Jump to content

India vs SA, 1st T20I (N), Thiruvananthapuram


vvvslaxman

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, coffee_rules said:

Great partnership, Kela got all the abuse, but held one end and ensured the win, somebody from SA top order should have played anchor like him

His "strike-rate-is-overrated" approach works under some conditions.  Good job of taking advantage of that and providing some solidity.  But, in better conditions, he needs to attack in the PP from the get-go.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Keegan Petersen?

 

He's good in Tests not sure of T20

 

Brevis should have been a must. When he clicks he can psychologically demoralize opposition.

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Brevis should have been a must. When he clicks he can psychologically demoralize opposition.

 

With RVD also not there, he was a must. 

 

Instead they got Bavuma and Hendricks :wal

Posted
5 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

His "strike-rate-is-overrated" approach works under some conditions.  Good job of taking advantage of that and providing some solidity.  But, in better conditions, he needs to attack in the PP from the get-go.

Yeah, but today one of top3 had to bat through like that as the batting in PP was tough. Nobody could dominate the bowler in the PP. . SA Markram should have done that. I like such pitches where bowlers are key

Posted
2 hours ago, Need4Speed said:

now teh real problem starts for bowling..tat they cant finish lower order\tail easily..

as expected..they couldnt finish their tail..we wud be very much struggling if SKY didnt change the momentum..if they cant address the bowling woes..you wont reach taht far in T20 WC...today's victory need to be enjoyed..however we dont need to forget we will not get this level of swing in Australia..

I always prefer Ravi Bishnoi against lower order\tail..as our phaast bowlers arent good enough to finish them

 

Posted

 

6 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

His "strike-rate-is-overrated" approach works under some conditions.  Good job of taking advantage of that and providing some solidity.  But, in better conditions, he needs to attack in the PP from the get-go.

 

Hes showed much better intent in last few matches, though not much runs ro show. Today he played as per situation, we could have easily been 4 down in PP. 

My issue with him is choking under pressure, which he needs to fix this WC 

Posted
3 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Yeah, but today one of top3 had to bat through like that as the batting in PP was tough. Nobody could dominate the bowler in the PP. . SA Markram should have done that. I like such pitches where bowlers are key

 

It's not as if he was solid. Could have got out anytime. Lucky more than good innings

Posted
5 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

It's not as if he was solid. Could have got out anytime. Lucky more than good innings

Sky edged a six second ball , he could have been out there. One of Bavuma and Rabada also dropped him. Luck plays a bg part in T20s

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

Good to see Sky make more soft and pretty runs. 2 soft players there putting on an exhibition.

But one is a National treasure and one is a National curse as per ICF. 

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted
14 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

Good to see Sky make more soft and pretty runs. 2 soft players there putting on an exhibition.

 

One is not like the other.. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...