randomGuy Posted August 31, 2017 Posted August 31, 2017 (edited) www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiNsXI7zzU4 Edited August 31, 2017 by randomGuy velu 1
Sean Bradley Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. Edited September 1, 2017 by Sean Bradley MechEng and Tibarn 1 1
ravishingravi Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 8 hours ago, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. This is an argument of convenience. I can promise you almost 90 % of all media content should be removed on rational of objectification alone. JaFanatic 1
Temujin Khaghan Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 I dont know about the quality of the ad but these wild stone "Kunal" ads sure hit the target they were aiming... last year it was the FOGG - Bina gas wali Deo... no one even knows why they were supposed to buy a Bina gas wali but there is nothing but an expression of disgust on the actors in that ad and last year they had an epic turnover.
velu Posted September 2, 2017 Author Posted September 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Gollum said: LOL @velu are you as old as Butters? :(
MechEng Posted September 2, 2017 Posted September 2, 2017 20 hours ago, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. Yeah, don't get the point to show themselves as bold and cool in such crass ads.
randomGuy Posted September 3, 2017 Posted September 3, 2017 On 02/09/2017 at 1:51 AM, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. Incorrect argument. 1. It's not objectifying women. 2. It's clearly an ad which would make people buy this deodorant. If sales is the criterion, then this ad is clearly 10/10.
vayuu1 Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 I like Tata sky romantic ad and polo ek ajnabi hasina se Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk
Sean Bradley Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/3/2017 at 11:08 PM, randomGuy said: Incorrect argument. 1. It's not objectifying women. 2. It's clearly an ad which would make people buy this deodorant. If sales is the criterion, then this ad is clearly 10/10. So if the seller is targeting some sex starved tharki buyers, who ll think that they will get laid instantly after buying this deodrant then god bless them, this add and this product is calling it loud, "Cheap", cheap product, cheap ad, cheap models, cheap buyers!
randomGuy Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 16 minutes ago, Sean Bradley said: So if the seller is targeting some sex starved tharki buyers, who ll think that they will get laid instantly after buying this deodrant then god bless them, this add and this product is calling it loud, "Cheap", cheap product, cheap ad, cheap models, cheap buyers! Even if one gets plenty of sex, he/she wants to be desirable in the eyes of opposite sex which makes this ad's appeal universal and not just appealing to 'sex starved tharki buyers' as you claim. velu 1
velu Posted September 5, 2017 Author Posted September 5, 2017 all these self proclaimed feminists should stop watching any of the movies bolly or holly
velu Posted September 5, 2017 Author Posted September 5, 2017 44 minutes ago, Sean Bradley said: So if the seller is targeting some sex starved tharki buyers, who ll think that they will get laid instantly after buying this deodrant then god bless them, this add and this product is calling it loud, "Cheap", cheap product, cheap ad, cheap models, cheap buyers! you shld be in a lalaland if you think people buy products because the ad expose skin .. ads are to there catch peoples attention
velu Posted September 5, 2017 Author Posted September 5, 2017 probably , carls jr should be far bigger than burger king if we apply the logic that tarkis buy based on how much the women is exposed
rkt.india Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 On 9/2/2017 at 1:51 AM, Sean Bradley said: These series of adds are portraying women as objects and directly questions the character of lady who is hitting on her daughters friend, feeding **** in the minds of everyone. who are you to define the character of a lady!
Sean Bradley Posted September 5, 2017 Posted September 5, 2017 Just now, rkt.india said: who are you to define the character of a lady! I am not defining the character but purely speaking up against the kinky message that this add is giving to the masses.
Recommended Posts