goose Posted March 6 Posted March 6 idenitical scores. an absolutely bonkers statistial fluke ! https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/reliance-world-cup-1987-88-60876/australia-vs-england-final-65117/full-scorecard https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/icc-men-s-t20-world-cup-2025-26-1502138/india-vs-england-2nd-semi-final-1512772/full-scorecard BacktoCricaddict, nevada, Mariyam and 2 others 2 3
zen Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Eng has not been lucky so far in subcon. it even lost that 2016 T20 F to WI when WI hit 4 6s in the last over to turn the game on its head.
maniac Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Only statistical anamaoly is the number of overs and run rate but great nevada 1
goose Posted March 6 Author Posted March 6 3 hours ago, maniac said: Only statistical anamaoly is the number of overs and run rate but great thats makes it more amazing not less ! two wildly different formats, nearly 40 years apart, same scores. it beautifully highlights how batting has evolved ! BacktoCricaddict and maniac 1 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Back in those days, teams would aim to have 100 in 25, 250 in 50. Thankfully those days are over. Ultimate_Game 1
vvvslaxman Posted March 6 Posted March 6 6 minutes ago, Lord said: Thala for a reason grade cricketer randomly uses the Thala name to boost viewership lol Even during semi final review they said Thala for a reason. Lord 1
vvvslaxman Posted March 6 Posted March 6 43 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Back in those days, teams would aim to have 100 in 25, 250 in 50. Thankfully those days are over. KL Rahul will take offense to this comment BacktoCricaddict 1
Lord Posted March 6 Posted March 6 1 hour ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Back in those days, teams would aim to have 100 in 25, 250 in 50. Thankfully those days are over. Miss those days BacktoCricaddict and Laaloo 1 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted March 6 Posted March 6 54 minutes ago, Lord said: Miss those days ... when watching cricket and napping were simultaneous activities :-) nevada 1
jf1gp_1 Posted March 7 Posted March 7 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: KL Rahul will take offense to this comment that's why we have a garbage ODI team Ultimate_Game 1
Lord Posted March 7 Posted March 7 1 hour ago, BacktoCricaddict said: ... when watching cricket and napping were simultaneous activities :-) Why you hate bowlers BacktoCricaddict 1
Ultimate_Game Posted March 7 Posted March 7 4 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Back in those days, teams would aim to have 100 in 25, 250 in 50. Thankfully those days are over. And you used to double score after 30 overs if you hadn't lost more than 3 wkts by that stage. Good old days
nevada Posted March 8 Posted March 8 On 3/7/2026 at 2:56 AM, BacktoCricaddict said: Back in those days, teams would aim to have 100 in 25, 250 in 50. Thankfully those days are over. And 20-25 for no loss in the first ten, defending solidly against the moving new ball. BacktoCricaddict 1
neel roy Posted March 8 Posted March 8 Think indias odi team in 90s prabhakar, azhar,kambli, manjrekar, sidhu, raju. Only saving graces were tendulkar, srinath, kumble..then 1999 taunton game actually changed everything BacktoCricaddict 1
BacktoCricaddict Posted March 8 Posted March 8 6 hours ago, nevada said: And 20-25 for no loss in the first ten, defending solidly against the moving new ball. No gap between bat and pad :-) nevada 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now