Jump to content

BCCI to remove Shreyas Iyer and Ishan Kishan from central contracts for refusing to play domestic cricket


Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Deepak Chahar is a major culprit in this regard.

Porcelain Chahar has certainly gotten away with a lot

Posted
1 hour ago, figo6762 said:

And no one talks about kohli. How can he waltz into the team ?  Not defending the other guys … but kohli needs to be called out

BCCI has diff rules for kohli and pandu, and diff ones for the rest.

Posted
17 hours ago, Lord said:

 

In that case Iyer shouldn't be selected in Tests too. So should be fine

Iyer was playing a test last week unlike Hardik who last played in 2018 who has sort-off announced test retirement. let's not argue for sake of argument and pretend there are no differences. 

Posted
16 hours ago, New guy said:

Then he shouldnt get a A category contract, should be at max B

I don't think definition of grade A contract is someone who plays all format.  Hardik if fit would be our white ball captain. Had he not got injured he would have lead India in t20 wc. 

Posted
1 hour ago, jf1gp_1 said:

Iyer was playing a test last week unlike Hardik who last played in 2018 who has sort-off announced test retirement. let's not argue for sake of argument and pretend there are no differences. 

 

Why does that matter? This action should bar him for Test selection. Anything other than that is discrimination

Posted
4 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Why does that matter? This action should bar him for Test selection. Anything other than that is discrimination

Yes let's bar a player from test selection who physically struggles to complete a t20 series, will never survive a test match and hasn't played on in last 6 years. 

Posted
35 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said:

Yes let's bar a player from test selection who physically struggles to complete a t20 series, will never survive a test match and hasn't played on in last 6 years. 

 

Everything will happen if you enforce discipline. Pandu has played Tests. Doesn't bother now because of IPL and his overhyped status in Indian cricket.

 

Otherwise no point sanctioning a player who also does similar thing i.e. prioritising IPL. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Everything will happen if you enforce discipline. Pandu has played Tests. Doesn't bother now because of IPL and his overhyped status in Indian cricket.

 

Otherwise no point sanctioning a player who also does similar thing i.e. prioritising IPL. 

I am all for it. While at it also bar Mandhana  from selection in mens test side. 

Posted (edited)

So pandya is still in A, Kohli in A+, while only Iyer and kishan were removed.

 

Bharat, Mukesh and Patidhar all get C while Jurel and Sarfraz need to play one more test to be eligible 

Edited by New guy
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, New guy said:

So pandya is still in A, Kohli in A+, while only Iyer and kishan were removed 

Why shouldn't Kohli be in A+ again.Pandya also belongs in A as he plays both whiteball formats.

Edited by putrevus

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...