Is racism against non-black poc downplayed?

[coffee_rules]

3 hours ago, Franco Vazquez said:

Now some nallas on this thread would say that it’s an isolated incident and that how Blacks can get away with anything Bc they were discriminated 300 years ago

Rodney King happened in 1992, Floyd in 2020

[Franco Vazquez]

1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Rodney King happened in 1992, Floyd in 2020

Do you want me to tell how many people black people have killed?

[coffee_rules]

On 3/29/2021 at 7:06 PM, Franco Vazquez said:

Do you want me to tell how many people black people have killed?

Both are true, black on black crime is much more than other way around, like white on black, but you cannot deny the kind of systemic racism happens. Just like casteism in rural India. You cannot deny everything is not hunky-dory for them. 

Edited April 1, 2021 by coffee_rules

[sandeep]

On 3/19/2021 at 2:33 AM, Under_Score said:

Sikh community In Canada had to deal with lot of racism from White Europeans in the past. It all started in the early 1900s and Racism was still prevailing until the 70s. I immensely respect our first generation Sikh immigrants who fought back racism Physically, that's the only way the racists of that time understood. Even in the 70s when my mom's brothers who were teens had immigrated to Canada...like many other Punjabis here, the families used to carry hockey sticks in their cars....fought battles on the streets whenever/wherever situations arose. This 'NO FEAR' attitude of the Sikhs made it easy for the other South Asian Immigrants who followed. I'm so proud of our community for fighting racism.

 

utter nonsense.  

[Vilander]

On 3/29/2021 at 8:06 PM, Franco Vazquez said:

Do you want me to tell how many people black people have killed?

hey man crime can not be racialized. this is similar to someone saying since xyz terrorist is a practicing Muslim, so i will call terrorism related deaths as deaths due to religion of the preparator. 

[coffee_rules]

11 hours ago, sandeep said:

 

utter nonsense.  

Then you don’t know about the kirpan saving the tilak from Moghuls narrative. 

[EnterTheVoid]

14 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Then you don’t know about the kirpan saving the tilak from Moghuls narrative. 

 

What's this narrative? I would like to know more. 

[Jimmy Cliff]

 

 

Deja vu.

 

[Khota]

On 3/29/2021 at 7:06 PM, Franco Vazquez said:

Do you want me to tell how many people black people have killed?

You are missing the point. The entire black race gets discriminated. The racism against blacks is institutional.

Blacks have suffered a lot and dont mitigate it by quoting few incidents here and there.

[sandeep]

33 minutes ago, Khota said:

You are missing the point. The entire black race gets discriminated. The racism against blacks is institutional.

Blacks have suffered a lot and dont mitigate it by quoting few incidents here and there.

you are talking to a child who doesn't know jack about America, its history, or its institutions.  He is sitting in the UAE living off his parents, while spending time trolling on forums for his 'patriotic' pakistani agenda.

[coffee_rules]

11 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

What's this narrative? I would like to know more. 

That Sikhs saved Hindus from Moghuls. This is oft-repeated historical narrative is used to get votes from Sikhs and also used in debates/opEds when victims are Sikhs. Today’s generations,  almost believes it. During the time of Aurangzeb. The 5 people who sacrifice The Guru called out and Khalsa which was formed , they were all from different parts of the country, one was even from Andhra or Orissa. Where were no Sikhs. It was under the Dharmic umbrella, Guru Govind was a Durga devotee and many Sikhs of his era proudly wore the tilak themselves. It was one community where one supported the other. Unlike now, the Khalsa and Khalustanis has created a monotheistic anti-Dharmic religion.l We can see them in kaneda spewing gaumutra abuses on Hindus. But it is only a few, but an alarming trend. 

 

[PunterLog]

9 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

That Sikhs saved Hindus from Moghuls. This is oft-repeated historical narrative is used to get votes from Sikhs and also used in debates/opEds when victims are Sikhs. Today’s generations,  almost believes it. During the time of Aurangzeb. The 5 people who sacrifice The Guru called out and Khalsa which was formed , they were all from different parts of the country, one was even from Andhra or Orissa. Where were no Sikhs. It was under the Dharmic umbrella, Guru Govind was a Durga devotee and many Sikhs of his era proudly wore the tilak themselves. It was one community where one supported the other. Unlike now, the Khalsa and Khalustanis has created a monotheistic anti-Dharmic religion.l We can see them in kaneda spewing gaumutra abuses on Hindus. But it is only a few, but an alarming trend.

 

The largest Sikh empire to exist is shown in the above pic. Here's the Maratha empire for comparision.

 

 

Sikhs fought against Muslims for a variety of reasons, the most important being defending their own territory.

 

I've seen too many people believing this myth of Sikhs saving Hindus. Yeah, they must have saved Hindus in a few battles while defending their own territory but so did many Hindu kingdoms.

[BacktoCricaddict]

Often I hear the question about racism in America: "There is equality under the law now.  So, why aren't black people making progress?  Why are they complaining?"  

 

This video explains:

 

 

[vvvslaxman]

I watched this documentary on Amazon prime. This world is similar to what world current alt right wanted take  America to. Good history info.