Jump to content

Ajit Agarkar Was 'Angry' At BCCI For Backing Rohit Sharma, Realised He Couldn't Drop Him


wanted_desi

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has this been ever case where Player approached the Admin after being told he will play his last match. Rohit is going to fail big time in SA. Feel bad for Jaiswal. 

 

 

Quote

 

According to a PTI report, Rohit was at the centre of the breakdown of the BCCI-Agarkar relationship. The report said that before the three-ODI series against England, Agarkar, with support of the Indian team management and even some BCCI officials, decided to move on from Rohit. South Zone selector Pragyan Ojha, who’s Rohit’s good friend, was tasked with communicating the decision to the veteran.

 

 

The reasoning behind it was that Agarkar didn’t want to rely on Rohit, who would be 40 next year, for the 2027 World Cup and wanted to give the natural successor, Yashasvi Jaiswal, a run of about 20 ODIs to make his place.

 

However, Rohit was not happy with the decision and how he was being ‘treated’ by the selectors. The report said he approached a ‘a very powerful administrator’, following which Saikia made his remark that dropped like a bombshell before the final ODI against England at Lord’s.

 

VVS Laxman and Agarkar also had big differences over handling injured players and India A scheduling. Laxman, known for prioritising strong teams, favoured fielding the best available players, while Agarkar questioned the need to send a first-choice side to the Asian Games.


 

 

https://www.news18.com/cricket/ajit-agarkar-was-angry-at-bcci-for-backing-rohit-sharma-realised-he-couldnt-drop-him-ws-l-10341244.html

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, wanted_desi said:

Has this been ever case where Player approached the Admin after being told he will play his last match. Rohit is going to fail big time in SA. Feel bad for Jaiswal. 

 

 

 

https://www.news18.com/cricket/ajit-agarkar-was-angry-at-bcci-for-backing-rohit-sharma-realised-he-couldnt-drop-him-ws-l-10341244.html

 

 

Rohit is a walking wicket in sa 

Posted (edited)

Good riddance for kicking this useless fellow as a selector, he ruined all team by filling them up with useless bits and pieces players like Sundar and jurel in all formats and ignoring much more deserving candidates.

 

If he was dancing to tunes of Gambhir then he was more useless than we have given him credit.

Edited by putrevus
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Good riddance for kicking this useless fellow as a selector, he ruined all team by filling them up with useless bits and pieces players like Sundar and jurel in all formats and ignoring much more deserving candidates.

 

If he was dancing to tunes of Gambhir then he was more useless than we have given him credit.

You want MSK Prasad back ?

Who will bring in Moorkhesh Kumar, Awaste Khan, Zaleel Ahmed & Andacut ?

 

We will become a laughing stock. Even Kanglus will start mocking at our looser trundlers. 

 

Agarkar did brought in Gurnoor, Mayank, Ashok, Harshit. Prasidh under his tenure has done well in Tests, Mayank won the MoS against Zimbabwe...Ashok & Harshit are clearly a level or two above the 4 horsemen whose name I mentioned above.

 

If Agarkar goes out, then I want a selector who has vision to select the fast bowlers, not the weak malnourished trundlers.

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

You want MSK Prasad back ?

Who will bring in Moorkhesh Kumar, Awaste Khan, Zaleel Ahmed & Andacut ?

 

We will become a laughing stock. Even Kanglus will start mocking at our looser trundlers. 

 

Agarkar did brought in Gurnoor, Mayank, Ashok, Harshit. Prasidh under his tenure has done well in Tests, Mayank won the MoS against Zimbabwe...Ashok & Harshit are clearly a level or two above the 4 horsemen whose name I mentioned above.

 

 

Selecting in some odd t20 series does not make him a good selector, how many core players has he developed or identified.

 

Once you select young players you need to back them,  why was Mayank not playing in England.Were guys like Ashok persisted??

 

Kamboj was sent to England as replacement and when he was more useless than the guy present in Prasidh , Prasidh played Oval test and lucked out on few wickets.Stop calling Prasidh as even decent bowler.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
Just now, Lone Wolf said:

Shameless stuff by BCCI proper Dehati behaviour...no guts no vision.

 

No wonder these jokers get outmaneuvered by that paindu Naqvi.  Shameless board

 

Agarkar the true patriot really for going all out against these leeches 

new selector will be a yes man 

our 2027 world cup hope already ruined 

Posted
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Selecting in some odd t20 series does not make him a good selector, how many core players has he developed or identified.

 

Once you select young players you need to back them,  why was Mayank not playing in England.Were guys like Ashok persisted??

 

Kamboj was sent to England as replacement and when he was more useless than the guy present in Prasidh , Prasidh played Oval test and lucked out on few wickets.Stop calling Prasidh as even decent bowler.

 

Agarkar gave chances to Gurnoor right ? Did the previous selection committee even bothered about him ? I am sure they weren't even aware of the fact that a tall 6.5 inch bowler who can bowl 140-150k even exists, didnt Dravid said we dont have tall fast bowlers ? Gurnoor is still in the squad so it shows they have trust over him.

 

They did it despite of the fact that Aaqib Nabi PR was literally abusing Gill, Agarkar & GG for the non selection of Nabi, as Gurnoor didnt play IPL.

 

Mayank's non selection was a cause of concern, but he is for the WI series, that shows he is in the scheme of things. Ashok is injured at the moment but still Agarkar went with Yash Thakur instead of Mukesh Koomar coz he wants pace. Only thing which Agarkar could have done more in selecting Tyagi as well..but its still an upgrade over the past jokers.

 

As I said, I am up for new selector if he can pay attention to fast bowlers. But Agarkar has done more right than previous selectors. 

 

Prasidh is decent, he thrives on the pitches where you have to hit the deck hard and generate bounce. He has done it in England, Australia and even in recently concluded SL series. Not the star of the show but definitely better than many pacers who are stat padding in domestics courtesy of slow and low bounce pitches.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Manucrick said:

new selector will be a yes man 

our 2027 world cup hope already ruined 

 

8 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Shameless stuff by BCCI proper Dehati behaviour...no guts no vision.

 

No wonder these jokers get outmaneuvered by that paindu Naqvi.  Shameless board

 

Agarkar the true patriot really for going all out against these leeches 

 

Its frustrating to see how myopic our selectors and ex commentators can be.

 

Power struggle & ego clashes in Indian Cricket is genuine and disagreements arent considered as constructive criticism to evaluate a player at depth.

 

No wonder why we keep on selecting likes of B Kumar & V Kumar in Australia where batters toy with them at their 120kph pace..making a mockrey of our pace bowling culture.

Posted (edited)

@putrevus

Forgot to tell, Agarkar is responsible for Abhishek Sharma's inclusion. The rocket engine of our T20 team, he is the one who brought back Varun C as well, plus even Tilak Varma got strong backing from Agarkar...he is limited but helped us won a crucial tournament final against the terrorist nation.

 

He is also responsible for revival of Ishan Kishan & Sanju Samson.

 

Edited by singhvivek141
Posted
Just now, wanted_desi said:

Don’t be surprised that B Kumar is opening your bowling attack in WC2027. Jadeja taking that all rounder spot and Rohit opening.

 

What a disgrace is this Fatso Sharma, rooting against him every single inning. 

I wouldn't be surprised by anything with the new selectors anything can happen Agarkar was the one who kept Bhuvi away from the Indian team dropped Rahul from the T20 setup and moved on from the underperforming Rohit and Kohli in Tests

Posted
13 hours ago, Suhaan said:

badada Vada should have been dragged by the collar and kicked out there and then, after he mislead from the front just after the massive win(start) at Perth during last BGT

Have to feel for Jaiswal.  His prime is getting wasted and it's effecting him in Tests

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Have to feel for Jaiswal.  His prime is getting wasted and it's effecting him in Tests

 

Not having him play the '23 WC was itself a blunder. Now he is going to sit out the '27 edition also. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...