Jump to content

Any self respecting team would sack these two players for this display


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

this is a pitch where you need 337. they have to overcompensate for weak middle order. even a run a ball is not good enough 

So the players above them have to overcompensate for these jokers down the order. Why would the want to do it ?? Tell me again why are they in the team if you want people to overcompensate for your incompetence. Ur defending the indefensible.

Posted
Just now, gooner said:

So the players above them have to overcompensate for these jokers down the order. Why would the want to do it ?? Tell me again why are they in the team if you want people to overcompensate for your incompetence. Ur defending the indefensible.

27 runs in the first 10 overs while chasing 337. are u really defending that? 

Posted

Jadhav, Rahul Complete jokers. Also, wtf was that from Rohit. Getting relaxed after 100 and got out. A quick fire 30 would have helped. Kohli seems to play rank bad shots to get out in 50’s 60’s..A 100 was there for the taking and he lost it. Pandya tried as did Pant but it was all too much in the end. We are playing with 4 batsmen of intent and 1-2 bowlers who keep calm in important matches.

 

Dhoni..the less said the better. His keeping standards have dropped and his batting is borderline selfish and gaddar.We are really missing Dhawan. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

people don't understand that. just wanna blame the two guys on bottom who have 4 bowlers who can't hit a single boundary coming in after them

Then there is something wrong with the team if you give up at 5 down. No team including Afghan and Srilanka does that. 

Posted
Just now, maniac said:

Then there is something wrong with the team if you give up at 5 down. No team including Afghan and Srilanka does that. 

its well known that our middle order sucks. this has been persistent ever since Yuvi left. keep pant in now. he's your only hope 

Posted
16 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

so if dhoni or jadhav gets out, you expect bowlers to take you home to 337. 

Jadhav and Dhoni are proper batsmen. They are expected to go for the win.  Playing for run rate is bullshit. India isn't going to finish at 1st place if we were going to lose this match. 2nd or 3rd position doesn't matter. You get the same opposition.

Posted
2 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

27 runs in the first 10 overs while chasing 337. are u really defending that? 

Because the opening was a platform that gave us a shot, if you think we are justified to shut shop at 5 down, imagine if Kohli and Rohit got out  in the first 10.

 

chalo, let’s say we were 80/2 or even 100/3 in the first 10-15, how much could we have got with our team you think?

Posted
4 minutes ago, The Dark Horse said:

That's all right but we knew the target..they had got out trying to accelerate...on the other hand we didn't even try after Pandya got out.

 

they tried .. but england bowled well too 

they bowled only slow balls 

Posted
2 minutes ago, FischerTal said:

27 runs in the first 10 overs while chasing 337. are u really defending that? 

Iam still fuming about the Rohit dismissal after his 100 he compensated his strike rate. And put us 25 runs behind England at that point of time. If he had stayed for another 5 overa the game could have been different. And he went for the win no matter what. The same cannot be said about dhonis cowardly plodding approach. Iam sir you can see the Reason.

Posted
1 minute ago, Pollack said:

Jadhav and Dhoni are proper batsmen. They are expected to go for the win.  Playing for run rate is bullshit. India isn't going to finish at 1st place if we were going to lose this match. 2nd or 3rd position doesn't matter. You get the same opposition.

so if in 46th over one of the two gets out, is there any realistic chance for us to get to 337 with chahal Yadav shami and bumrah?

Posted
1 minute ago, FischerTal said:

its well known that our middle order sucks. this has been persistent ever since Yuvi left. keep pant in now. he's your only hope 

So we deliberately lose each match after being 5 down. Got it. Losing  deliberately without trying is minor 

Posted
1 minute ago, maniac said:

Because the opening was a platform that gave us a shot, if you think we are justified to shut shop at 5 down, imagine if Kohli and Rohit got out  in the first 10.

 

chalo, let’s say we were 80/2 or even 100/3 in the first 10-15, how much could we have got with our team you think?

not that much. we are a top heavy team with pandya in middle order to rely on. this is well known. dhawan is worth 2 batsmen in this squad

Posted
Just now, FischerTal said:

so if in 46th over one of the two gets out, is there any realistic chance for us to get to 337 with chahal Yadav shami and bumrah?

There is a chance to lose so instead you deliberately lose the match. That's your point right?

Posted
4 minutes ago, The Dark Horse said:

That's all right but we knew the target..they had got out trying to accelerate...on the other hand we didn't even try after Pandya got out.

14 an over was needed when pandya gir out. 72 in 5.1 overs. Yes you can blame them but they aren't the only one to be blamed. Imagine even 47 instead of 27 in first 10. Then equation could have been 52 in 5.1 overs, much easier. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

Needed 189 in last 20 that was a bit too much. We were 140/1 in 30 overs chasing 338, less 5 rpo.

We also needed 100 odd from last 10 with 6 wickets in hand

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...