Jump to content

Prithvi shaw suspended for doping violation


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

So this means license for KL Rahul to fail in 3 more series. Shaw can only blame himself now.  Test opener spot was up for grabs.  Missed easy runs in home season now.  If BCCI picks guys like Panchal or Abhimanyu they will rack up runs against likes of BD.  Shaw can be way behind the pecking order then. 

why do u assume he ll fail only 

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, zen said:

There should be a handout highlighting which over the counter drugs to avoid. A table should list banned substances in one column, which drugs have them in the 2nd, and the punishment handed out for its use in the 3rd.  Anyone who plays cricket organized by BCCI should have it 

 

 

Im Pretty sure BCCI do that 

Link to comment
49 minutes ago, sarchasm said:

My guess is someone in charge of his fitness/rehabilitation was careless enough to administer a dosage for quicker recovery. Possibly some kind of steroidal substance that's banned.

 

A careless but stupid and costly mistake.

That cannot happen because the threshold level detected in these tests indicate long-time usage.Moreover,look at his hairs -how can a 19 yr old kid get so much hair loss ?

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

why do u assume he ll fail only 

His stats tell us that.In 56 test innings his average is merely 35.27. Also,his strike rate in 23 ODIs is only  79.10  with average of 39.11.Even his overall list A strike rate is just 74 - very low for current ODI standards.

If merit is considered ,he deserves place only in T20.

   
Link to comment
11 minutes ago, vaul said:

That cannot happen because the threshold level detected in these tests indicate long-time usage.Moreover,look at his hairs -how can a 19 yr old kid get so much hair loss ?

Hair-loss is hereditary. I have seen 18 year olds with less hair. And there are plenty of steroid-junky Body builders with full patch of hair.

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, vaul said:

His stats tell us that.In 56 test innings his average is merely 35.27. Also,his strike rate in 23 ODIs is only  79.10  with average of 39.11.Even his overall list A strike rate is just 74 - very low for current ODI standards.

If merit is considered ,he deserves place only in T20.

   

35 is not an avg of failure......its avg perfomance . Lets not forget he has 100 ins aus, eng, WI......that shows he has ability 

again he played most of his ODI cricket in a phase he was struggling...anyone who has seen him play wud not doubt his s/r 

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, test fan said:

Here we can't blame bcci ,it's player own mistake.

there is some thing called man management.Prithvi is still a teenager and hence not that mature. A very good professional sports body  should ensure that  its' players are followed so closely and guided in the right way in such adverse situations.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Cricket_Fan said:

Hair-loss is hereditary. I have seen 18 year olds with less hair. And there are plenty of steroid-junky Body builders with full patch of hair.

Tobacco cause cancer but not all chronic users suffer from the disease.Steroids definitely lead to hair loss but some individuals are more susceptible than others.His father is not yet bald,how come this 19 yr old lost so much of hairs ?

Also, threshold level detected in these tests indicate long-time usage as these tests take care of moderate medicinal dosage.

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

35 is not an avg of failure......its avg perfomance . Lets not forget he has 100 ins aus, eng, WI......that shows he has ability 

again he played most of his ODI cricket in a phase he was struggling...anyone who has seen him play wud not doubt his s/r 

 

Moderate average of 35 in 56 innings is a poor indicator-does not matter where his centuries came.

His s/r in 68 list-A matches is only 74,with average of 37.78. That means those averaging around 50,with s/r near 90, in domestic list -A should be neglected !

He is only successful in t20 where you find easiest of pitches to bat,and he has good range of t20 shots.

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

35 is not an avg of failure......its avg perfomance . Lets not forget he has 100 ins aus, eng, WI......that shows he has ability 

again he played most of his ODI cricket in a phase he was struggling...anyone who has seen him play wud not doubt his s/r 

 

Last 12 tests, average of 22. Lucky he is still getting picked. A LOI legend like Yuvraj got 40 tests, Domestic legend Jaffer got 31 tests, Dhawan has a far better record after 34 tests but is out of the team, Rohit with a better test record is rightly called a failure. 

 

Time me is running out for KL. WI Tests could be make or break for him in his Test career. LOIs no issues.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Lannister said:

So how does it work? Do ICC test players for any consumption before each series? Or is it entirely upto BCCI, in which case I am not sure the system is a genuine one. 

BCCI is an inept organisation especially under current CoA buffoons, but they have an exemplary record of dealing with issues like fixing, age fraud, chucking and doping. I’d always trust them to do the right thing in such cases.

 

Hope Shaw does not get lost to wilderness due to this issue. Will definitely suffer a setback but has age on his side if he wants to make a comeback later.

Link to comment
36 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

35 is not an avg of failure......its avg perfomance . Lets not forget he has 100 ins aus, eng, WI......that shows he has ability 

again he played most of his ODI cricket in a phase he was struggling...anyone who has seen him play wud not doubt his s/r 

 

It's fair enough to say that he has been a utter failure in Shastri's tenure. Clearly he is not the same player he was in 2017 when he scored vital 50's at home vs Aus. WI series should be final chance for him. He has been given way too much longer rope to get his sh** together. 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Link to comment
58 minutes ago, vaul said:

That cannot happen because the threshold level detected in these tests indicate long-time usage.Moreover,look at his hairs -how can a 19 yr old kid get so much hair loss ?

Terbutaline isn't a steroid. It's a medicine for asthma. Anyway, a batsman has no benefits from steroids.

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, ShoonyaSifar said:

Last 12 tests, average of 22. Lucky he is still getting picked. A LOI legend like Yuvraj got 40 tests, Domestic legend Jaffer got 31 tests, Dhawan has a far better record after 34 tests but is out of the team, Rohit with a better test record is rightly called a failure. 

 

Time me is running out for KL. WI Tests could be make or break for him in his Test career. LOIs no issues.

Spot on..  Can't believe people still justify his selection.  He is lucky there was no immediate test series after Aus tour. He'd have been dropped.  That off season has given him a lifeline. 

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Spot on..  Can't believe people still justify his selection.  He is lucky there was no immediate test series after Aus tour. He'd have been dropped.  That off season has given him a lifeline. 

Agreed . Rituraj and others waiting . This ban might be a good thing for shaw . Needs to get fitter and can use the time to get fit 

Link to comment
10 minutes ago, ShoonyaSifar said:

BCCI is an inept organisation especially under current CoA buffoons, but they have an exemplary record of dealing with issues like fixing, age fraud, chucking and doping. I’d always trust them to do the right thing in such cases.

 

Hope Shaw does not get lost to wilderness due to this issue. Will definitely suffer a setback but has age on his side if he wants to make a comeback later.

I am not sure that is the case here. Shaw surely must've known the consequences if BCCI had a strict system in place. At the moment he is out injured, and for some reason they are disclosing this matter very late and coincidentally his suspension period is overlapping with his injury layoff time. Something fishy is going on here and other domestic players have every right to take the matter seriously. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...