Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 9 minutes ago, putrevus said: The big joke was Ganguly who in order to save his place in the test team pushed Yuvraj to open or even Parthiv Patel to open the innings. Wrong , Please get ur facts right ganguly place was perfectly secure and he wanted to get yuvraj in somehow......yuvraj who at that time only made runs in 1 -2 innings out 10 didnt have a secure place. Ganguly idea came due to success of sehwag experiment . His place was secure specially not threatened by a guy who didnt do much by then Parthiv opened coz ganguly had to come back in as permanent captain, permanent captain cant be dropped and he wanted to persist with yuvi as well . Those 2 was no were close to threat a permanent captain place at that time These incidence are from 2004, ganguly avg previous yr was brilliant 65 and next year 43......why wud a player with that numbers be threatened he gave his spot to sehwag n then dhoni
putrevus Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 15 minutes ago, New guy said: Dude at this point I think you are being paid money by kohlis PR to shill. There is no other explanation. Dude if you nothing to add don't reply to the post.I don't care what you think. My views are based on cricket played by Indian team under each captain.Your views may differ if so reply with them.
putrevus Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 11 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Wrong , Please get ur facts right ganguly place was perfectly secure and he wanted to get yuvraj in somehow......yuvraj who at that time only made runs in 1 -2 innings out 10 didnt have a secure place. Ganguly idea came due to success of sehwag experiment . His place was secure specially not threatened by a guy who didnt do much by then Parthiv opened coz ganguly had to come back in as permanent captain, permanent captain cant be dropped and he wanted to persist with yuvi as well . Those 2 was no were close to threat a permanent captain place at that time These incidence are from 2004, ganguly avg previous yr was brilliant 65 and next year 43......why wud a player with that numbers be threatened he gave his spot to sehwag n then dhoni Ganguly was injured for first two tests in Pakistan 2004 and to play third test , he made Parthiv Patel open to get himself into the team ( I am not blaming him) .He could not kick Yuvraj out because Yuvraj had scored a 100 in second test which they lost in the middle order. Ganguly is most overated captain, who won nothing even though he had greatest batting talent in their prime. His handling of fast bowlers was atrocious. Irony is his team reaching finals in CT 2001 in Kenya is hailed as great achievement but CT 2017 is seen a big failure.Both times India should have beaten opponents as they were favorites in both matches. You need a captain who raises his performance and leads from the front does not hide behind other players. Peshust 1
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 (edited) 33 minutes ago, putrevus said: Ganguly was injured for first two tests in Pakistan 2004 and to play third test , he made Parthiv Patel open to get himself into the team ( I am not blaming him) .He could not kick Yuvraj out because Yuvraj had scored a 100 in second test which they lost in the middle order. So how does that make his place under question if he was injured ? Quote Ganguly is most overated captain, who won nothing even though he had greatest batting talent in their prime. His handling of fast bowlers was atrocious. With that team he punched above their weight In that era coming 2nd to aus was an achievement coz that aussie side was unbeatable . Drawing against that aussie side in their den was no less achievement then winning specially with kumble as one bowler only.... No one was giving us a chance in 2003 WC after an horrendous NZ tour U cannot compare wins of then to now Aus, SA , WI, PAk, SL are not same anymore. To be honest only Sa n ENG were good at home n they gave us whacking so question goes on kohli as well. Fitness of our players were not same Challenges are not same anymore Quote Irony is his team reaching finals in CT 2001 in Kenya is hailed as great achievement but CT 2017 is seen a big failure.Both times India should have beaten opponents as they were favorites in both matches. Coz Nz was a better side then our team then and pak was much worse side then us in 2017 In 2000 no one expected us to be in final in 2017 we were fav Hence the diff......underperforming n overachieving Quote You need a captain who raises his performance and leads from the front does not hide behind other players. Captaincy is just not about individual perfomance but to get perfomance from team. Many captain in past continued despite their own poor form This is the biggest downfall in kohli capatincy as well.....he alone cant take u to end point. RCB has similar fault in their structure ....to much reliance on few player. Whenever a team wins a tournament its a team game U can keep raising ur perfomance to freak level but if others dnt perfom u will always fall short Take dhoni perfomance in CT 2013, Wc 2011, Wc 2007 t20......was not much but he got the team to perform n hence results. Take IPL - Rohit form has been low in last 2 season yet they have IPL, Chennai was considered an Oldie side they won an IPL , RR 1st season with bunch of young players. Its a team game.....raising ur own perfomance is one box tick not all . Ganguly got the perfomance out of others How many remeber ganguly fighting with selector to take kumble for 2003 tour down under ....which made kumble beats overseas How many remeber ganguly convincing srinath to be back in team for 2003 Wc, but ppl wud remember how well he did in WC How he backed guys likes sehwag yuvi when these guys were failing for long period.....that backing made them what they were If kohli raised his own perfomance, ganguly took it of other players......captaincy isnt about one expect U want me to compare Eye for talent - ganguly had, kohli didnt Having nerves to win tournament- Both didnt Strategically sound- both not much Instinctive calls- ganguly was better Raising own game- hands down kohli backing talent- hands down ganguly Agggresive- ganguly......kohli is one of the most conservative captains Fast bowling- ppl forget ganguly bought zak, nehra, balaji, irfan all under him n backed them in their tough phases. Kohli gave up on kuldeep in a flash . Edited September 26, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03
putrevus Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 53 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: So how does that make his place under question if he was injured ? With that team he punched above their weight In that era coming 2nd to aus was an achievement coz that aussie side was unbeatable . Drawing against that aussie side in their den was no less achievement then winning specially with kumble as one bowler only.... No one was giving us a chance in 2003 WC after an horrendous NZ tour U cannot compare wins of then to now Aus, SA , WI, PAk, SL are not same anymore. To be honest only Sa n ENG were good at home n they gave us whacking so question goes on kohli as well. Fitness of our players were not same Challenges are not same anymore Coz Nz was a better side then our team then and pak was much worse side then us in 2017 In 2000 no one expected us to be in final in 2017 we were fav Hence the diff......underperforming n overachieving Captaincy is just not about individual perfomance but to get perfomance from team. Many captain in past continued despite their own poor form This is the biggest downfall in kohli capatincy as well.....he alone cant take u to end point. RCB has similar fault in their structure ....to much reliance on few player. Whenever a team wins a tournament its a team game U can keep raising ur perfomance to freak level but if others dnt perfom u will always fall short Take dhoni perfomance in CT 2013, Wc 2011, Wc 2007 t20......was not much but he got the team to perform n hence results. Take IPL - Rohit form has been low in last 2 season yet they have IPL, Chennai was considered an Oldie side they won an IPL , RR 1st season with bunch of young players. Its a team game.....raising ur own perfomance is one box tick not all . Ganguly got the perfomance out of others How many remeber ganguly fighting with selector to take kumble for 2003 tour down under ....which made kumble beats overseas How many remeber ganguly convincing srinath to be back in team for 2003 Wc, but ppl wud remember how well he did in WC How he backed guys likes sehwag yuvi when these guys were failing for long period.....that backing made them what they were If kohli raised his own perfomance, ganguly took it of other players......captaincy isnt about one expect U want me to compare Eye for talent - ganguly had, kohli didnt Having nerves to win tournament- Both didnt Strategically sound- both not much Instinctive calls- ganguly was better Raising own game- hands down kohli backing talent- hands down ganguly Agggresive- ganguly......kohli is one of the most conservative captains Fast bowling- ppl forget ganguly bought zak, nehra, balaji, irfan all under him n backed them in their tough phases. Kohli gave up on kuldeep in a flash . Eye for talent - ganguly had, kohli didnt (what great talented blossomed under Kohli) . Other than Sehwag who made his debut in 1998 and score test 100 on debut from middle order so they had to find place for him) This notion that Ganguly developed talent is ridiculous, he was given greatest middle order ever in history of cricket on plater. All fast bowlers who made debut under his watch flamed out except Zaheer khan who blosommed after 2006 Ganguly was gone by then. Kohli has made indian fast bowling by backing them to hilt , he made them part of Indian team even at home, he has developed fast bowling culture.Which Indian teams down the road will also benefit. Having nerves to win tournament- Both didnt Strategically sound- both not much (it is very overrate term) You need good players to win. Instinctive calls- Kohli took more like giving Leg spinner karan Sharma his debut over Ashwin or Kuldeep yadav in Lords test both turned out to be wrong calls but he took the call.He will learn and become better captain from those mistakes. Raising own game- hands down kohli Backing talent- You need talent to be backed. Ganguly had Sehwag and Kohli had Rahul who flopped miserablly. I don't see any talented batsmen in Indian cricket like Sehwag or left handed hitter like Yuvraj who did not get proper backing from Kohli. Agggresive-Kohli hands down, Kohli went with five bowlers even after losing match after match. That takes guts.Ganguly never had those guts even at home.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 8 minutes ago, putrevus said: Eye for talent - ganguly had, kohli didnt (what great talented blossomed under Kohli) . Other than Sehwag who made his debut in 1998 and score test 100 on debut from middle order so they had to find place for him) This notion that Ganguly developed talent is ridiculous, he was given greatest middle order ever in history of cricket on plater. All fast bowlers who made debut under his watch flamed out except Zaheer khan who blosommed after 2006 Ganguly was gone by then. Yuvraj Zak dhoni Bhajji- who was dropped and was bought back by ganguly Laxman- who again was bought back by ganguly since he saw his innings in aus n knew he bats well against Aus 8 minutes ago, putrevus said: Kohli has made indian fast bowling by backing them to hilt , he made them part of Indian team even at home, he has developed fast bowling culture.Which Indian teams down the road will also benefit. Who has he backed ??? Bumrah needed no backing.... Ishant was backed under dhoni Shami backing we saw in WC Umesh was the one where it all started when he gave views in his support n dhoni against. He himself didnt back umesh n umesh hasnt gone anywhere Who else- he has saini, siraj in RCB side yet he cant understand what format they are good at . Siraj kept taking wkts in bundle yet never got a chance in test Kohli fast bowler image is overrated as fck.....just becoz dhoni was poor he has been seen as Messiah which he isnt 8 minutes ago, putrevus said: Instinctive calls- Kohli took more like giving Leg spinner karan Sharma his debut over Ashwin or Kuldeep yadav in Lords test both turned out to be wrong calls but he took the call.He will learn and become better captain from those mistakes. U want me to count how many times ganguly took instinctive calls on using part timer n winning games. Those 2 u mentioned were failed result Sehwag only won us 2 times in colombo Odi from nowere with his bowling 8 minutes ago, putrevus said: Raising own game- hands down kohli Backing talent- You need talent to be backed. Ganguly had Sehwag and Kohli had Rahul who flopped miserablly. U want me to show sehwag n yuvraj stats which was so horrible that kohli wud have dropped. He has backed them when their avg hit below 20 non stop Rahul was dropped in test after being best Indian batsman in Ind-Aus test series Rahul is dropped after being one of the best t20 batsman in side As if sehwag didnt fail, check sehwag odi record one of the most inconsistent batsman ever.....not only ganguly backed him but gave his batting spot 8 minutes ago, putrevus said: I don't see any talented batsmen in Indian cricket like Sehwag or left handed hitter like Yuvraj who did not get proper backing from Kohli. If u see sehwag n yuvi numbers in equal number of games to pant n rahul.....u wont even find the talented 8 minutes ago, putrevus said: Agggresive-Kohli hands down, Kohli went with five bowlers even after losing match after match. That takes guts.Ganguly never had those guts even at home. again a false myth 1st of all its not 5 bowlers but 4 bowler + 1 all rounder which dhoni started in Eng tour with binny Long before dhoni n kohli, dravid did it in 2006 ind-pak series , playing irfan pathan under dravid - it was tough to drop any top batsman Under dhoni - he had low quality binny not pandya Kohli loosing match after match ??? oh u mean england n Sa Well how can u drop Pandya in ENg- he won u a game.....he was as inconsistent as others . He was dropped in last game and we still lost so the reason wasnt pandya In Sa- also he played an excellent knock in 1st test when every batsman was struggling to cross 50 apart from kohli from indian side he made 90+. So how can he be dropped Clearly u dnt understand the concept of backing- backing comes when a player isnt performing for long......everyone gets a decent rope when they face low due to past perfomances. Good captains persist more
putrevus Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: Yuvraj Zak dhoni Bhajji- who was dropped and was bought back by ganguly Laxman- who again was bought back by ganguly since he saw his innings in aus n knew he bats well against Aus Who has he backed ??? Bumrah needed no backing.... Ishant was backed under dhoni Shami backing we saw in WC Umesh was the one where it all started when he gave views in his support n dhoni against. He himself didnt back umesh n umesh hasnt gone anywhere Who else- he has saini, siraj in RCB side yet he cant understand what format they are good at . Siraj kept taking wkts in bundle yet never got a chance in test Kohli fast bowler image is overrated as fck.....just becoz dhoni was poor he has been seen as Messiah which he isnt U want me to count how many times ganguly took instinctive calls on using part timer n winning games. Those 2 u mentioned were failed result Sehwag only won us 2 times in colombo Odi from nowere with his bowling U want me to show sehwag n yuvraj stats which was so horrible that kohli wud have dropped. He has backed them when their avg hit below 20 non stop Rahul was dropped in test after being best Indian batsman in Ind-Aus test series Rahul is dropped after being one of the best t20 batsman in side As if sehwag didnt fail, check sehwag odi record one of the most inconsistent batsman ever.....not only ganguly backed him but gave his batting spot If u see sehwag n yuvi numbers in equal number of games to pant n rahul.....u wont even find the talented again a false myth 1st of all its not 5 bowlers but 4 bowler + 1 all rounder which dhoni started in Eng tour with binny Long before dhoni n kohli, dravid did it in 2006 ind-pak series , playing irfan pathan under dravid - it was tough to drop any top batsman Under dhoni - he had low quality binny not pandya Kohli loosing match after match ??? oh u mean england n Sa Well how can u drop Pandya in ENg- he won u a game.....he was as inconsistent as others . He was dropped in last game and we still lost so the reason wasnt pandya In Sa- also he played an excellent knock in 1st test when every batsman was struggling to cross 50 apart from kohli from indian side he made 90+. So how can he be dropped Clearly u dnt understand the concept of backing- backing comes when a player isnt performing for long......everyone gets a decent rope when they face low due to past perfomances. Good captains persist more Laxman was not brought back by Ganguly, Laxman forced his way by scoring 1400 plus runs in Ranjis.You are failing to understand one fact when you do well in one format you get multiple chances in other formats.Sehwag was backed in odis becuase he was doing well in tests. how many tests did Dravid have five bowlers? Unlike Kohli who kept playing Pandya even though he was better off playing an extra batsman to support his weak batting lineup. You back a talented player not back any tom dick and harry for sake of backing players. How many tests Sairaj Bahutle and Nilesh Kulkarni play. both of them made their debuts under Ganguly .Did Ganguly went to sleep when these two players were playing or he forgot to back them. Ganguly had to back harbhajjan he won him the first test series that too against Aussies Bhajji played under Ganguly.Same thing with Yuvraj. Yuvraj scored 81 against Aussies in his first odi innings with bat. Clearly you have no understanding why certain players are backed and certain are not backed.It is called talent.When you have talent you get longer rope. Edited September 26, 2019 by putrevus
Gollum Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 (edited) Don't care anymore. BCCI COA Shastri Kohli MSK Ex-players Pundits, commies Media Indian fans IPL Bas khelo IPL, will keep the idiotic Indian fanbase interested....merge cricket with our film industries and let it become like WWE, already half way there. Still doubt these boring duds will be able to sell entertainment to the masses, mediocrity zindabad, corruption and nepotism zindabad,. A real pity cos we finally have an exciting test team, been in the making for the last 5 years. But the moment Shastri got his reappointment order, that was it...better to part ways. Clearly those who run Indian cricket don't give a *. Don't carry false hopes, don't get fooled, kuch nahi badlega Edited September 26, 2019 by Gollum
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 43 minutes ago, putrevus said: Laxman was not brought back by Ganguly, Laxman forced his way by scoring 1400 plus runs in Ranjis.You are failing to understand one fact when you do well in one format you get multiple chances in other formats.Sehwag was backed in odis becuase he was doing well in tests. a lot players score 1000+ runs.... laxman was bought back coz of his batting ability against aussie bowling which he showed in 1999 aus tour 43 minutes ago, putrevus said: how many tests did Dravid have five bowlers? Unlike Kohli who kept playing Pandya even though he was better off playing an extra batsman to support his weak batting lineup. Dravid had 5 batsman he cud not drop Kohli has pujara whose position was in doubt overseas, rahane in India....no 6th batsman till and when he got vihari he dropped pandya immediately so kohli didnt stick to his plan Also some other facts Dravid had the luxury of sehwag, ganguly, sachin to complete 5th bowler ....kohli didnt workload of bowlers were less then now. Another reason kohli can play with 4 bowlers in India coz spinner do bulk of work Anil kumble - he use to bowl 40 over mamoth spell which reduce our pace bowler work load overseas....check those scorecard. Ashwin n jadeja havent been in that league So wrong comparison , kohli move was necessity started under dhoni only 43 minutes ago, putrevus said: You back a talented player not back any tom dick and harry for sake of backing players. How many tests Sairaj Bahutle and Nilesh Kulkarni play. both of them made their debuts under Ganguly .Did Ganguly went to sleep when these two players were playing or he forgot to back them. Sairaj bahutule n nilesh werent talent enough to go ahead of kumble, bhajji or even karthik Funny u call them talent n denies rahul has talent 43 minutes ago, putrevus said: Ganguly had to back harbhajjan he won him the first test series that too against Aussies Bhajji played under Ganguly.Same thing with Yuvraj. Yuvraj scored 81 against Aussies in his first odi innings with bat. after that 81 yuvi was **** in some 30-40 games. fact check till 86 games yuvi avg 29 Till 30 game yuvi avg was 22 as i said yuvi wnt have lasted 30 games with those scores under kohli.......when i say ganguly backed these played till hilt he did rahul also scored 100 in Aus, ENG, WI.....2-100s in t20 which even kohli doesnt have. 43 minutes ago, putrevus said: Clearly you have no understanding why certain players are backed and certain are not backed.It is called talent.When you have talent you get longer rope. So one score of yuvi makes him talented n scores os rahul doesnt make him wah re.....ur defination of talent is not consistent
putrevus Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 17 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: a lot players score 1000+ runs.... laxman was bought back coz of his batting ability against aussie bowling which he showed in 1999 aus tour Dravid had 5 batsman he cud not drop Kohli has pujara whose position was in doubt overseas, rahane in India....no 6th batsman till and when he got vihari he dropped pandya immediately so kohli didnt stick to his plan Also some other facts Dravid had the luxury of sehwag, ganguly, sachin to complete 5th bowler ....kohli didnt workload of bowlers were less then now. Another reason kohli can play with 4 bowlers in India coz spinner do bulk of work Anil kumble - he use to bowl 40 over mamoth spell which reduce our pace bowler work load overseas....check those scorecard. Ashwin n jadeja havent been in that league So wrong comparison , kohli move was necessity started under dhoni only Sairaj bahutule n nilesh werent talent enough to go ahead of kumble, bhajji or even karthik Funny u call them talent n denies rahul has talent after that 81 yuvi was **** in some 30-40 games. fact check till 86 games yuvi avg 29 Till 30 game yuvi avg was 22 as i said yuvi wnt have lasted 30 games with those scores under kohli.......when i say ganguly backed these played till hilt he did rahul also scored 100 in Aus, ENG, WI.....2-100s in t20 which even kohli doesnt have. So one score of yuvi makes him talented n scores os rahul doesnt make him wah re.....ur defination of talent is not consistent Pandya was given enough tests to show if he was any good , but his returns were not better than guy like Vihari and it has been proved once more in WI especially for this team.Pandya is luxury, Vihari or 6th batsman is necessity. Kohli played 5 bowlers at expense of losing a test which no other Indian captain did, He could have played safe and opted for four bowlers but he wanted 20 wickets.That take guts and he stuck to it and gave Pandya every chance to succeed. What part of playing 15 continous tests in 4 different continents don't you understand ,that is called backing a talented player by any book.If Rahul flops it is not TM's fault.It is totally on Rahul.I don't care how many T20 100s he has, there are other players who when given a chance like Rahul got would have cemented their place in the team.Rahul was deemed talented thats why TM stuck to him for so long.
Vilander Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 5 hours ago, putrevus said: This captain is trying to make Indian team compete in all conditions and people are mouthing him off.Why are people expecting Indian team to all of sudden turn into 2000 Australian teams or 1980s WI team. You need talent also to win.We have an opener who rarely crosses single digit score in two years across four continents but somehow is more talented than the best batsman in the team and captain is jealous of his talent. not all. Kohli is phenomenal. coach and selectors can do better. and back players based on formats they excel in, and not drop them in wrong format. we see this with KLR in T20 and now Pant in Tests. Unless they feel they will roll out spinning tracks and Pant can keep up so they decided on Saha tactically.
Ankit_sharma03 Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 (edited) 44 minutes ago, putrevus said: Pandya was given enough tests to show if he was any good , but his returns were not better than guy like Vihari and it has been proved once more in WI especially for this team.Pandya is luxury, Vihari or 6th batsman is necessity. Wi attack cant be compared to SA n ENG in their own backyard. Roach holder is not in same category as Rabadda, anderson , broad He did decent in those chances.....he was as good n bad as others in those series . An all rounder is also a necessity Quote Kohli played 5 bowlers at expense of losing a test which no other Indian captain did, He could have played safe and opted for four bowlers but he wanted 20 wickets.That take guts and he stuck to it and gave Pandya every chance to succeed. 5th bowler was not played for wkts but to give main bolwers a rest....a job done perfectly fine by sehwag, ganguly, sachin in those days and pandya did win a test match overseas......not an easy achievement Quote What part of playing 15 continous tests in 4 different continents don't you understand ,that is called backing a talented player by any book. No one is denyied he was backed in that phhase (somethiing that m accepting) but no one can deny - he was dropped unfairely when he was in form in test and t20 now Which was of his t20 stats u didnt understand as compare to dhawan.... Quote If Rahul flops it is not TM's fault.It is totally on Rahul. Simple when u drop a player in form n tell him he is 2nd choice it affects his confidence and mindset......already he was sitted unfairely in other formats (something ur not accepting) If a player is held responsible for being dropped when he isnt making runs then TM is responsible for dropping him when he was making runs Quote I don't care how many T20 100s he has, there are other players who when given a chance like Rahul got would have cemented their place in the team.Rahul was deemed talented thats why TM stuck to him for so long. If a player like that t20 record dont matter to u then dont say that team has no talented players Coz u had a guy with 43 avg n 148 s/r yet u choose a guy with 27 avg n 129 s/r Every format matters....., U dnt judge form of one format on others as diff skills are required Edited September 26, 2019 by Ankit_sharma03
Nikhil_cric Posted September 29, 2019 Posted September 29, 2019 They can play IPL 24*7 for all i care. If Kohli wanted a team that can compete in all conditions, he should start backing exceptionally talented youngsters and/or those who were doing very well in A tours/Ranji . Select siraj for white ball cricket and discard him when he is clearly a red ball bowler. Bash pant without giving him a fair chance in Lois before the world cup and stick with a dhoni who is worse than boycotts grandma at this point. Select a 32 year old Rohit Sharma who is a proven ttf in tests like there are no other options. Indian cricket is rotten to the core. Considering the talent and resources at our disposal there was no excuse for the failure in the world cup as well and Shastri gets a contract . Wow!
rtmohanlal Posted September 29, 2019 Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) badly want this COA , especially that pig eating pig faced edulji leach out of the cricket related matters. If Pandya didn't miss those matches, who knows, his lengthy stay at the crease(due to bit more experience from those missed matches) would have even made India win that semi. then 2 morons prasad & sastri ...... need better replacements.... Kohli also should keep aside his ego and give away captaincy in limited overs to perform at his level best for the sake of the team. As for poll, interest is still there but at reduced expectations level. Edited September 29, 2019 by rtmohanlal Jimmy Cliff 1
Lannister Posted September 29, 2019 Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) It's easy to blame COA but the circus has been going on for 10 years now. Under Dhoni, the Test team was an embarrassment and under Kohli, it's the LOIs. There's just no accountability for these two. Edited September 29, 2019 by Lannister Stan AF 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now