Jump to content

Ind/Pak Tribunal Hearing - Pak Claiming $70 Million in damages


Kothili

Recommended Posts

Ehsan Mani said, ""When politicians talk, we shouldn't get it into it. We should focus on matters concerning the cricket boards. When the Kargil incident happened [in 1999], even then we didn't stop dialogues. We knew cricket was tough, but every effort was made to renew bilateral ties. I strongly believe politics and politicians shouldn't influence cricket."

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/24773458/pcb-chairman-committed-talks-bcci-ahead-icc-tribunal

 

 

Has this clown lost his marbles? Why would you want to have any ties sporting/non sporting when nations were at war!

 

 

Link to comment

must be as ruthless as possible in dealing with these terrorist supporting nation  fellows. On one side keeping on creating trouble  in the form of terrorism & other atrocities in border areas especially Kashmir and on the other side, asking shamelessly to play cricket with them

so that they can earn lots of money and create that much more  terrorism with that money.And them dismissing such acts as just  matters of political  differences!!!!!. These oppertunist morons should be treated with utter contempt

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Kothili said:

Ehsan Mani said, ""When politicians talk, we shouldn't get it into it. We should focus on matters concerning the cricket boards. When the Kargil incident happened [in 1999], even then we didn't stop dialogues. We knew cricket was tough, but every effort was made to renew bilateral ties. I strongly believe politics and politicians shouldn't influence cricket."

 

http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/24773458/pcb-chairman-committed-talks-bcci-ahead-icc-tribunal

 

 

Has this clown lost his marbles? Why would you want to have any ties sporting/non sporting when nations were at war!

 

 

 

They elected their favorite cricketer as their prime minister. But righhhhhht. Cricket and sports don't mix. 

Edited by kosingh
Link to comment

There's one caveat to keep in mind here - the Giles Clarke faction that currently controls the ICC has backed BCCI into a corner by accepting a binding arbitration that cannot be appealed.  To create an appearance of fairness, they gave BCCI the option to pick one member of a 3 member committee.  But one will be picked by Pakistan as well.  The deciding 3rd member?  By the ICC.  

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...