Test. He had scored freely on the first day, but had been allowed to do so to a large extent. Now the bowling was better, and he was showing he could handle that as well.

 

The day began with Holder bowling to Rahul and Gabriel to Pujara. Holder bowled three successive maidens as Pujara played the second line expertly. When the line was wide outside off stump, he could leave comfortably, but when it was closer, he waited until the last possible moment, eyes locked on the ball's trajectory, before deciding whether to leave or defend. It took him until the last ball of the first hour, in the first over of spin, to score his first runs of the morning.

 

Gabriel, quicker and more aggressive, posed a more direct threat, getting some balls to straighten off the pitch and others to climb awkwardly. Rahul weaved away nimbly from the short ones, got on top of the bounce when he could, and by and large left comfortably outside off stump.

 

He had a couple of edgy moments, playing and missing when he tried to cut one too close to his body, and then again while defending a legcutter off the front foot. But he made sure his hands didn't jab at the ball, and ensured it kept a safe distance from his edge.

 

Cummins, the debutant, came on after the drinks break, and tested Pujara, beating both his edges with seam movement and getting a shortish ball to rear at him and hit his glove. Pujara handled this as well as he possibly could, his top hand snug against his chest at the point of impact and his bottom hand off the handle, and the ball fell harmlessly by his side.

 

There was still life in the pitch, but there was nothing to show for it on the scorecard. West Indies had bowled poorly on the first day and taken just one wicket; they had bowled much better now and taken no wickets.

 

As the partnership moved towards lunch and then past it, the runs flowed a little easier. Pujara drove Cummins and Gabriel to the straight boundary, and in between slapped Cummins through cover point. Rahul stepped out to Bishoo and lofted him over extra-cover, achieving a full, fluid extension of his arms.

 

Then, a boundary short of a half-century, Pujara made a fatal misjudgment. A shortish ball at his hips, tucked into the leg side. Perhaps the ball came on slower than expected, and went squarer than he intended, reducing the distance Chase had to cover to his right from midwicket. Chase ran, picked up, spun around, and threw down the stumps at the bowler's end. A beautiful moment of athletic poise. Pujara, sprawled flat on the ground, knew he was out. He picked himself up, his shirt streaked with dirt, and trudged back.

 

He had made 21, 31, 14, 28, 16 and 46 in his last six Test innings.

 

Shrugging off a brief attack of cramps, Rahul moved to a career-best 158 before he fell in the fifth over after tea. This was some effort. Five of his six Tests had come because of injury to one of India's settled openers. He had scored three hundreds in those six Tests. With this latest performance, he had made himself extremely hard to leave out.

 

When Vijay, one of India's most consistent Test performers in the last two-and-a-half years, recovers from the thumb injury that has kept him out of this game, India will have a hard decision to make. Rahul has just scored a hundred. Shikhar Dhawan made 84 important runs in Antigua. Pujara's recent scores do not leap off the page. Since scoring anunbeaten 145 against Sri Lanka last year and starting the home series against South Africa with 77 in a low-scoring Test in Mohali, he has made a string of in-between scores.

 

In Antigua, he steered India past the early loss of Vijay, saw off a testing spell from Gabriel, and took India to lunch with no further loss of wickets, but had only made 16 when he got himself out to a miscued pull. Now, again, he had got himself out after doing the hard work.

 

If there's one single, unified cause for Pujara's recent run, it's hard to identify. But something isn't quite right. Rahul has three hundreds and no fifties in six Tests. Pujara once had a similar record. After the first Test of India's 2013-14 tour of South Africa, he had scored seven hundreds and only two fifties, in 16 Tests.

 

Since then, he has made one hundred, four fifties, and 15 scores between 20 and 49. His failure rate is still quite low - he has only been out 11 times for single-digit scores in 58 Test innings - but has not been converting his starts for a while. Something has changed, and it has been a while since Pujara last looked like the big-hundred machine he was in his first few seasons.

 

If India leave out Pujara when Vijay returns and play Rahul at No. 3, they will not quite get a like-for-like replacement. Rahul has shown a great ability to convert his starts, but he has also shown he can be vulnerable early on, and has been out six times for single-digit scores in just eleven Test innings. Rahul brims with talent, but still has to show he isn't a hundred-or-nothing batsman.

 

How will India line up when Vijay returns to full fitness? Will they back Pujara to find a solution for his curious malaise? Will they play Rahul, perhaps out of position, and back him to show he has tightened his early-innings game? Or will they leave out Dhawan or even, unlikely as it seems, Vijay? No matter which way they go, they will have made a difficult decision.

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/west-indies-v-india-2016/content/story/1041165.html

[rkt.india]

This article shows why Pujara is so important for this team.

[zen]

I actually liked how Pujara left the balls. It was classic test match batting signalling to the bowlers that they have to do much better to get him out .... and ironically, it was Pujara that got himself out 

 

Better luck next time!

[Bleed-Blue]

Its pretty obvious what you do imo you have to drop Dhawan for Vijay, Pujara is way better and more important member of the team.

 

 

Edited August 1, 2016 by Bleed-Blue

[Lannister]

When Kohli was at the other end Rahul was striking at pretty reasonable run-rate. The way Pujara has batted was just too negative considering the position India were in. I think he has very limited stroke play, hence his inability to shift gears when required. Why don't we just open with Pujara and Vijay, while Rahul coming in at 3. 

[Bigg Brother]

Looks like Pujara is playing for place now-a-days..Unfortunately Rohit hasnt even that patience to play for the place.

[sarcastic]

5 hours ago, Bigg Brother said:

Looks like Pujara is playing for place now-a-days..Unfortunately Rohit hasnt even that patience to play for the place.

May be...> But what about Rohit Sharma. What should he do to get into the playing XI... He will be carrying water no matter what the batsmen seem to do.

[sarcastic]

5 hours ago, Bigg Brother said:

Looks like Pujara is playing for place now-a-days..Unfortunately Rohit hasnt even that patience to play for the place.

May be...> But what about Rohit Sharma. What should he do to get into the playing XI... He will be carrying water no matter what the batsmen seem to do.

[Bigg Brother]

May be...> But what about Rohit Sharma. What should he do to get into the playing XI... He will be carrying water no matter what the batsmen seem to do.

He is not good enough to play at 3...Should wait till Kohli plays with 7 batsmen.

[SLICKR392]

9 hours ago, rett said:

I actually liked how Pujara left the balls. It was classic test match batting signalling to the bowlers that they have to do much better to get him out .... and ironically, it was Pujara that got himself out 

 

Better luck next time!

I heard Viv saying that most batsmen would have fished those balls outside off that Pujara left. Even Rahul found it hard and Kohli took his time as well. My only issue with Pujara is him not making up for these starts, the strike rate is not an issue whatsoever. Has mostly done us good than bad. 

[SLICKR392]

8 hours ago, Lannister said:

When Kohli was at the other end Rahul was striking at pretty reasonable run-rate. The way Pujara has batted was just too negative considering the position India were in. I think he has very limited stroke play, hence his inability to shift gears when required. Why don't we just open with Pujara and Vijay, while Rahul coming in at 3. 

It's easy for us to say. The Windies were bowling extremely well in the morning. Positive is not smashing the ball to the boundary every over. Pujara should have rotated the strike more often, but if that helps him find form, it's all jolly as the scenario wasn't a bad one for India as well. 

[zen]

16 minutes ago, SLICKR392 said:

I heard Viv saying that most batsmen would have fished those balls outside off that Pujara left. Even Rahul found it hard and Kohli took his time as well. My only issue with Pujara is him not making up for these starts, the strike rate is not an issue whatsoever. Has mostly done us good than bad. 

He has played some big knocks so hopefully it is a matter of time before he will get a big knock

 

If Sehwag had left say 10% to 15%  of the balls that he fished for, he may have had a 60+ test avg

 

The ability to leave the ball is an art. And it is good to see that in test matches 

Edited August 1, 2016 by rett

[Mosher]

As much as I get bored with Pujara's batting, we need someone like him to grind it out and hold one end up. Pujara is very much needed on spinning pitches/tougher batting conditions. He used bat at a decent strike rate before, he just needs to work on rotating the strike. He has loads of patience but is currently running low on confidence. Rahul is batting really well and is too good to be ignored and should open the batting with Vijay.

[maniac]

Just now, rett said:

He has played some big knocks so hopefully it is a matter of time that he will get a big knock

 

If Sehwag had left 10% to 15%  of the balls that he fished, he may have had a 60+ test avg

 

The ability to leave the ball is an art. And it is good to see that in test matches 

Yes agree with all of the above.....Defense is as important as having all strokes in the book... Sehwag,Mccullum,Gilchrist and  Gayle are some of the most successful attacking batsman in tests because they all have a compact defense along with attacking stroke play.....This is why likes of Umar Akmal,Maxwell,Pollard,Afridi will never make it at tests because for all the flashy strokeplay they have no defense.

 

Now the other extreme,Likes of Akash Chopra,Hashan Tilakaratne etc were very effective for what it's worth but a Rahul Dravid had a stellar career because he had good attacking strokeplay in his arsenal too.

 

Pujara is better than Akash Chopra,Tilakaratne because he can play attacking shots especially against spinners but right now he is venturing into their territory.

 

Aussies dumped Chris Rogers and Simon Katich because of their strike rates.

 

S/R of 45-50 is acceptable....S/R of 22-28 is not

[adi B]

Pujara and vijay have very important role in the test team as they are the only 2 batsmen who can grind it out when the conditions are super tough .they were thr ones who applied themselves far better than anyone on the mohali and Nagpur raging turners last year ,cant see Kohli,rahane,dhawan,maggi,rahul etc play those type of gritty knocks on green tops or raging turners

[gakgupta]

13 hours ago, maniac said:

Yes agree with all of the above.....Defense is as important as having all strokes in the book... Sehwag,Mccullum,Gilchrist and  Gayle are some of the most successful attacking batsman in tests because they all have a compact defense along with attacking stroke play.....This is why likes of Umar Akmal,Maxwell,Pollard,Afridi will never make it at tests because for all the flashy strokeplay they have no defense.

 

Now the other extreme,Likes of Akash Chopra,Hashan Tilakaratne etc were very effective for what it's worth but a Rahul Dravid had a stellar career because he had good attacking strokeplay in his arsenal too.

 

Pujara is better than Akash Chopra,Tilakaratne because he can play attacking shots especially against spinners but right now he is venturing into their territory.

 

Aussies dumped Chris Rogers and Simon Katich because of their strike rates.

 

S/R of 45-50 is acceptable....S/R of 22-28 is not

I liked your analysis....Esp the part which talks about akash chopra and Hashan.....

 

But Pujara is really really good test batsmen....just going thru the bad phase.....

 

Sometimes, because of pace bowlers (real pace), bowler at the other end gets benefits.....Similarly, because of batsmen like pujara, batsmen at other end gets benefited......

Bowlers will be so frustrated and tired that they will be sending half trackers and half volleys......and batsmen at other end can cash in....

 

I hope kohli doesn't make the mistake of dropping him....Ibfact, he should give him absolute confidence that he will not be dropped, no matter what,.........because, right now, pujara is playing for his place....