Jump to content

Match 55 , CSK vs PKXI @ Chandigarh, 4.00 PM , 5 may 2019


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

They don't need to send him at 3. They are sending him as he is the most aggressive. WHy didn't they send him at no.4 today when even Agarwal can  hunt this target down? Because his strike rate in the last 3 matches is over 177.  Batting at 3 Batting at no4 not much difference? lol Are you serious?  Cricket illiteracy at full display

This is how Punjab bat after the fall of Rahul and Gayle :

 

4 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 w 1 0 1wd 0 6 1

 

Sure they were going for a win in 14.2 overs after Rahul's wicket :giggle:

whose cricket illiteracy at full display here????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pollack said:

This is how Punjab bat after the fall of Rahul and Gayle :

 

4 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 w 1 0 1wd 0 6 1

 

Sure they were going for a win in 14.2 overs after Rahul's wicket :giggle:

whose cricket illiteracy at full display here????

You are a certified idiot. Just because they didn't score it doesn't mean there was on intent. Did you see the sixes from Pooran now? Just because they have intent it doesn't mean it will be easy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

You are a certified idiot. Just because they didn't score it doesn't mean there was on intent. Did you see the sixes from Pooran now? Just because they have intent it doesn't mean it will be easy. 

Abey idiot they were taking singles as shown by me. Why would Pooran not hit sixes they still have to win the game even if not in 14.2 overs. And he anyway is a hitter. After Rahul's and Gayle's wicket they never went for a win in 14.2 overs. But they still have to win the game. If they wanted to win in 14.2 overs after Gayle and Rahul they would have showed lot more intent than taking singles. Just 3 -4 overs were remaining to achieve the target. 

You are definitely idiot here. :facepalm: here is how they approcahed after the fall of Gayle and very sensible tbh.

 

4 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 w 1 0 1wd 0 6 1

Edited by Pollack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...