Jump to content

WC19 | M29 | NZ vs WI | Manchester | June 22nd @ 8.30 AM EST


zen

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, zen said:

WI and SA have a range of 9 points now if they win all the remaining games. The lowest points among the top 4 is 8 by Eng so far .... and Eng has 3 games to go, while others in top 4 have games remaining as well

So technically england has to loose it's remaning games while the other contenders have to win all their games. Interesting

Posted

WI very unlucky but they are not really a team a team but collection of individuals who are better suited for T20s.

 

They just don't have the patience when it comes to batting to play and assess the requirements of 50 overs. It can't all be bang bang every game. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Zero_Unit said:

So technically england has to loose it's remaning games while the other contenders have to win all their games. Interesting

also Ban, SL, and Pak would not need to go over 9 (at 9 will compete on NRR)

Posted
1 minute ago, I6MTW said:

For those who said this is the most boring world cup. Well this match is for those! 

This WC is already better than the 07 and 15 one's and a couple of more good matches it'll be better than the 2011 one.

Doesn't change the fact that 3 teams will be gone by tomorrow and another one on Wednesday if Pak lose which means we will have quite a few dead rubbers in hand.

Posted
1 minute ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Among all this Lets not forget boult for taking that great catch .......nerves do come in at this time but he held it and maintained his balance

It was pretty easy catch tbh

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Under pressure even dollies get dropped and maintaining balance after taking the catch never easy 

NZ are one of the coolest teams so they usually don't get the nerve

Posted
Just now, Ankit_sharma03 said:

Aus has bigger grounds and thats where they tend to struggle but still one of Fav 

Yeah but for T20s they generally pull in the boundary ropes. 

Posted
Just now, Franco Vazquez said:

Doesn't change the fact that 3 teams will be gone by tomorrow and another one on Wednesday if Pak lose which means we will have quite a few dead rubbers in hand.

England still has to beat NZ, Aus, Ind. 

NZ has an even tougher schedule ahead of them now. 

 

Honestly Aus, Nz, Eng,Ind were the only teams that were gonna qualify in the first place. 

 

SA and SL are shadows of their former selves.

WI play ODI as of it was a t20, they lack the temperament and bowling.

Ban are improving but with their bowling lineup it was always going to be difficult for them to qualify on Eng pitches.

Pak are very inconsistent and lack the quality. So they are irrelevant despite it being played in England.

 

 

Posted
Just now, I6MTW said:

England still has to beat NZ, Aus, Ind. 

NZ has an even tougher schedule ahead of them now. 

 

Honestly Aus, Nz, Eng,Ind were the only teams that were gonna qualify in the first place. 

 

SA and SL are shadows of their former selves.

WI play ODI as of it was a t20, they lack the temperament and bowling.

Ban are improving but with their bowling lineup it was always going to be difficult for them to qualify on Eng pitches.

Pak are very inconsistent and lack the quality. So they are irrelevant despite it being played in England.

 

 

NZ, Australia and India are already in SFs even though its not official. They would need something drastic to happen to not qualify whereas WI and Afghanistan are already out.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Franco Vazquez said:

NZ, Australia and India are already in SFs even though its not official. They would need something drastic to happen to not qualify whereas WI and Afghanistan are already out.

SA, WI, and Afghanistan are for all practical purposes out of this WC. SL and Ban stand an outside chance.

Pakistan has a very minute chance. Need a lot going their way.

Edited by I6MTW
Posted
Just now, I6MTW said:

SA, WI, and Afghanistan are for all practical purposes out of this WC.

Then why waste peoples time. Just go ahead with 6 teams? and what is the difference between them and Associates then? They all lose matches

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...