Vilander Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 minute ago, Stumped said: They've stated its against the spirit of Ashwin deliberately slowed down in his action so Buttler would leave his crease (which only he knows for sure and clearly wouldn't admit to if he did) and irritatingly that the law is ambiguous rather than clarify their own law. 1 where ? and what is spirit of ashwin...dude this is taking it too far lolz... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suhaan Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, Vilander said: MCC statement. The Marylebone Cricket Club, regarded as the guardian of the laws of the game, sided with Ashwin when it released a statement about the incident on Tuesday. “It has never been in the laws that a warning should be given to the non-striker,” the Lord’s-based MCC said, “and nor is it against the spirit of cricket to run out a non-striker who is seeking to gain an advantage by leaving his/her ground early. “Furthermore, with batsmen now being deemed in or out by millimetres by TV replays on quick singles, it is right that they should remain in their ground at the non-striker’s end until it is fair for them to leave.” https://nationalpost.com/pmn/sports-pmn/mankad-decision-in-ipl-divides-cricket-fans-around-world (duffers dont know diff between rohit and ashwin) Now this is a slap to Goras and our mates(hypocrites) Offcourse our jaahill padosis will surely fail to compile even a word from MCC Zero_Unit, Global.Baba and flamy 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 proper tight slap from MCC lolz.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 11 minutes ago, Stumped said: There is clear ambiguity in the laws as the MCC themselves have acknowledged in their statement. Added to that the statement above that the MCC have sided with Ashwin is false. They've stated its against the spirit if Ashwin deliberately slowed down in his action so Buttler would leave his crease (which only he knows for sure and clearly wouldn't admit to if he did) and irritatingly that the law is ambiguous. They've remained annoyingly neutral on the topic rather than cleaning up their own law. You are correct as: However, on this occasion, MCC stated that the legality of the dismissal came down to the umpire's interpretation of the law, given that Buttler had not been seeking to gain an advantage in the moments before Ashwin chose to abort his delivery stride and attempt the dismissal. "Some feel that Ashwin delayed his action to allow Buttler the chance to leave his ground and that Buttler was in his ground when he expected the ball to be released. If it was a deliberate delay, that would be unfair and against the Spirit of Cricket. Ashwin claims this not to be the case. "The TV umpire had to make a decision and, under the Law (and indeed ICC's interpretation of them, which clarifies the expected moment of release as when the arm reaches its highest point), it was understandable how he opted to give Buttler out." It is an IPL game so they probably just decided to stick with what the umpire went with. RR should push for a hearing on the grounds of deliberate delay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Ashwin for WC, I say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, flamy said: Ashwin for WC, I say No please. Neither he nor Jadeja have proved they deserve a recall to ODIs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 7 minutes ago, Gollum said: No please. Neither he nor Jadeja have proved they deserve a recall to ODIs. Just to be in the squad when we play Ingerland Mind games, non-ipl fan brah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
putrevus Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Stumped said: Because acknowledging you made a mistake and understanding where you went wrong is a good thing to do and if anything I'd have thought someone who had made a mistake such as that in the past would have a greater understanding for the judgment of similar debatable future issues. In regards to walking, every country has numerous players both past and present who have edged a ball and not walked. Are we going to suddenly rule out anyone discussing any matter of morality related to the game based on that? On a separate note though, my bigger issue isn't with the spirit side of things in this incident but the legal side of things. The laws are ambiguous on what the "expected point of release is" and the MCC statement does nothing to clear up that ambiguity which doesn't help. From the interpretation I had of the rules, I viewed it as not out presuming Buttler would likely have been in his crease when Ashwin released the ball during his standard action. If someone had made similar mistake in the past they would understand why Ashwin did it. It was shady but legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 6 hours ago, zen said: could be reviewed by BCCI and/or CoA: ^ As I said, this is not Mankading but Ashwining Look at butlers foot. Nearest to cam is his bat an extention of his left hand then his left foot and then right. Of all this his bat which is nearest to cam is furtherest up and then his left feet followed by right which is grounded that puts his bat well in air then. He is clearly out of the crease and you keep servin self goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilander Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Stumped said: No need to be deliberately facetious, it was a clear spelling mistake with of meant to be if. It's in the exact statement your above article is quoting, they've just selectively removed the parts they don't like : MCC: Some feel that Ashwin delayed his action to allow Buttler the chance to leave his ground and that Buttler was in his ground when he expected the ball to be released. If it was a deliberate delay, that would be unfair and against the Spirit of Cricket. MCC can not comment on some feeling. They can comment on cricket laws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zen Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Vilander said: Look at butlers foot. Nearest to cam is his bat an extention of his left hand then his left foot and then right. Of all this his bat which is nearest to cam is furtherest up and then his left feet followed by right which is grounded that puts his bat well in air then. He is clearly out of the crease and you keep servin self goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
putrevus Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Spirit of the game is a tool which teams try to use it when they are at the receiving end.Every team has done it.Upton was playing victim card which was pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Nice hit and run by KT Switchblade 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Gotta say I appreciate Sangakkara fully taking the bowler's side on this and bringing up batters nicking the ball and not walking when KP was whining about spirit of the game. Stan AF and Gollum 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 LOL what a wife Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollum Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 Sachinism and Gollum 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamy Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, Gollum said: For a change the Indian commentators/experts who we think are servile are standing their ground and making logical points, refuting all the bakwas spouted by goras. A real pity so many Indians on social media are acting like chodus It will take another generation for the colonial hangover to be done. Or maybe two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonix768 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 3 hours ago, nikred said: Is there any other sport with similar example as mankading? The scenario of playing within the rules of the sport but somehow not playing within the spirit of that sport. Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk Underarm service in tennis comes to my mind.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts