Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, MediumPacer said:

Let's face it Indians arent that great at cricket.

 

More foreigners should be allowed in the 11 instead of being on the bench ,they are a lot more gifted and also capable players.

 

I would lift any restrictions,let them pick the best side.


have u been watchin ipl all these over paid foreigners failing big time except for srh (for once).

Posted
6 minutes ago, Chaos said:


have u been watchin ipl all these over paid foreigners failing big time except for srh (for once).

Many have performed,and anyone can fail ,indians are even bigger failures.

Posted

No, most of the premium overseas are already in the XI barring one of two.

 

We have already seen what little value these fringe overseas are providing-  Spencer, Mphaka, Nortje, Topley, Coetezee, Alzari Joseph, Sikandar Raza, Naveen ul Haq etc. 

 

The only good players that are missing in action are Santner, Philips and Maharaj.

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Many are wannabe Mamoon,but they fail spectacularly

Mamoon actually makes sensible points.  OP suffers from extreme cognitive dissonance. 

 

Says we need only medium pacers on Indian wickets but then wants foreigners when IPL teams pick a lot of foreigners primarily for genuine pace.

Posted
2 hours ago, Scarface said:

No thanks - would prefer to watch the local lads like Shashank/Mayank/etc who value & benefit from the IPL rather than overpaid tourists. Foreigners can play all they want in their own local leagues.

Who is stopping them from being picked ,but there are quite a few ordinary indian talents who should be removed. 

Posted
1 hour ago, deepdynamo said:

No, most of the premium overseas are already in the XI barring one of two.

 

We have already seen what little value these fringe overseas are providing-  Spencer, Mphaka, Nortje, Topley, Coetezee, Alzari Joseph, Sikandar Raza, Naveen ul Haq etc. 

 

The only good players that are missing in action are Santner, Philips and Maharaj.

 

These foreigners have better potential than indian players,how about likes of gurbaz who is missing out in place of venky iyer or jansen in place of unadkat or natarajan

Posted
1 hour ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Apart from Stubbs, Klaasen, Salt, Head and Pooran, no foreign players have done anything great with the bat.

 

But sure, let's keep adding foreign batsmen . 

how about fraser or narine or russel ,lot of the foreigners are pacers or allrounders.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Mamoon actually makes sensible points.  OP suffers from extreme cognitive dissonance. 

 

Says we need only medium pacers on Indian wickets but then wants foreigners when IPL teams pick a lot of foreigners primarily for genuine pace.

I said medium pace works better than quicker pace in ranji trophy .

 

In ipl it's new ball swing or cutters provided  pitch is bare ,if there is grass then cutters dont work that well, you need some quicker deliveries.

Posted
2 minutes ago, maniac said:

Some teams may have additional foreign talent sitting on their bench but overall the foreign pool quality of world cricket isn’t that great at the moment.

 

5 quota is actually good rather than current 4

Posted
12 minutes ago, maniac said:

Some teams may have additional foreign talent sitting on their bench but overall the foreign pool quality of world cricket isn’t that great at the moment.

 

those bench players should be used over some of these guys

×
×
  • Create New...